Low-to-Moderate Correlations Between Repeated Sprint Ability and Aerobic Capacity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Strength and Conditioning Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000752
S. Ulupınar, S. Özbay, Cebrail Gençoğlu, T. Hazır
{"title":"Low-to-Moderate Correlations Between Repeated Sprint Ability and Aerobic Capacity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"S. Ulupınar, S. Özbay, Cebrail Gençoğlu, T. Hazır","doi":"10.1519/SSC.0000000000000752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. ABSTRACT This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide meta-analytic estimates of the relationships between repeated sprint ability (RSA) outputs (total sprint time [TST] and fatigue scores) and aerobic capacity indicators (V̇O2max, the covered distance in the endurance shuttle run test [SRTdistance], and the velocity at the anaerobic lactate threshold [ALTvelocity]). To identify potential studies for inclusion, a search strategy was implemented on MEDLINE (through PubMed) and Web of Science. The correlation coefficients between RSA outputs and aerobic capacity indicators were extracted from the individual studies to reveal a pooled correlation. After the identification of studies providing inclusion criteria, 45 studies consisting of 1,488 accumulated participants were included. Meta-analysis showed the positive moderate relationships between TST and V̇O2max (pooled r = 0.444, p < 0.001), TST and SRTdistance (pooled r = 0.465, p < 0.001), TST and ALTvelocity (pooled r = 0.527, p < 0.001), RSA fatigue score and V̇O2max (pooled r = 0.449, p < 0.001), and RSA fatigue score and ALTvelocity (pooled r = 0.460, p < 0.001), which showed a low positive relationship between RSA fatigue score and SRTdistance (pooled r = 0.305, p = 0.029). This study showed pooled correlations between RSA outputs and practical aerobic capacity indicators. However, contrary to popular belief that there were stronger relationships, these relationships were low to moderate.","PeriodicalId":21993,"journal":{"name":"Strength and Conditioning Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"462 - 474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strength and Conditioning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. ABSTRACT This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide meta-analytic estimates of the relationships between repeated sprint ability (RSA) outputs (total sprint time [TST] and fatigue scores) and aerobic capacity indicators (V̇O2max, the covered distance in the endurance shuttle run test [SRTdistance], and the velocity at the anaerobic lactate threshold [ALTvelocity]). To identify potential studies for inclusion, a search strategy was implemented on MEDLINE (through PubMed) and Web of Science. The correlation coefficients between RSA outputs and aerobic capacity indicators were extracted from the individual studies to reveal a pooled correlation. After the identification of studies providing inclusion criteria, 45 studies consisting of 1,488 accumulated participants were included. Meta-analysis showed the positive moderate relationships between TST and V̇O2max (pooled r = 0.444, p < 0.001), TST and SRTdistance (pooled r = 0.465, p < 0.001), TST and ALTvelocity (pooled r = 0.527, p < 0.001), RSA fatigue score and V̇O2max (pooled r = 0.449, p < 0.001), and RSA fatigue score and ALTvelocity (pooled r = 0.460, p < 0.001), which showed a low positive relationship between RSA fatigue score and SRTdistance (pooled r = 0.305, p = 0.029). This study showed pooled correlations between RSA outputs and practical aerobic capacity indicators. However, contrary to popular belief that there were stronger relationships, these relationships were low to moderate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复冲刺能力与有氧能力之间的低至中等相关性:一项系统综述和meta分析
补充数字内容可在文本中获得。摘要本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在对重复冲刺能力(RSA)输出(总冲刺时间[TST]和疲劳评分)与有氧能力指标(V * O2max、耐力穿梭跑测试中的覆盖距离[SRTdistance]和无氧乳酸阈值速度[ALTvelocity])之间的关系进行荟萃分析。为了确定可能纳入的研究,在MEDLINE(通过PubMed)和Web of Science上实施了搜索策略。RSA输出与有氧能力指标之间的相关系数从单个研究中提取,以揭示汇总相关性。在确定提供纳入标准的研究后,纳入了45项研究,共1488名受试者。荟萃分析显示,积极温和的结核菌素之间的关系和V̇O2max(汇集r = 0.444, p < 0.001), TST和SRTdistance(汇集r = 0.465, p < 0.001), TST和ALTvelocity(汇集r = 0.527, p < 0.001), RSA疲劳评分和V̇O2max(汇集r = 0.449, p < 0.001),和RSA疲劳评分和ALTvelocity(汇集r = 0.460, p < 0.001),显示低积极的RSA疲劳评分之间的关系和SRTdistance(汇集r = 0.305, p = 0.029)。本研究显示了RSA输出与实际有氧能力指标之间的综合相关性。然而,与人们普遍认为的更强的关系相反,这些关系是低到中等的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strength and Conditioning Journal
Strength and Conditioning Journal 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Strength and Conditioning Journal is the professional journal for strength coaches, personal trainers, physical therapists, athletic trainers, and other health professionals working in the strength and conditioning field. The journal’s mission is to publish articles that report both the practical applications of research findings and the knowledge gained by experienced professionals.
期刊最新文献
Types and Contributors to Occupational Fatigue The Use of Global Positioning Systems Devices to Measure Maximum Velocity in Field-Based Team Sport Athletes: A Narrative Review Effect of Using Different Intensities in Resistance Training for Muscle Hypertrophy Gains—A Narrative Review Preparing Basketball Players for Competition During COVID-19 Lockdown: An International Strength and Conditioning Perspective Selection of Key Performance Indicators for Your Sport and Program: Proposing a Complementary Process-Driven Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1