Low-dose versus Standard-Dose Leucovorin in the Treatment of Colon Cancer: Mansoura University Clinical Experience in Facing the Problem of Leucovorin Shortage

H. Elkalla, M. Zahi, Osama Eldamshety
{"title":"Low-dose versus Standard-Dose Leucovorin in the Treatment of Colon Cancer: Mansoura University Clinical Experience in Facing the Problem of Leucovorin Shortage","authors":"H. Elkalla, M. Zahi, Osama Eldamshety","doi":"10.21608/RESONCOL.2018.6256.1069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Drug shortages have become a health care problem worldwide. One of the important drugs that are affected by shortage is leucovorin. It is used with 5-fluorouracil in many protocols for gastro-intestinal tumors and its shortage would have a negative impact on the treatment outcome. Aim: To compare the effect of low-dose leucovorin versus the standard-dose in the treatment of stage II and III colon cancer. Methods: The study included 100 patients with stage II or III adenocarcinoma of the colon who presented to the Clinical Oncology Department at Mansoura University Hospital from January 2011 till December 2012 after curative resection and were scheduled to receive adjuvant FOLFOX6 regimen. Patients were randomly allocated to receive standard-dose leucovorin (200 mg/m2, group 1) or low-dose leucovorin (125 mg/m2, group 2), both administered on days 1 and 2 over 2 hours infusion before 5-fluoruracil. The end points were toxicity, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The two study groups were matched regarding age, sex, and tumor stage. The mean DFS was 48.36 months for group 1 and 49.12 for group 2 with no significant difference (p=0.866). The mean OS was 65.07 months for group 1 and 62.45 for group 2 with no significant difference (p=0.544). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding hematosuppression, diarrhea, mucositis, neurotoxicity and the need for hospitalization. Conclusion: Both protocols were well tolerated by all patients with no significant difference in the treatment outcome. The use of low-dose leucovorin protocol can help in solving the leucovorin shortage problem.","PeriodicalId":33915,"journal":{"name":"Research in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/RESONCOL.2018.6256.1069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Drug shortages have become a health care problem worldwide. One of the important drugs that are affected by shortage is leucovorin. It is used with 5-fluorouracil in many protocols for gastro-intestinal tumors and its shortage would have a negative impact on the treatment outcome. Aim: To compare the effect of low-dose leucovorin versus the standard-dose in the treatment of stage II and III colon cancer. Methods: The study included 100 patients with stage II or III adenocarcinoma of the colon who presented to the Clinical Oncology Department at Mansoura University Hospital from January 2011 till December 2012 after curative resection and were scheduled to receive adjuvant FOLFOX6 regimen. Patients were randomly allocated to receive standard-dose leucovorin (200 mg/m2, group 1) or low-dose leucovorin (125 mg/m2, group 2), both administered on days 1 and 2 over 2 hours infusion before 5-fluoruracil. The end points were toxicity, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The two study groups were matched regarding age, sex, and tumor stage. The mean DFS was 48.36 months for group 1 and 49.12 for group 2 with no significant difference (p=0.866). The mean OS was 65.07 months for group 1 and 62.45 for group 2 with no significant difference (p=0.544). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding hematosuppression, diarrhea, mucositis, neurotoxicity and the need for hospitalization. Conclusion: Both protocols were well tolerated by all patients with no significant difference in the treatment outcome. The use of low-dose leucovorin protocol can help in solving the leucovorin shortage problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低剂量与标准剂量Leucovorin治疗结肠癌癌症:Mansoura大学应对Leucovirin短缺问题的临床经验
背景:药物短缺已成为一个全球性的卫生保健问题。受短缺影响的重要药物之一是亚叶酸素。它与5-氟尿嘧啶在许多胃肠道肿瘤治疗方案中一起使用,缺乏它会对治疗结果产生负面影响。目的:比较低剂量亚叶酸素与标准剂量治疗II期和III期结肠癌的疗效。方法:研究纳入2011年1月至2012年12月在曼苏拉大学医院临床肿瘤科就诊的结肠II期或III期腺癌患者100例,这些患者在治愈性切除后,计划接受FOLFOX6辅助治疗方案。患者随机分配接受标准剂量亚叶酸钙(200 mg/m2,组1)或低剂量亚叶酸钙(125 mg/m2,组2),均在5-氟尿嘧啶前第1天和第2天输注2小时。终点为毒性、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:两个研究组在年龄、性别和肿瘤分期方面是匹配的。1组患者的平均生存期为48.36个月,2组患者的平均生存期为49.12个月,差异无统计学意义(p=0.866)。组1平均OS为65.07个月,组2平均OS为62.45个月,差异无统计学意义(p=0.544)。同样,两组在血液抑制、腹泻、粘膜炎、神经毒性和住院需求方面也没有显著差异。结论:两种治疗方案均具有良好的耐受性,治疗效果无显著差异。低剂量亚叶酸素方案的使用有助于解决亚叶酸素短缺问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Trastuzumab Administration Patterns on the Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer in a Resource-Limited Setting Chordoid Meningioma with Extensive Lymphocytic Infiltration Forming Lymphoid Follicles: A Case Report Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer in South Africa The Influence of Serum Leptin Level and Body Mass Index on the Prognosis of Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Multicentric vs. Unresectable Unicentric Castleman Disease with Active Presentation: An Orphan Rare Disease in a Young Egyptian Female Patient. A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1