Incidental great public spaces and the role of urban design in South Africa

IF 0.6 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING Town and Regional Planning Pub Date : 2018-12-11 DOI:10.18820/2415-0495/TRP73.1
D. Schoulund, K. Landman
{"title":"Incidental great public spaces and the role of urban design in South Africa","authors":"D. Schoulund, K. Landman","doi":"10.18820/2415-0495/TRP73.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban Design in South Africa as a formal profession has a relatively short history. However, in practice, there have been many examples of what must be considered both good and bad Urban Design. There have also been numerous debates at universities and conferences on what Urban Design should be. However, in the constant making and re-making of urban and rural space, Urban Design has a tenuous and weak presence. This article interrogates the rather low profile of Urban Design in the country and why it is not growing or better positioned compared to other countries. This is done through a discussion of three cases that illustrate the often incidental making of great public spaces in contrast to the thoroughly planned approach. The article argues that spontaneous projects of high quality, rather than over-planned projects, where shortcomings result from this preoccupation to rationalise, often have a greater potential to strengthen the role and value of Urban Design. Such an approach would favour incremental, flexible and sensitive proposals and interventions where spontaneity and adaptation are recognised and celebrated, as well as support the notion that urban design should set a framework for many role players to respond to in shaping the city. Keywords : Built environment, incidental public space, South Africa, urban design","PeriodicalId":42151,"journal":{"name":"Town and Regional Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Town and Regional Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/2415-0495/TRP73.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban Design in South Africa as a formal profession has a relatively short history. However, in practice, there have been many examples of what must be considered both good and bad Urban Design. There have also been numerous debates at universities and conferences on what Urban Design should be. However, in the constant making and re-making of urban and rural space, Urban Design has a tenuous and weak presence. This article interrogates the rather low profile of Urban Design in the country and why it is not growing or better positioned compared to other countries. This is done through a discussion of three cases that illustrate the often incidental making of great public spaces in contrast to the thoroughly planned approach. The article argues that spontaneous projects of high quality, rather than over-planned projects, where shortcomings result from this preoccupation to rationalise, often have a greater potential to strengthen the role and value of Urban Design. Such an approach would favour incremental, flexible and sensitive proposals and interventions where spontaneity and adaptation are recognised and celebrated, as well as support the notion that urban design should set a framework for many role players to respond to in shaping the city. Keywords : Built environment, incidental public space, South Africa, urban design
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偶然的大公共空间和南非城市设计的作用
城市设计在南非作为一种正式职业的历史相对较短。然而,在实践中,已经有许多必须被认为是好的和坏的城市设计的例子。在大学和会议上,关于城市设计应该是什么也有很多争论。然而,在城市和乡村空间的不断制造和重建中,城市设计的存在是脆弱的。这篇文章质疑了城市设计在国内相当低调,以及为什么与其他国家相比,它没有发展壮大或处于更好的地位。这是通过对三个案例的讨论来完成的,这些案例说明了与彻底规划的方法相比,通常是偶然建造大型公共空间。文章认为,高质量的自发项目,而不是过度规划的项目,这些项目的缺点是由于这种对合理化的关注造成的,通常更有可能加强城市设计的作用和价值。这种方法将有利于渐进、灵活和敏感的提案和干预措施,在这些提案和干预中,自发性和适应性得到认可和赞扬,并支持城市设计应为许多角色制定一个框架,让他们在塑造城市时做出回应。关键词:建筑环境,附带公共空间,南非,城市设计
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Town and Regional Planning
Town and Regional Planning REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban pressure on the Rietvlei Nature Reserve in Tshwane, South Africa: An application of the Greenspace Stress Model of Urban Impact A review of some of the criteria used in land-demarcation processes Conformity to zoned urban green spaces in physical development plans: A spatiotemporal analysis of Kisii Town, Kenya Gentrification in South Africa’s inner cities: Dignity takings requires restoration Differential urbanisation for settlement planning – A Western Cape case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1