Efficacy of corticosteroids as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lydia Mukanhaire, Huijie Li, Zhengyue Fan, Liping Yang, Y. Zheng, Zhuoling Ran, Xiaoyu Zong, Lingjian Zhang, Y. Gong, Changqing Yang, Jian Gong
{"title":"Efficacy of corticosteroids as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Lydia Mukanhaire, Huijie Li, Zhengyue Fan, Liping Yang, Y. Zheng, Zhuoling Ran, Xiaoyu Zong, Lingjian Zhang, Y. Gong, Changqing Yang, Jian Gong","doi":"10.15212/amm-2022-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of the complementary use of corticosteroids in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We searched all relevant documents in five scientific databases from inception to June 2022 to collect clinical trials (randomized controlled trials and controlled trials) reporting on the adjunctive use of corticosteroids in CAP treatment. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included the time to clinical stability, therapeutic efficacy, duration of antibiotic treatment and length of hospital/ICU stay. Therapeutic efficacy was defined as the rate of achieving clinical recovery with no fever, improvement or disappearance of cough. Clinical stability was defined by improvements in laboratory values. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and evaluated the quality of literature. Statistical analysis and meta-analysis of intervention measures and indicators were performed with IBM SPSS and RevMan 5.4 software. Nine randomized controlled trials comprising 2673 participants with CAP (1335 in the corticosteroid group and 1338 in the control group) were identified and included in this study. The mean cumulative corticosteroid dose and treatment duration were 298.00±287.140 mg and 5.22±1.787 days, respectively. Corticosteroid treatment was not associated with a significant decrease in mortality (RR; 95% CI, 0.96 [0.67–1.38], P=0.83). Because of the low number of included patients in our study, more studies with larger sample sizes and high-quality randomized, double-blind controlled trials are needed to confirm the results.","PeriodicalId":72055,"journal":{"name":"Acta materia medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta materia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15212/amm-2022-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of the complementary use of corticosteroids in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We searched all relevant documents in five scientific databases from inception to June 2022 to collect clinical trials (randomized controlled trials and controlled trials) reporting on the adjunctive use of corticosteroids in CAP treatment. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included the time to clinical stability, therapeutic efficacy, duration of antibiotic treatment and length of hospital/ICU stay. Therapeutic efficacy was defined as the rate of achieving clinical recovery with no fever, improvement or disappearance of cough. Clinical stability was defined by improvements in laboratory values. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and evaluated the quality of literature. Statistical analysis and meta-analysis of intervention measures and indicators were performed with IBM SPSS and RevMan 5.4 software. Nine randomized controlled trials comprising 2673 participants with CAP (1335 in the corticosteroid group and 1338 in the control group) were identified and included in this study. The mean cumulative corticosteroid dose and treatment duration were 298.00±287.140 mg and 5.22±1.787 days, respectively. Corticosteroid treatment was not associated with a significant decrease in mortality (RR; 95% CI, 0.96 [0.67–1.38], P=0.83). Because of the low number of included patients in our study, more studies with larger sample sizes and high-quality randomized, double-blind controlled trials are needed to confirm the results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮质类固醇作为辅助疗法治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
本研究的目的是系统评价补充使用皮质类固醇治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的临床疗效。我们从一开始到2022年6月在五个科学数据库中搜索了所有相关文件,以收集报告在CAP治疗中辅助使用皮质类固醇的临床试验(随机对照试验和对照试验)。主要结果是死亡率,次要结果包括达到临床稳定的时间、治疗效果、抗生素治疗的持续时间和住院/ICU的时间。疗效被定义为在没有发烧、咳嗽改善或消失的情况下实现临床康复的比率。临床稳定性的定义是实验室值的提高。两名研究人员根据纳入和排除标准对文献进行独立筛选,提取数据并评估文献质量。使用IBM SPSS和RevMan 5.4软件对干预措施和指标进行统计分析和荟萃分析。本研究确定并纳入了9项随机对照试验,包括2673名CAP参与者(皮质类固醇组1335人,对照组1338人)。皮质类固醇的平均累积剂量和治疗时间分别为298.00±287.140 mg和5.22±1.787天。皮质类固醇治疗与死亡率的显著降低无关(RR;95%CI,0.96[0.67-1.38],P=0.83)。由于我们研究中纳入的患者数量较少,需要更多样本量更大的研究和高质量的随机、双盲对照试验来证实结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New generation estrogen receptor-targeted agents in breast cancer: present situation and future prospectives. Application of PROTACs in Target Identification and Target Validation. PROTACs Targeting Epigenetic Proteins. Exploitation of platelets for antitumor drug delivery and modulation of the tumor immune microenvironment Emerging role of HJURP as a therapeutic target in cancers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1