Snowpark users’ multi-faceted relationship with risk

IF 2.8 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM European Journal for Sport and Society Pub Date : 2022-02-15 DOI:10.1080/16138171.2022.2032919
V. Reynier, B. Soulé, J. Pabion-Mouriès
{"title":"Snowpark users’ multi-faceted relationship with risk","authors":"V. Reynier, B. Soulé, J. Pabion-Mouriès","doi":"10.1080/16138171.2022.2032919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A majority of snow sports enthusiasts now use snowparks, even if only occasionally. Epidemiological studies highlight the high probability of accidents occurring at these facilities, compared to traditional pistes. We sought to understand why and how snowparks users tackle such dangers. The representations and behaviours adopted by riders were identified using a questionnaire-based survey, developed after an initial phase of qualitative research. Age and level of expertise are the two main criteria around which the specificities of snowparks users’ relationship with risk are organised. With a few rare exceptions, every expert freestyler has sustained an injury of some severity. At the same time, expert freestylers engage in a process of ‘denial’ regarding the dangers involved in their sport. However, expert freestylers are not simply reckless. Indeed, their relationship with risk appears to be highly calculated, judging from the various behaviours they adopt to minimise the risk of an accident occurring. Helmet wearing is the only risk management behaviour that is adopted less frequently as the individual level of ability increases. Such an attitude allows experts to test their own capacity for judgement and independent thought, while also demonstrating it to others. Thus, the relationship experts have with risk is shaped to a degree by their desire to feel part of a community and stand out from the crowd. The benefits expected from flirting with danger are the greatest and the most diverse among younger individuals. For these individuals, taking risks is a quest to find themselves and their limits and thus forge an identity.","PeriodicalId":45735,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Sport and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal for Sport and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2022.2032919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A majority of snow sports enthusiasts now use snowparks, even if only occasionally. Epidemiological studies highlight the high probability of accidents occurring at these facilities, compared to traditional pistes. We sought to understand why and how snowparks users tackle such dangers. The representations and behaviours adopted by riders were identified using a questionnaire-based survey, developed after an initial phase of qualitative research. Age and level of expertise are the two main criteria around which the specificities of snowparks users’ relationship with risk are organised. With a few rare exceptions, every expert freestyler has sustained an injury of some severity. At the same time, expert freestylers engage in a process of ‘denial’ regarding the dangers involved in their sport. However, expert freestylers are not simply reckless. Indeed, their relationship with risk appears to be highly calculated, judging from the various behaviours they adopt to minimise the risk of an accident occurring. Helmet wearing is the only risk management behaviour that is adopted less frequently as the individual level of ability increases. Such an attitude allows experts to test their own capacity for judgement and independent thought, while also demonstrating it to others. Thus, the relationship experts have with risk is shaped to a degree by their desire to feel part of a community and stand out from the crowd. The benefits expected from flirting with danger are the greatest and the most diverse among younger individuals. For these individuals, taking risks is a quest to find themselves and their limits and thus forge an identity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《Snowpark》用户与风险的多重关系
现在大多数雪上运动爱好者都会去雪上公园,即使只是偶尔。流行病学研究强调,与传统滑雪道相比,这些设施发生事故的概率很高。我们试图了解滑雪场的用户为什么以及如何应对这些危险。通过一项基于问卷的调查,确定了骑手所采用的表征和行为,该调查是在定性研究的初始阶段之后开发的。年龄和专业水平是滑雪场用户与风险关系的两个主要标准。除了少数例外,每个自由泳高手都有过某种程度的严重受伤。与此同时,专业的自由泳运动员会“否认”他们的运动所涉及的危险。然而,专业的自由泳运动员并不是简单的鲁莽。事实上,他们与风险的关系似乎是经过高度计算的,从他们采取的各种行为来判断,以尽量减少事故发生的风险。随着个人能力水平的提高,佩戴头盔是唯一一种被较少采用的风险管理行为。这种态度可以让专家测试自己的判断能力和独立思考能力,同时也可以向他人展示。因此,专家与风险的关系在一定程度上是由他们渴望成为社区的一部分并从人群中脱颖而出的愿望所塑造的。在年轻的个体中,与危险调情的好处是最大的,也是最多样化的。对这些人来说,冒险是一种寻找自我和极限的探索,从而形成一种身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal for Sport and Society
European Journal for Sport and Society HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The contested terrain of sport, media & indigenous representation: a case study of sámi sport organisation in Norway Invited editorial: concussion, causation and interdisciplinary research ‘Reimagining’ gender equality in media coverage?: feminist frameworks in European and Olympic portrayal guidelines ‘Yet, they didn’t sign me’: the production of precarity in amateur and semi-professional football in Nigeria ‘Forgive me for saying, but rugby is not a game for women:’ an exploration of contemporary attitudes towards women’s rugby union
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1