Trends in muscular fitness performance among 9-12-year-olds: implications for monitoring and test selection

IF 0.7 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.15561/26649837.2023.0407
P. Schlegel, A. Křehký, Kateřina Havrdová, Denisa Dočkalová, Tereza Pavlíková
{"title":"Trends in muscular fitness performance among 9-12-year-olds: implications for monitoring and test selection","authors":"P. Schlegel, A. Křehký, Kateřina Havrdová, Denisa Dočkalová, Tereza Pavlíková","doi":"10.15561/26649837.2023.0407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Study Aim: Long-term trends in muscular fitness show a gradual decline, which has become even more intense due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Declines in muscular fitness are associated with deteriorated health and well-being parameters. It is crucial to monitor this decline and appropriate tests need to be selected and interpreted correctly. The aim of this research was to apply muscle fitness tests and compare the development of performance between 9 and 12-year-olds and, at the same time, to compare performance differences between boys and girls. \nMaterial and Methods: 225 girls and 259 boys aged 9 to 12 years (11.1 ± 0.9) took part in the studies. Seven tests were selected to assess muscular fitness: bent-arm hang (BAH), push-ups, sit-ups, standing broad jump (SBJ), medicine ball throw (MBT), handgrip dynamometry (handgrip), and pulling back-leg dynamometry (back-leg). Results: The results showed that the development curves of muscle tests are incomparable. A linear increase was recorded for the MBT test. The handgrip, back-leg, and MBT tests have similar development although they do not test the same type of force. A very different trend (stagnation, decline) was found for the BAH and push-up tests. Girls and boys showed a comparable trend in all tests, however, boys always had higher absolute performances. Conclusions: Our data are intended to contribute to the expert discussion on the choice of muscular fitness tests. Based on these results, the selection of multiple tests may be recommended for optimal assessment of muscular fitness. In future research, it would be advisable to follow up by testing a larger cohort.","PeriodicalId":52407,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2023.0407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Study Aim: Long-term trends in muscular fitness show a gradual decline, which has become even more intense due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Declines in muscular fitness are associated with deteriorated health and well-being parameters. It is crucial to monitor this decline and appropriate tests need to be selected and interpreted correctly. The aim of this research was to apply muscle fitness tests and compare the development of performance between 9 and 12-year-olds and, at the same time, to compare performance differences between boys and girls. Material and Methods: 225 girls and 259 boys aged 9 to 12 years (11.1 ± 0.9) took part in the studies. Seven tests were selected to assess muscular fitness: bent-arm hang (BAH), push-ups, sit-ups, standing broad jump (SBJ), medicine ball throw (MBT), handgrip dynamometry (handgrip), and pulling back-leg dynamometry (back-leg). Results: The results showed that the development curves of muscle tests are incomparable. A linear increase was recorded for the MBT test. The handgrip, back-leg, and MBT tests have similar development although they do not test the same type of force. A very different trend (stagnation, decline) was found for the BAH and push-up tests. Girls and boys showed a comparable trend in all tests, however, boys always had higher absolute performances. Conclusions: Our data are intended to contribute to the expert discussion on the choice of muscular fitness tests. Based on these results, the selection of multiple tests may be recommended for optimal assessment of muscular fitness. In future research, it would be advisable to follow up by testing a larger cohort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
9-12岁儿童肌肉健康表现的趋势:对监测和测试选择的影响
背景和研究目的:肌肉健康的长期趋势显示出逐渐下降,由于新冠肺炎大流行,这种趋势变得更加强烈。肌肉素质的下降与健康和幸福参数的恶化有关。监测这种下降至关重要,需要正确选择和解释适当的测试。这项研究的目的是应用肌肉素质测试,比较9岁和12岁儿童的表现发展,同时比较男孩和女孩的表现差异。材料和方法:225名9-12岁的女孩和259名男孩(11.1±0.9)参加了研究。选择了七项测试来评估肌肉素质:屈臂悬吊(BAH)、俯卧撑、仰卧起坐、站立跳远(SBJ)、健身球投掷(MBT)、握力测试(握力)和后腿力量测试(后腿)。结果:结果表明,肌肉测试的发育曲线是不可比拟的。MBT试验记录到线性增加。握力、后腿和MBT测试有着相似的发展,尽管它们不测试相同类型的力。BAH和俯卧撑测试发现了非常不同的趋势(停滞、下降)。女孩和男孩在所有测试中都表现出类似的趋势,然而,男孩的绝对成绩总是更高。结论:我们的数据有助于专家讨论肌肉素质测试的选择。基于这些结果,可以建议选择多种测试来最佳评估肌肉健康状况。在未来的研究中,建议通过测试更大的队列来跟进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The fundamental motor skills and motor coordination performance of children in West Sumatera Province, Indonesia Investigation of maximal strength performance in terms of training time routine Effect of mat pilates training program on functional fitness in older adults Teaching grassroots soccer: a systematic review of literature Does basketball training increase balance scores in children?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1