Dead or Alive? Odishan and Appalachian Mountains as Partners in Activism

Q2 Arts and Humanities The Sociological Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1177/00380229221081986
A. Pandey, Ann E. Kingsolver
{"title":"Dead or Alive? Odishan and Appalachian Mountains as Partners in Activism","authors":"A. Pandey, Ann E. Kingsolver","doi":"10.1177/00380229221081986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mountains may be simultaneously viewed through multiple logics—sacred or secular, dead property to be commodified or living and powerful community members, for example—unless and until one of those logics is used to destroy them. We compare the way these logics figure in environmental justice movements in Odisha, India and the Appalachian region of the United States. In the first example, mountains—considered sacred and alive—have served as partners in a successful movement by Dongaria Kondh women in Odisha to stop the destruction of the Niyamgiri hills through aluminium mining. In the second example, while there are competing logics that include views of mountains as sacred in the United States, a capitalist logic through which mountains are considered dead and without a role in acting on their own future has prevailed in extensive coal mining through the destructive method of mountaintop removal.","PeriodicalId":39369,"journal":{"name":"The Sociological Bulletin","volume":"71 1","pages":"232 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Sociological Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380229221081986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mountains may be simultaneously viewed through multiple logics—sacred or secular, dead property to be commodified or living and powerful community members, for example—unless and until one of those logics is used to destroy them. We compare the way these logics figure in environmental justice movements in Odisha, India and the Appalachian region of the United States. In the first example, mountains—considered sacred and alive—have served as partners in a successful movement by Dongaria Kondh women in Odisha to stop the destruction of the Niyamgiri hills through aluminium mining. In the second example, while there are competing logics that include views of mountains as sacred in the United States, a capitalist logic through which mountains are considered dead and without a role in acting on their own future has prevailed in extensive coal mining through the destructive method of mountaintop removal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死还是活?奥里萨邦和阿巴拉契亚山脉是行动主义的伙伴
山脉可以同时通过多种逻辑来看待——例如,神圣的或世俗的,被商品化的死亡财产或活着的强大的社区成员——除非其中一种逻辑被用来摧毁它们。我们比较了这些逻辑在印度奥里萨邦和美国阿巴拉契亚地区的环境正义运动中的作用。在第一个例子中,山——被认为是神圣的和有生命的——在奥里萨邦的Dongaria Kondh妇女成功地阻止了铝开采对Niyamgiri山的破坏。在第二个例子中,尽管存在着相互竞争的逻辑,包括在美国将山脉视为神圣的观点,但一种资本主义逻辑认为,山脉被认为是死的,对它们自己的未来没有任何作用,这种逻辑通过拆除山顶的破坏性方法在广泛的煤炭开采中占了上风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Sociological Bulletin
The Sociological Bulletin Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Analysing the New Educational Policy in the Context of Higher Education: Where is Gender? Gender, Religion and Higher Education: Strategies of Muslim Women Students in India Eroding Inclusions and Expanding Exclusions: Education During Pandemics Fostering Gender Just and Emancipatory Campuses in HEIs: Interrogating the Role of Gender Cells and ICs Towards Conceptualisation of Safe, Inclusive and Accessible Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1