The United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan: analysis of perceptions in India and Pakistan

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Global Change Peace & Security Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI:10.1080/14781158.2021.1910227
Z. Ahmed, S. Bhatnagar, Ahmad AlQadri
{"title":"The United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan: analysis of perceptions in India and Pakistan","authors":"Z. Ahmed, S. Bhatnagar, Ahmad AlQadri","doi":"10.1080/14781158.2021.1910227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Kashmir, the worst fallout from the current state of India and Pakistan’s confrontations at the Line of Control (LoC) is the total disregard for the 2003 ceasefire agreement. While political parties, governments and armed forces on both sides of the conflict are key actors in the current dynamics, also stationed on the LoC are military observers as part of the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP), first instituted in 1949. While India is opposed to the presence of the UN military observers, little is known about the perceptions of the group’s role and its potential capacity to play a constructive role in keeping peace along the border. This research project is an endeavour to gain this understanding based on the views of selected elites and opinion makers in India and Pakistan. The data points to challenges to UNMOGIP’s mandate following the Simla Agreement of 1972 and the change in the status of the ceasefire line to the LoC. Compounded further by the severity of the conflict between India and Pakistan, New Delhi’s opposition to UNMOGIP’s mandate further weakened its operational capacity to effectively monitor and report ceasefire violations.","PeriodicalId":44867,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Peace & Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14781158.2021.1910227","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Peace & Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2021.1910227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In Kashmir, the worst fallout from the current state of India and Pakistan’s confrontations at the Line of Control (LoC) is the total disregard for the 2003 ceasefire agreement. While political parties, governments and armed forces on both sides of the conflict are key actors in the current dynamics, also stationed on the LoC are military observers as part of the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP), first instituted in 1949. While India is opposed to the presence of the UN military observers, little is known about the perceptions of the group’s role and its potential capacity to play a constructive role in keeping peace along the border. This research project is an endeavour to gain this understanding based on the views of selected elites and opinion makers in India and Pakistan. The data points to challenges to UNMOGIP’s mandate following the Simla Agreement of 1972 and the change in the status of the ceasefire line to the LoC. Compounded further by the severity of the conflict between India and Pakistan, New Delhi’s opposition to UNMOGIP’s mandate further weakened its operational capacity to effectively monitor and report ceasefire violations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合国驻印度和巴基斯坦军事观察小组:对印度和巴基斯坦看法的分析
在克什米尔,印巴在控制线(LoC)对峙的现状所带来的最严重后果是双方完全无视2003年的停火协议。虽然冲突双方的政党、政府和武装部队是当前局势的关键行动者,但作为1949年首次设立的联合国驻印度和巴基斯坦军事观察组(印巴观察组)一部分的军事观察员也驻扎在实际控制线。虽然印度反对联合国军事观察员的存在,但人们对该组织的作用及其在维持边境和平方面发挥建设性作用的潜在能力的看法知之甚少。本研究项目旨在根据印度和巴基斯坦选定的精英和舆论制造者的观点,努力获得这种理解。这些数据表明,1972年《西姆拉协定》签订后,印巴观察组的任务受到挑战,停火线对实际控制线的地位发生了变化。再加上印度和巴基斯坦之间冲突的严重程度,新德里对印巴观察组任务的反对进一步削弱了其有效监测和报告违反停火行为的行动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Peace & Security
Global Change Peace & Security POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Mujeres y discursos de paz en la historiaBy María Elena DíezJorge, Cándida MartínezLópez (Eds.). Berlin: Peter Lang, 2023. ISBN 978‐3‐631‐88221‐4 An Army Afire: How the US Army Confronted its Racial Crisis in the Vietnam Era By BethBailey. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2023 Unofficial Peace Diplomacy: Private Peace Entrepreneurs in Conflict Resolution ProcessesBy LiorLehrs. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2022 Six Stops on the National Security Tour: Rethinking warfare economiesMiriamPemberton, New York: Routledge. 2022 Virtual prayers and real violence: Religion as a resource in challenging times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1