Rethinking the historical film form: trauma, temporality and indirect representation in historical essay films

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Rethinking History Pub Date : 2023-05-07 DOI:10.1080/13642529.2023.2210377
Esin Paça Cengiz
{"title":"Rethinking the historical film form: trauma, temporality and indirect representation in historical essay films","authors":"Esin Paça Cengiz","doi":"10.1080/13642529.2023.2210377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In film scholarship, historical film has been identified as a form that portrays events and experiences that took place in the past. By building on Caruth’s concept of indirect representation, however, this article identifies a new historical film form that is not necessarily set in the past, but engages with questions regarding history, memory and historical representation. It conceptualizes this new form of ‘historical essay film’, and by analysing Voice of My Father, argues that rather than manifesting a desire to represent traumatic events directly, historical essay films refrain from the presumption that the medium of film can represent the reality of past events. To this end, they engage with past traumas indirectly through narratives that are set in the present day. The study further contends that the main thrust of historical essay films is to probe the discursive fields in which certain moments of the past are fixed, narrated and become predominant while others remain overlooked and unaccounted for. The article concludes with the claim that, as a consequence of their unconventional formal structures, historical essay films diminish the temporal distance between the past, present and future while also opening up new possibilities for rethinking what historical representation means.","PeriodicalId":46004,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking History","volume":"27 1","pages":"377 - 401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2023.2210377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In film scholarship, historical film has been identified as a form that portrays events and experiences that took place in the past. By building on Caruth’s concept of indirect representation, however, this article identifies a new historical film form that is not necessarily set in the past, but engages with questions regarding history, memory and historical representation. It conceptualizes this new form of ‘historical essay film’, and by analysing Voice of My Father, argues that rather than manifesting a desire to represent traumatic events directly, historical essay films refrain from the presumption that the medium of film can represent the reality of past events. To this end, they engage with past traumas indirectly through narratives that are set in the present day. The study further contends that the main thrust of historical essay films is to probe the discursive fields in which certain moments of the past are fixed, narrated and become predominant while others remain overlooked and unaccounted for. The article concludes with the claim that, as a consequence of their unconventional formal structures, historical essay films diminish the temporal distance between the past, present and future while also opening up new possibilities for rethinking what historical representation means.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史电影形式的再思考:历史随笔电影的创伤、时间性与间接再现
在电影研究中,历史电影被认为是一种描述过去发生的事件和经历的形式。然而,通过建立卡鲁斯的间接再现概念,本文确定了一种新的历史电影形式,它不一定以过去为背景,而是涉及历史、记忆和历史再现的问题。它将这种新形式的“历史散文电影”概念化,并通过分析《我父亲的声音》,认为历史散文电影没有表现出直接表现创伤事件的愿望,而是避免了电影媒介可以代表过去事件的现实的假设。为了达到这个目的,他们通过设定在今天的叙述间接地接触到过去的创伤。该研究进一步认为,历史散文电影的主旨是探索话语领域,在这些领域中,过去的某些时刻被固定、叙述并占据主导地位,而其他时刻则被忽视和未被解释。文章最后声称,由于其非常规的形式结构,历史散文电影缩小了过去、现在和未来之间的时间距离,同时也为重新思考历史表现的意义开辟了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rethinking History
Rethinking History Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: This acclaimed journal allows historians in a broad range of specialities to experiment with new ways of presenting and interpreting history. Rethinking History challenges the accepted ways of doing history and rethinks the traditional paradigms, providing a unique forum in which practitioners and theorists can debate and expand the boundaries of the discipline.
期刊最新文献
Creating Cromwell: an analysis of the historical novel’s position and potentiality through a study of Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall trilogy Between agency and event the book of Job as a Greek tragedy Being alongside: the practice of collaborative public history Just a matter of time: reviewing temporality in Australian historiography Transients, punks and hobos: rethinking the history of train hopping through experimental film
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1