RESULTS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL INSPECTION OF THE AUTHOR'S PEDAGOGICAL SYSTEM OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF FUTURE ECONOMISTS

O. P. Kirdan
{"title":"RESULTS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL INSPECTION OF THE AUTHOR'S PEDAGOGICAL SYSTEM OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF FUTURE ECONOMISTS","authors":"O. P. Kirdan","doi":"10.34671/sch.hbr.2020.0401.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The article presents the results of experimental verification of the author’s pedagogical system of training of future economists and the effectiveness of organizational and pedagogical conditions for its provision. Methods used: empirical: conversation, observation, questioning, questioning, testing, self-evaluation, peer review method, pedagogical experiment (ascertaining and formative stages); statistical: methods of mathematical statistics for the analysis of experimental data, determining the reliability of the obtained. The testing of the structural-functional model of partnership interaction between higher education applicants, higher education institutions and stakeholder enterprises under separate organizational and pedagogical conditions included the implementation of motivational, organizational, content, activity and evaluation and performance blocks. The results obtained at the ascertaining stage confirmed the assumption that the future economists would exceed the sufficient and average levels of quality training for undergraduates. It is stated that in the control and experimental groups there are practically no applicants for higher education, in which the criteria are formed at a low level. Analysis, using Pearson’s χ2 test, revealed no statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups, which confirmed their homogeneity in composition. At the formative stage of the pedagogical experiment, the working hypotheses, conceptual provisions, pedagogical system of quality assurance of future economists’ training were experimentally tested by enhancing the partnership cooperation in the educational process of higher education applicants, higher education institution and employer-stakeholder; organizational and pedagogical conditions for successful functioning of the structural and functional model of the pedagogical system were tested. The analysis of the effectiveness of the model implementation and the set of organizational and pedagogical conditions was made by comparing the results at the ascertain- ing and formative stages according to the four distinguished criteria for assessing the quality of training of future economists. The formed expert group recorded the positive dynamics of the distribution of undergraduates by the quality levels of their vocational training in all experimental groups during the pedagogical experiment. Statistical analysis, using Pearson’s χ2 test, revealed significant differences between the control and experimental groups at the formative stage. It is concluded that the model of partnership interaction in the educational process of higher education applicants, higher education institutions and stakeholder enterprises has been put into practice and proved to be effective and expedient to be used in combination with all the distinct organizational and pedagogical conditions.","PeriodicalId":34335,"journal":{"name":"Khumanitarni Balkanski izsledvaniia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khumanitarni Balkanski izsledvaniia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34671/sch.hbr.2020.0401.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The article presents the results of experimental verification of the author’s pedagogical system of training of future economists and the effectiveness of organizational and pedagogical conditions for its provision. Methods used: empirical: conversation, observation, questioning, questioning, testing, self-evaluation, peer review method, pedagogical experiment (ascertaining and formative stages); statistical: methods of mathematical statistics for the analysis of experimental data, determining the reliability of the obtained. The testing of the structural-functional model of partnership interaction between higher education applicants, higher education institutions and stakeholder enterprises under separate organizational and pedagogical conditions included the implementation of motivational, organizational, content, activity and evaluation and performance blocks. The results obtained at the ascertaining stage confirmed the assumption that the future economists would exceed the sufficient and average levels of quality training for undergraduates. It is stated that in the control and experimental groups there are practically no applicants for higher education, in which the criteria are formed at a low level. Analysis, using Pearson’s χ2 test, revealed no statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups, which confirmed their homogeneity in composition. At the formative stage of the pedagogical experiment, the working hypotheses, conceptual provisions, pedagogical system of quality assurance of future economists’ training were experimentally tested by enhancing the partnership cooperation in the educational process of higher education applicants, higher education institution and employer-stakeholder; organizational and pedagogical conditions for successful functioning of the structural and functional model of the pedagogical system were tested. The analysis of the effectiveness of the model implementation and the set of organizational and pedagogical conditions was made by comparing the results at the ascertain- ing and formative stages according to the four distinguished criteria for assessing the quality of training of future economists. The formed expert group recorded the positive dynamics of the distribution of undergraduates by the quality levels of their vocational training in all experimental groups during the pedagogical experiment. Statistical analysis, using Pearson’s χ2 test, revealed significant differences between the control and experimental groups at the formative stage. It is concluded that the model of partnership interaction in the educational process of higher education applicants, higher education institutions and stakeholder enterprises has been put into practice and proved to be effective and expedient to be used in combination with all the distinct organizational and pedagogical conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对笔者构建的未来经济学家专业培养教学体系的实验检验结果
本文介绍了对作者培养未来经济学家的教学体系的实验验证结果,以及提供该体系的组织和教学条件的有效性。使用的方法:实证:对话、观察、提问、提问、测试、自我评价、同行评审方法、教学实验(确定和形成阶段);统计学:采用数理统计的方法对实验数据进行分析,确定所获得数据的可靠性。在不同的组织和教学条件下,对高等教育申请人、高等教育机构和利益相关者企业之间伙伴关系互动的结构-功能模型的测试包括动机、组织、内容、活动以及评估和绩效块的实施。在确定阶段获得的结果证实了未来经济学家将超过本科生足够和平均的质量培训水平的假设。据指出,在对照组和实验组中,实际上没有申请高等教育的人,这些人的标准是低水平的。使用Pearsonχ2检验进行的分析显示,实验组和对照组之间没有统计学上的显著差异,这证实了它们在成分上的同质性。在教学实验的形成阶段,通过加强高等教育申请人、高等教育机构和雇主利益相关者在教育过程中的伙伴合作,对未来经济学家培训的工作假设、概念规定、质量保证教学体系进行了实验检验;测试了教学系统结构和功能模式成功运作的组织和教学条件。根据评估未来经济学家培训质量的四个不同标准,通过比较确定和形成阶段的结果,对模型实施的有效性以及一套组织和教学条件进行了分析。组成的专家组记录了在教学实验期间,所有实验组的本科生职业培训质量水平分布的积极动态。使用Pearsonχ2检验的统计分析显示,对照组和实验组在形成阶段存在显著差异。研究表明,高等教育申请人、高等教育机构和利益相关者企业在教育过程中的伙伴关系互动模式已经付诸实践,并被证明是有效和方便的,可以结合所有不同的组织和教学条件来使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN THE CONDITIONS OF KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY AND INDUSTRY 4.0 - POTENTIAL AND PERSPECTIVES MEDICAL ASPECTS OF SUPPORTING CHILDREN WITH AUTIC SPECTRUM DISORDERS NAKHCHIVAN CITY IS BEGINNING OF BEGINNING ABOUT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELIGION AND ART ERP SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AS AN IMPORTANT STAGE OF THE COMPANY'S DEVELOPMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1