Two-Temperature Modeling of Nonequilibrium Relaxation and Dissociation in Shock-Heated Oxygen

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2023-05-21 DOI:10.2514/1.t6753
Timothy T. Aiken, I. Boyd
{"title":"Two-Temperature Modeling of Nonequilibrium Relaxation and Dissociation in Shock-Heated Oxygen","authors":"Timothy T. Aiken, I. Boyd","doi":"10.2514/1.t6753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two-temperature models for coupled vibrational relaxation and dissociation in shock-heated oxygen are assessed using low-uncertainty measured data from reflected shock tube experiments. A computationally efficient multistep technique is developed to model the unsteady dynamics of shock reflection in a relaxing and dissociating gas. The developed technique is then benchmarked through comparison with unsteady computational fluid dynamic simulations. Results from the benchmarking effort demonstrate that the adopted multistep modeling procedure accurately captures the dominant gas dynamic effects influencing the state of the test gas at the measurement location. A parametric study is then performed to assess several combinations of possible two-temperature modeling approaches for nonequilibrium oxygen dissociation. The current assessment demonstrates that the widely adopted Park model is inconsistent with the measured data, while the recently developed modified Marrone and Treanor (MMT) model demonstrates promising agreement with the data. The results of the present study clearly indicate that the MMT model is more appropriate for two-temperature modeling of nonequilibrium oxygen dissociation than the legacy Park model. Patterns in the parametric comparison also suggest that the approximate treatment of non-Boltzmann vibrational state distributions within the MMT model may require improvement.","PeriodicalId":17482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.t6753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two-temperature models for coupled vibrational relaxation and dissociation in shock-heated oxygen are assessed using low-uncertainty measured data from reflected shock tube experiments. A computationally efficient multistep technique is developed to model the unsteady dynamics of shock reflection in a relaxing and dissociating gas. The developed technique is then benchmarked through comparison with unsteady computational fluid dynamic simulations. Results from the benchmarking effort demonstrate that the adopted multistep modeling procedure accurately captures the dominant gas dynamic effects influencing the state of the test gas at the measurement location. A parametric study is then performed to assess several combinations of possible two-temperature modeling approaches for nonequilibrium oxygen dissociation. The current assessment demonstrates that the widely adopted Park model is inconsistent with the measured data, while the recently developed modified Marrone and Treanor (MMT) model demonstrates promising agreement with the data. The results of the present study clearly indicate that the MMT model is more appropriate for two-temperature modeling of nonequilibrium oxygen dissociation than the legacy Park model. Patterns in the parametric comparison also suggest that the approximate treatment of non-Boltzmann vibrational state distributions within the MMT model may require improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冲击加热氧气中非平衡弛豫和离解的双温度模型
利用反射激波管实验的低不确定度测量数据,评估了激波加热氧气中耦合振动弛豫和离解的两个温度模型。开发了一种计算高效的多步技术来模拟弛豫和离解气体中冲击反射的非定常动力学。然后,通过与非定常计算流体动力学模拟的比较,对所开发的技术进行了基准测试。基准测试的结果表明,采用的多步骤建模程序准确地捕捉到了影响测量位置测试气体状态的主要气体动力学效应。然后进行参数研究,以评估非平衡氧离解可能的两种温度建模方法的几种组合。目前的评估表明,广泛采用的Park模型与测量数据不一致,而最近开发的改良Marrone和Treanor(MMT)模型与数据一致。本研究的结果清楚地表明,MMT模型比传统的Park模型更适合于非平衡氧离解的双温度建模。参数比较中的模式还表明,MMT模型中非玻尔兹曼振动状态分布的近似处理可能需要改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer
Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
19.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This Journal is devoted to the advancement of the science and technology of thermophysics and heat transfer through the dissemination of original research papers disclosing new technical knowledge and exploratory developments and applications based on new knowledge. The Journal publishes qualified papers that deal with the properties and mechanisms involved in thermal energy transfer and storage in gases, liquids, and solids or combinations thereof. These studies include aerothermodynamics; conductive, convective, radiative, and multiphase modes of heat transfer; micro- and nano-scale heat transfer; nonintrusive diagnostics; numerical and experimental techniques; plasma excitation and flow interactions; thermal systems; and thermophysical properties. Papers that review recent research developments in any of the prior topics are also solicited.
期刊最新文献
Performance Estimation of a Capillary-Fed Evaporative Microthruster Transient Response Analysis in Spacecraft Thermal Protection Structures Under Periodic Thermal Disturbances Characteristic Vibrational and Rotational Relaxation Times for Air Species from First-Principles Calculations Magnetohydrodynamics Flow of Hybrid Nanofluid Rotating in Annulus Through Two Coaxial Cylinders Direct Validation of Approximate Models for Molecular Vibrational Transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1