Financialization, Structural Power, and the Global Financial Crisis for Europe’s Core and Periphery

Nina Eichacker
{"title":"Financialization, Structural Power, and the Global Financial Crisis for Europe’s Core and Periphery","authors":"Nina Eichacker","doi":"10.1080/08911916.2022.2145676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), European governments intervened to support domestic financial systems; several years later, peripheral European economies were at greater risk of having domestic financial crises transform into fiscal crises. While mainstream economic thinking predicts financial markets will punish risky bank behavior with higher interest rates and punitive resolution measures, in fact, banks in core European economies, which engaged in riskier activity in the subprime mortgage market, faced preferential treatment in the aftermath of the GFC. This article argues that financialization, the increased structural economic power of financial institutions, increased the structural power of core members of the Eurozone to direct supranational policies after the GFC. It supports these claims with financial data from balance sheets for a sample of EU economies, as well as institutional analysis of the financial aspects of European integration, and the financial, monetary, and fiscal responses that followed the onset of the GFC. While banks in the Eurozone core were more likely to have engaged in risky behavior, they were more likely to receive liquidity assistance from monetary authorities like the Federal Reserve due to their activity in the US. As Eurozone governments consider how to respond to crises, such as the Covid-19 pandemic going forward, policies that more equitably support governments rescuing domestic financial actors should be considered in tandem with broader financial regulations of structurally important economic institutions.","PeriodicalId":44784,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2022.2145676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), European governments intervened to support domestic financial systems; several years later, peripheral European economies were at greater risk of having domestic financial crises transform into fiscal crises. While mainstream economic thinking predicts financial markets will punish risky bank behavior with higher interest rates and punitive resolution measures, in fact, banks in core European economies, which engaged in riskier activity in the subprime mortgage market, faced preferential treatment in the aftermath of the GFC. This article argues that financialization, the increased structural economic power of financial institutions, increased the structural power of core members of the Eurozone to direct supranational policies after the GFC. It supports these claims with financial data from balance sheets for a sample of EU economies, as well as institutional analysis of the financial aspects of European integration, and the financial, monetary, and fiscal responses that followed the onset of the GFC. While banks in the Eurozone core were more likely to have engaged in risky behavior, they were more likely to receive liquidity assistance from monetary authorities like the Federal Reserve due to their activity in the US. As Eurozone governments consider how to respond to crises, such as the Covid-19 pandemic going forward, policies that more equitably support governments rescuing domestic financial actors should be considered in tandem with broader financial regulations of structurally important economic institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融化、结构性权力与欧洲核心和外围的全球金融危机
摘要在全球金融危机(GFC)之后,欧洲各国政府进行了干预,以支持国内金融体系;几年后,欧洲外围经济体面临着国内金融危机转变为财政危机的更大风险。虽然主流经济思想预测金融市场将通过更高的利率和惩罚性的解决措施来惩罚银行的风险行为,但事实上,在次贷市场从事风险更高活动的欧洲核心经济体的银行在全球金融危机后面临着优惠待遇。本文认为,金融化,金融机构结构经济权力的增加,增加了欧元区核心成员在全球金融危机后指导超国家政策的结构权力。它通过欧盟经济体样本资产负债表中的金融数据,以及对欧洲一体化金融方面的机构分析,以及全球金融危机爆发后的金融、货币和财政应对措施,支持了这些说法。虽然欧元区核心区的银行更有可能从事风险行为,但由于它们在美国的活动,它们更有可能从美联储等货币当局获得流动性援助。随着欧元区各国政府考虑如何应对危机,如新冠肺炎大流行,更公平地支持政府救助国内金融行为体的政策,应与对结构重要的经济机构进行更广泛的金融监管相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Alain Parguez and Monetary Circuit Theory: Keys to Understanding the Development of Economies with a Double Monetary Standard Tilting at Windmills: Bernanke and Blanchard’s Obsession with the Wage-Price Spiral Inflation in France Since the 1960s: A Post-Keynesian Interpretation Using the Conflict-Inflation Model An Assessment of Pandemic Era Inflation, 2021–2022 Elaborating on the Demand-Side of Economic Development: Schumpeter and Neo-Schumpeterian Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1