High-intensity laser therapy (class IV) and ibuprofen gel phonophoresis for treating knee osteoarthritis among people living in hilly terrain: a randomized, double blind, multi-centre trial protocol

Q4 Health Professions Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2022.e4674
A. Srivastav, V. Saini, Deeksha Sharma, Asir John Samuel
{"title":"High-intensity laser therapy (class IV) and ibuprofen gel phonophoresis for treating knee osteoarthritis among people living in hilly terrain: a randomized, double blind, multi-centre trial protocol","authors":"A. Srivastav, V. Saini, Deeksha Sharma, Asir John Samuel","doi":"10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2022.e4674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: People living in hilly terrain with abnormal cyclic loading could lead to bone cartilage degeneration. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and Ibuprofen gel phonophoresis (IGP) have innumerable benefits for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, it is still unclear which treatment is effective among them in rehabilitating patients with KOA. OBJECTIVE: To verify whether 8-week HILT is no worse than the IGP in treating patients with knee osteoarthritis living in hilly terrain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 108 individuals with KOA will be recruited by simple random sampling to participate in a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Recruited individuals with KOA will be randomly divided into two groups, the HILT group (experimental group) and the IGP group (active control group). The treatment duration of HILT and IGP will be 8 minutes in one session/knee joint for each day for 3 days/week up to 8 weeks in addition to their conventional exercises for 30 minutes. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Digitalized pain pressure algometer, and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire are the outcome measures that will be recorded at baseline, end of the 8-week post-intervention period. PERSPECTIVES: The results from this trial will contribute to evidence-based recommendations for the clinical implication of whether HILT is no worse than IGP, along with exercise intervention for treating individuals with KOA living in hilly terrain.\nTrial Registry: Clinical Trials Registry (NCT04320914)","PeriodicalId":36370,"journal":{"name":"Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2022.e4674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: People living in hilly terrain with abnormal cyclic loading could lead to bone cartilage degeneration. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and Ibuprofen gel phonophoresis (IGP) have innumerable benefits for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, it is still unclear which treatment is effective among them in rehabilitating patients with KOA. OBJECTIVE: To verify whether 8-week HILT is no worse than the IGP in treating patients with knee osteoarthritis living in hilly terrain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 108 individuals with KOA will be recruited by simple random sampling to participate in a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Recruited individuals with KOA will be randomly divided into two groups, the HILT group (experimental group) and the IGP group (active control group). The treatment duration of HILT and IGP will be 8 minutes in one session/knee joint for each day for 3 days/week up to 8 weeks in addition to their conventional exercises for 30 minutes. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Digitalized pain pressure algometer, and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire are the outcome measures that will be recorded at baseline, end of the 8-week post-intervention period. PERSPECTIVES: The results from this trial will contribute to evidence-based recommendations for the clinical implication of whether HILT is no worse than IGP, along with exercise intervention for treating individuals with KOA living in hilly terrain. Trial Registry: Clinical Trials Registry (NCT04320914)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高强度激光治疗(IV类)和布洛芬凝胶电泳治疗丘陵地区人群膝骨关节炎:一项随机、双盲、多中心的试验方案
摘要:生活在丘陵地带的人,其异常的循环载荷可能导致骨软骨退行性变。高强度激光治疗(HILT)和布洛芬凝胶语音反射(IGP)对膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者有无数的好处。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种治疗方法对KOA患者的康复有效。目的:验证8周HILT治疗丘陵地区膝骨关节炎患者是否不差于IGP。材料与方法:采用简单随机抽样的方法,共招募108例KOA患者参加随机、双盲、对照研究。招募的KOA患者将随机分为两组,HILT组(实验组)和IGP组(积极对照组)。HILT和IGP的治疗时间为每次8分钟/膝关节,持续3天/周,直到8周。此外,他们的常规练习为30分钟。西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数、数字化疼痛压力测量仪和36项简短健康调查问卷是在干预后8周结束时记录的基线结果。观点:该试验的结果将有助于对HILT是否不比IGP差的临床意义提供循证建议,以及对生活在丘陵地区的KOA患者进行运动干预的治疗。试验注册:临床试验注册中心(NCT04320914)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field and retrowalking in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a pilot study Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of Class IV Laser therapy and therapeutic ultrasound in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial Efficiency of pulsed electromagnetic field and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on painful shoulder following stroke Efficacy of pulmonary telerehabilitation on exercise tolerance, fatigue, perceived exertion, depression, and quality of life in COVID-19 survivors Improving walking via real-time visual feedback after stroke in treadmill training (RE-VISIT): a protocol for randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1