{"title":"The pricing of skewness: Evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange","authors":"J. P. Steyn, L. Theart","doi":"10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The historical skewness of stock return distributions could potentially affect future stock returns. Previous studies in developed markets have shown that investors prefer shares exhibiting positively skewed or ‘lottery-like’ payoff profiles. The higher demand for these shares results in a negative relationship between skewness and expected stock returns. This study investigates the extent to which asymmetrical returns are priced on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange over the period August 2002 to December 2019. Using portfolio-level analysis, this study analyses the returns of quintile portfolios sorted on past self-skewness. Risk-adjusted returns are evaluated against an equally weighted benchmark. In addition, the presence of a monotonic relationship between past self-skewness and future returns is tested with the monotonic relation test of Patton and Timmermann (2010), as well as the Wolak (1987, 1989) test. Unlike the developed market evidence, this study finds evidence of a positive relationship between past self-skewness and future returns on the JSE. This effect remains even after controlling for size and industry effects. The results suggest that positive skewness is rewarded on a risk-adjusted basis. Overall, the study provides insights for investors regarding the importance of considering the past asymmetry of stock return distributions in investment decision-making processes.","PeriodicalId":44496,"journal":{"name":"Investment Analysts Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"133 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ABSTRACT The historical skewness of stock return distributions could potentially affect future stock returns. Previous studies in developed markets have shown that investors prefer shares exhibiting positively skewed or ‘lottery-like’ payoff profiles. The higher demand for these shares results in a negative relationship between skewness and expected stock returns. This study investigates the extent to which asymmetrical returns are priced on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange over the period August 2002 to December 2019. Using portfolio-level analysis, this study analyses the returns of quintile portfolios sorted on past self-skewness. Risk-adjusted returns are evaluated against an equally weighted benchmark. In addition, the presence of a monotonic relationship between past self-skewness and future returns is tested with the monotonic relation test of Patton and Timmermann (2010), as well as the Wolak (1987, 1989) test. Unlike the developed market evidence, this study finds evidence of a positive relationship between past self-skewness and future returns on the JSE. This effect remains even after controlling for size and industry effects. The results suggest that positive skewness is rewarded on a risk-adjusted basis. Overall, the study provides insights for investors regarding the importance of considering the past asymmetry of stock return distributions in investment decision-making processes.
期刊介绍:
The Investment Analysts Journal is an international, peer-reviewed journal, publishing high-quality, original research three times a year. The journal publishes significant new research in finance and investments and seeks to establish a balance between theoretical and empirical studies. Papers written in any areas of finance, investment, accounting and economics will be considered for publication. All contributions are welcome but are subject to an objective selection procedure to ensure that published articles answer the criteria of scientific objectivity, importance and replicability. Readability and good writing style are important. No articles which have been published or are under review elsewhere will be considered. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is double blind and submission is via email. Accepted papers will then pass through originality checking software. The editors reserve the right to make the final decision with respect to publication.