{"title":"Die behördliche Aussetzung von Verwaltungsakten bei veränderter Sachlage. Rechtsnatur und Zulässigkeit am Beispiel der Ausfuhrgenehmigung","authors":"H. Sauer","doi":"10.3790/VERW.50.4.463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the international political and military crisis in Ukraine in 2014, a German armaments manufacturer intended to export a training camp for field exercise to the Russian Ministry of Defence. Exports of weapons and military engineering require permission (Ausfuhrgenehmigung) from the Bundesamt fur Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle, a government agency under the control of the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. As this permission had been granted before Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine, the considerable change of circumstances led to a re-assessment of the security situation and raised the question of how to deal with the permission. Section 49(2) of the Federal Administrative Procedures Act allows for a cancellation (Widerruf) of an administrative act (Verwaltungsakt) due to a change of circumstances, such as where the permission would have been denied had the circumstances changed before the permission was granted. However, such a cancellation irrevocably voids the administrative act. In some cases, it may be more appropriate to only suspend the permission in order to monitor the situation before making a final decision. In the case at hand, the Bundesamt therefore ordered the temporary suspension (Aussetzung) of the permission arguing that section 49(2) of the Administrative Procedures Act allowed not only for a cancellation but, a maiore ad minus, also for a suspension of administrative acts. \n \nThis assumption raises two questions: First, what is the distinct legal character of a suspension of an administrative act compared to its ultimate cancellation? Second, what are the specific legal requirements for such a suspension? With regard to the first question, the article concludes that the suspension relates to the enforceability (Vollziehbarkeit) of administrative acts, and that only validity (Wirksamkeit) and enforceability should be used to categorize the legal effects of administrative acts; other current differentiations such as interior and exterior validity or validity and legal existence are dismissed. Concerning the second question, the article analyses several legal provisions in different areas of administrative law, which allow for the suspension of administrative acts but shows that no such explicit legal basis exists in the field of foreign trade. This calls for an in-depth analysis of whether a suspension order can be based on a legal provision authorizing the cancellation of an administrative act. The article concludes that less intrusive measures (Minusmasnahmen) can replace measures provided for in a legal provision only under specific circumstances. It is argued that the requisite conditions are in principle fulfilled when a short-term suspension order referring to the temporary character of a change of circumstances is based on section 49(2) of the Administrative Procedures Act. \n \n \n \n \nRead More: https://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/doi/abs/10.3790/verw.50.4.463","PeriodicalId":36848,"journal":{"name":"Verwaltung","volume":"50 1","pages":"463-482"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verwaltung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/VERW.50.4.463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During the international political and military crisis in Ukraine in 2014, a German armaments manufacturer intended to export a training camp for field exercise to the Russian Ministry of Defence. Exports of weapons and military engineering require permission (Ausfuhrgenehmigung) from the Bundesamt fur Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle, a government agency under the control of the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. As this permission had been granted before Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine, the considerable change of circumstances led to a re-assessment of the security situation and raised the question of how to deal with the permission. Section 49(2) of the Federal Administrative Procedures Act allows for a cancellation (Widerruf) of an administrative act (Verwaltungsakt) due to a change of circumstances, such as where the permission would have been denied had the circumstances changed before the permission was granted. However, such a cancellation irrevocably voids the administrative act. In some cases, it may be more appropriate to only suspend the permission in order to monitor the situation before making a final decision. In the case at hand, the Bundesamt therefore ordered the temporary suspension (Aussetzung) of the permission arguing that section 49(2) of the Administrative Procedures Act allowed not only for a cancellation but, a maiore ad minus, also for a suspension of administrative acts.
This assumption raises two questions: First, what is the distinct legal character of a suspension of an administrative act compared to its ultimate cancellation? Second, what are the specific legal requirements for such a suspension? With regard to the first question, the article concludes that the suspension relates to the enforceability (Vollziehbarkeit) of administrative acts, and that only validity (Wirksamkeit) and enforceability should be used to categorize the legal effects of administrative acts; other current differentiations such as interior and exterior validity or validity and legal existence are dismissed. Concerning the second question, the article analyses several legal provisions in different areas of administrative law, which allow for the suspension of administrative acts but shows that no such explicit legal basis exists in the field of foreign trade. This calls for an in-depth analysis of whether a suspension order can be based on a legal provision authorizing the cancellation of an administrative act. The article concludes that less intrusive measures (Minusmasnahmen) can replace measures provided for in a legal provision only under specific circumstances. It is argued that the requisite conditions are in principle fulfilled when a short-term suspension order referring to the temporary character of a change of circumstances is based on section 49(2) of the Administrative Procedures Act.
Read More: https://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/doi/abs/10.3790/verw.50.4.463
在2014年乌克兰发生国际政治和军事危机期间,一家德国军备制造商打算向俄罗斯国防部出口一个训练营进行实地演习。武器和军事工程的出口需要联邦经济事务和能源部控制下的政府机构Bundesamt fur Wirtschaft und Ausfurkontroll的许可(Ausfurgenehmigung)。由于这一许可是在俄罗斯军事干预乌克兰之前获得的,情况的重大变化导致了对安全局势的重新评估,并提出了如何处理许可的问题。《联邦行政程序法》第49(2)条允许因情况变化而取消(Widerruf)行政法案(Verwaltungsakt),例如在授予许可之前,如果情况发生变化,许可将被拒绝。但是,这种撤销不可撤销地使行政行为无效。在某些情况下,在做出最终决定之前,为了监控情况,只暂停许可可能更合适。在本案中,联邦议院因此下令暂时暂停(Aussetzung)许可,辩称《行政程序法》第49(2)条不仅允许取消,而且允许暂停行政行为。这一假设提出了两个问题:首先,与最终取消行政行为相比,暂停行政行为的独特法律性质是什么?第二,这种暂停的具体法律要求是什么?关于第一个问题,该条的结论是,中止涉及行政行为的可执行性(Vollziehbarkeit),只有有效性(Wirksamkeit)和可执行性才能用于对行政行为的法律效力进行分类;目前的其他区别,如内部和外部有效性或有效性和法律存在性,都被驳回。关于第二个问题,文章分析了行政法不同领域的几项法律规定,这些规定允许暂停行政行为,但表明在外贸领域不存在这样明确的法律依据。这就需要深入分析暂停令是否可以以授权取消行政行为的法律条款为基础。文章的结论是,只有在特定情况下,侵入性较小的措施(Minusmasnahmen)才能取代法律条款中规定的措施。有人争辩说,如果根据《行政程序法》第49(2)条作出提及情况变化的临时性质的短期暂停令,则原则上满足了必要条件。阅读更多:https://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/doi/abs/10.3790/verw.50.4.463