An Evaluation Framework of a Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Equity Research

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY American Journal of Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.1177/1098214021991923
Roni M. Ellington, Clara B. Barajas, A. Drahota, C. Meghea, Heatherlun S. Uphold, Jamil B. Scott, E. Lewis, C. Furr-Holden
{"title":"An Evaluation Framework of a Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Equity Research","authors":"Roni M. Ellington, Clara B. Barajas, A. Drahota, C. Meghea, Heatherlun S. Uphold, Jamil B. Scott, E. Lewis, C. Furr-Holden","doi":"10.1177/1098214021991923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in the number of large federally funded transdisciplinary programs and initiatives. Scholars have identified a need to develop frameworks, methodologies, and tools to evaluate the effectiveness of these large collaborative initiatives, providing precise ways to understand and assess the operations, community and academic partner collaboration, scientific and community research dissemination, and cost-effectiveness. Unfortunately, there has been limited research on methodologies and frameworks that can be used to evaluate large initiatives. This study presents a framework for evaluating the Flint Center for Health Equity Solutions (FCHES), a National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)-funded Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center (TCC) for health disparities research. This report presents a summary of the FCHES evaluation framework and evaluation questions as well as findings from the Year-2 evaluation of the Center and lessons learned.","PeriodicalId":51449,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Evaluation","volume":"43 1","pages":"357 - 377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214021991923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in the number of large federally funded transdisciplinary programs and initiatives. Scholars have identified a need to develop frameworks, methodologies, and tools to evaluate the effectiveness of these large collaborative initiatives, providing precise ways to understand and assess the operations, community and academic partner collaboration, scientific and community research dissemination, and cost-effectiveness. Unfortunately, there has been limited research on methodologies and frameworks that can be used to evaluate large initiatives. This study presents a framework for evaluating the Flint Center for Health Equity Solutions (FCHES), a National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)-funded Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center (TCC) for health disparities research. This report presents a summary of the FCHES evaluation framework and evaluation questions as well as findings from the Year-2 evaluation of the Center and lessons learned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生公平研究跨学科合作中心的评估框架
在过去的几十年里,由联邦政府资助的大型跨学科项目和倡议的数量有所增加。学者们已经确定,需要制定框架、方法和工具来评估这些大型合作举措的有效性,提供准确的方法来理解和评估运营、社区和学术伙伴合作、科学和社区研究传播以及成本效益。不幸的是,对可用于评估大型举措的方法和框架的研究有限。这项研究提供了一个评估弗林特健康公平解决方案中心(FCHES)的框架,该中心是由国家少数民族健康和健康差异研究所(NIMHD)资助的跨学科合作中心(TCC),用于健康差异研究。本报告概述了FCHES评估框架和评估问题,以及中心第二年评估的结果和经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Evaluation (AJE) publishes original papers about the methods, theory, practice, and findings of evaluation. The general goal of AJE is to present the best work in and about evaluation, in order to improve the knowledge base and practice of its readers. Because the field of evaluation is diverse, with different intellectual traditions, approaches to practice, and domains of application, the papers published in AJE will reflect this diversity. Nevertheless, preference is given to papers that are likely to be of interest to a wide range of evaluators and that are written to be accessible to most readers.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the Intersections Between Collaboration and Use in Evaluation Practice The Role of Evaluation Theory and Practice in Narrowing the Research-to-Practice Gap Rich Pictures: A Visual Method for Sensemaking Amid Complexity Book Review: Cost-Inclusive Evaluation: Planning It, Doing It, Using It by Nadini Persaud & Brian T. Yates From the Co-Editors: Being in Relationship with Citizens, Communities, and Clients in Evaluation Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1