An Assessment of Research Data Services Through Client Interaction Records

J. Petters, A. Ogier, Amr B. Hilal
{"title":"An Assessment of Research Data Services Through Client Interaction Records","authors":"J. Petters, A. Ogier, Amr B. Hilal","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.14439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research data services have increasingly become a feature of academic libraries. In this paper, we provide an internal assessment of consulting reach and effectiveness for our Data Services provided by the University Libraries at Virginia Tech using client records from 2016 to 2020. Through this assessment we explore how service growth and reach across Virginia Tech has evolved with time. We also look more closely at these aspects for one college and discuss how we will use this data to assess the impact of our services. Finally, through the lens of client outcomes, we examine the trends of client interactions over the term of the study.  Initially, we envisioned a successful service as one useful to the largest number of entities (primarily colleges and institutes) across Virginia Tech. However, analysis of the data gathered over the past four years leads us to consider targeting our service growth where it might be most useful. Rather than prioritizing services that are useful to the largest number of researchers, instead we could (and perhaps should) prioritize engagement with researchers and research communities for whom our assistance can make the largest positive impact. This assessment of our client data demonstrates the utility of detailed client management records for periodic formative and summative assessment of research data services.","PeriodicalId":91322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.14439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research data services have increasingly become a feature of academic libraries. In this paper, we provide an internal assessment of consulting reach and effectiveness for our Data Services provided by the University Libraries at Virginia Tech using client records from 2016 to 2020. Through this assessment we explore how service growth and reach across Virginia Tech has evolved with time. We also look more closely at these aspects for one college and discuss how we will use this data to assess the impact of our services. Finally, through the lens of client outcomes, we examine the trends of client interactions over the term of the study.  Initially, we envisioned a successful service as one useful to the largest number of entities (primarily colleges and institutes) across Virginia Tech. However, analysis of the data gathered over the past four years leads us to consider targeting our service growth where it might be most useful. Rather than prioritizing services that are useful to the largest number of researchers, instead we could (and perhaps should) prioritize engagement with researchers and research communities for whom our assistance can make the largest positive impact. This assessment of our client data demonstrates the utility of detailed client management records for periodic formative and summative assessment of research data services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过客户交互记录评估研究数据服务
研究数据服务日益成为高校图书馆的一大特色。在本文中,我们使用2016年至2020年的客户记录,对弗吉尼亚理工大学图书馆提供的数据服务的咨询范围和有效性进行了内部评估。通过这项评估,我们探索了弗吉尼亚理工大学的服务增长和覆盖范围是如何随着时间的推移而演变的。我们还更仔细地研究了一所大学的这些方面,并讨论了我们将如何使用这些数据来评估我们服务的影响。最后,通过客户结果的视角,我们考察了研究期间客户互动的趋势。最初,我们设想一项成功的服务对弗吉尼亚理工大学最大数量的实体(主要是学院和研究所)有用。然而,对过去四年收集的数据的分析使我们考虑将我们的服务增长目标定在最有用的地方。我们可以(也许应该)优先考虑与研究人员和研究社区的接触,而不是优先考虑对最多研究人员有用的服务,我们的援助可以对他们产生最大的积极影响。对我们客户数据的评估证明了详细的客户管理记录对研究数据服务的定期形成性和总结性评估的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Book review: Open access in theory and practice: The theory-practice relationship and openness. Open Access with Chinese Characteristics: Understanding Recent History and Current Practice via Qualitative Interviews at a Large Chinese Research University Research Productivity among Scholarly Communication Librarians Increasing Access to Graduate Student Publishing Support: A Case Study of Reformatting the Publishing Academy Free and Open Source Automated Open Access Preprint Harvesting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1