Use of botanical gardens as arks for conserving pollinators and plant-pollinator interactions: A case study from the United States Northern Great Plains

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Pollination Ecology Pub Date : 2022-07-06 DOI:10.26786/1920-7603(2022)645
Isabela B. Vilella-Arnizaut, Diane V. Roeder, C. Fenster
{"title":"Use of botanical gardens as arks for conserving pollinators and plant-pollinator interactions: A case study from the United States Northern Great Plains","authors":"Isabela B. Vilella-Arnizaut, Diane V. Roeder, C. Fenster","doi":"10.26786/1920-7603(2022)645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Botanical gardens have contributed to plant conservation through the maintenance of both living and preserved plant specimens for decades. However, there is still a large gap in the literature about the potential conservation value that botanical gardens could provide to local pollinators. We investigated how plant-pollinator interaction network structure and diversity may differ between botanical gardens and native habitats by sampling and comparing two environments: a restored native grassland patch within a local botanical garden and fifteen native, remnant temperate grassland sites in the Northern Great Plains. We found pollinator diversity within the restored botanical garden’s native grassland patch to be at the high end of the distribution of the remnant temperate grassland sites throughout the entire flowering season. However, plant diversity and network community metrics between the two environments remained similar throughout, except that remnant temperate grasslands have more links (higher connectance) with pollinators than the garden patch. Overall, our findings demonstrate the promising role restored native grassland patches in botanical gardens could play as reservoirs for local pollinator communities by supporting plant-pollinator interactions comparable to those found in native habitat remnants in the same region.","PeriodicalId":30194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2022)645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Botanical gardens have contributed to plant conservation through the maintenance of both living and preserved plant specimens for decades. However, there is still a large gap in the literature about the potential conservation value that botanical gardens could provide to local pollinators. We investigated how plant-pollinator interaction network structure and diversity may differ between botanical gardens and native habitats by sampling and comparing two environments: a restored native grassland patch within a local botanical garden and fifteen native, remnant temperate grassland sites in the Northern Great Plains. We found pollinator diversity within the restored botanical garden’s native grassland patch to be at the high end of the distribution of the remnant temperate grassland sites throughout the entire flowering season. However, plant diversity and network community metrics between the two environments remained similar throughout, except that remnant temperate grasslands have more links (higher connectance) with pollinators than the garden patch. Overall, our findings demonstrate the promising role restored native grassland patches in botanical gardens could play as reservoirs for local pollinator communities by supporting plant-pollinator interactions comparable to those found in native habitat remnants in the same region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用植物园作为保护传粉媒介和植物与传粉媒介相互作用的公园:以美国北部大平原为例
几十年来,植物园通过维护现存和保存的植物标本,为植物保护做出了贡献。然而,关于植物园对当地传粉媒介的潜在保护价值,文献中仍然存在很大的差距。我们通过取样和比较两种环境:当地植物园内恢复的原生草地斑块和北部大平原15个原生温带残余草地遗址,研究了植物-传粉者相互作用网络结构和多样性在植物园和原生栖息地之间的差异。我们发现,在整个花期,恢复植物园原生草地斑块内的传粉者多样性处于温带残余草地分布的高端。然而,两种环境之间的植物多样性和网络群落指标始终保持相似,除了残余温带草地与传粉者的联系比花园斑块更多(更高的连通性)。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在植物园中恢复的原生草地斑块可以通过支持植物-传粉者相互作用来发挥当地传粉者群落的水库作用,类似于在同一地区的原生栖息地残留物中发现的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Journal of Pollination Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pollinator effectiveness and pollination dependency of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) in Swedish hemi-boreal forests Fecal sampling protocol to assess bumble bee health in conservation research Species-specific differences in bumblebee worker body size between different elevations: Implications for pollinator community structure under climate change Professor Sue Nicolson 1950-2023: Sweet solutions: pollinators and their physiology Flower-visiting lizards as key ecological actors for an endemic and critically endangered plant in the Canary Islands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1