Current and innovative therapeutic strategies for the treatment of giant cell arteritis

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458
A. Sebastian, A. Tomelleri, B. Dasgupta
{"title":"Current and innovative therapeutic strategies for the treatment of giant cell arteritis","authors":"A. Sebastian, A. Tomelleri, B. Dasgupta","doi":"10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Glucocorticoids represent a highly effective treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA); however, steroid-dependency frequently hinders an adequate dose reduction. This has led to a flourishing interest in new therapeutic strategies. Areas covered: An analysis of the treatments for GCA was conducted and structured in four sections: summary data supporting the use of glucocorticoids; uncertainty regarding the use of antithrombotic agents are discussed; studies on different conventional steroid-sparing agents are reported; controlled trials with already available biologic agents and the design of those still ongoing are presented. The basis for this review is a literature search on PubMed of studies published until 31st December 2020 on GCA treatment. Expert opinion: New GCA patients should be stratified, and therapeutic management should be tailored accordingly. High-risk patients should be treated early with steroid-sparing agents. However, current evidence only supports the use of tocilizumab, with conflicting data on methotrexate. Results of controlled trials evaluating other agents, like mavrilimumab, will be released soon; hopefully, this will lead to their inclusion as alternatives to tocilizumab. Even if biologic drugs seem highly effective, their use could be limited by high costs; hence, clinical research should not forget about less expensive conventional agents, such as leflunomide.","PeriodicalId":12118,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","volume":"9 1","pages":"161 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Glucocorticoids represent a highly effective treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA); however, steroid-dependency frequently hinders an adequate dose reduction. This has led to a flourishing interest in new therapeutic strategies. Areas covered: An analysis of the treatments for GCA was conducted and structured in four sections: summary data supporting the use of glucocorticoids; uncertainty regarding the use of antithrombotic agents are discussed; studies on different conventional steroid-sparing agents are reported; controlled trials with already available biologic agents and the design of those still ongoing are presented. The basis for this review is a literature search on PubMed of studies published until 31st December 2020 on GCA treatment. Expert opinion: New GCA patients should be stratified, and therapeutic management should be tailored accordingly. High-risk patients should be treated early with steroid-sparing agents. However, current evidence only supports the use of tocilizumab, with conflicting data on methotrexate. Results of controlled trials evaluating other agents, like mavrilimumab, will be released soon; hopefully, this will lead to their inclusion as alternatives to tocilizumab. Even if biologic drugs seem highly effective, their use could be limited by high costs; hence, clinical research should not forget about less expensive conventional agents, such as leflunomide.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗巨细胞动脉炎的现有和创新治疗策略
摘要简介:糖皮质激素是治疗巨细胞动脉炎的高效药物;然而,类固醇依赖性经常阻碍足够的剂量减少。这使得人们对新的治疗策略产生了浓厚的兴趣。涵盖的领域:对GCA的治疗方法进行了分析,分为四个部分:支持糖皮质激素使用的汇总数据;讨论了抗血栓药物使用的不确定性;报道了对不同常规类固醇保留剂的研究;介绍了现有生物制剂的对照试验以及仍在进行的生物制剂的设计。本综述的基础是在PubMed上检索截至2020年12月31日发表的GCA治疗研究的文献。专家意见:新的GCA患者应该分层,并相应地调整治疗管理。高危患者应尽早使用类固醇保留剂进行治疗。然而,目前的证据只支持使用托西利珠单抗,与甲氨蝶呤的数据相矛盾。评估马夫里穆单抗等其他药物的对照试验结果将很快公布;希望这将导致它们被纳入托西利珠单抗的替代品。即使生物药物看起来非常有效,它们的使用也可能受到高成本的限制;因此,临床研究不应忘记较便宜的常规药物,如来氟米特。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers all aspects of R&D on rare diseases and orphan drugs.
期刊最新文献
Emerging therapies against Naegleria fowleri Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of leishmaniasis The Orphan Drug Act and rare cancers: a retrospective analysis of oncologic orphan drug designations and associated approvals from 1983-2022 Orphan drugs approved in Canada: health technology assessment, price negotiation, and government formulary listing Overview of genetic testing in Prader-willi syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1