The growing global plastic waste problem - lessons for environmental economics policy design and choice

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Green Economics Pub Date : 2020-09-14 DOI:10.1504/ijge.2020.10032076
Kwami Adanu
{"title":"The growing global plastic waste problem - lessons for environmental economics policy design and choice","authors":"Kwami Adanu","doi":"10.1504/ijge.2020.10032076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common environmental economics instruments often used in addressing waste problems have suffered paralysis when it comes to resolving the global plastic waste problem. This study illustrates the use of an Environmental Solutions Decision-making Tree (ESD-Tree), and a plastic waste market in reversing the problem. Several interesting results emerge. These include, banning non-recyclable plastic bags for which the unit cost per use of a close substitute, is less or equal to the unit cost per use of the plastic, provided production of the substitute generates at least as many jobs as the plastic bag. Next, the results revealed that producer-ran and public-ran centres introduced in the proposed plastic waste market work together to eliminate incentives for market participants to deviate from equilibrium market prices. The study derived an implementable second-best tax which internalises plastic waste externalities, and provides an imperfect restoration of the social optimum in the plastic waste market.","PeriodicalId":35060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Green Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Green Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijge.2020.10032076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Common environmental economics instruments often used in addressing waste problems have suffered paralysis when it comes to resolving the global plastic waste problem. This study illustrates the use of an Environmental Solutions Decision-making Tree (ESD-Tree), and a plastic waste market in reversing the problem. Several interesting results emerge. These include, banning non-recyclable plastic bags for which the unit cost per use of a close substitute, is less or equal to the unit cost per use of the plastic, provided production of the substitute generates at least as many jobs as the plastic bag. Next, the results revealed that producer-ran and public-ran centres introduced in the proposed plastic waste market work together to eliminate incentives for market participants to deviate from equilibrium market prices. The study derived an implementable second-best tax which internalises plastic waste externalities, and provides an imperfect restoration of the social optimum in the plastic waste market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日益增长的全球塑料垃圾问题——环境经济政策设计和选择的教训
在解决全球塑料垃圾问题时,经常用于解决垃圾问题的常见环境经济学工具已经瘫痪。这项研究说明了环境解决方案决策树(ESD树)和塑料垃圾市场在扭转这一问题方面的作用。出现了几个有趣的结果。这些措施包括,禁止不可回收的塑料袋,因为每次使用紧密替代品的单位成本小于或等于每次使用塑料的单位成本,前提是生产替代品产生的就业机会至少与塑料袋一样多。接下来,研究结果显示,在拟议的塑料垃圾市场中引入的生产者经营和公共经营中心共同努力,消除了市场参与者偏离均衡市场价格的动机。该研究得出了一个可实施的第二好税,该税将塑料垃圾的外部性内化,并提供了塑料垃圾市场社会最优的不完美恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Green Economics
International Journal of Green Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: IJGE, a peer-reviewed international journal, proposes and fosters discussion on all aspects of Green Economics. It contributes to international research and practice in Green Economics with the aim of encouraging economic change and the positioning of Green Economics at the centre of the Economics disciplines. Green Economic theories and policies, tools, instruments and metrics are developed with the aim of offering practical and theoretical solutions and proposals to facilitate a change to the current economic models for the benefit of the widest number of people and the planet as a whole. IJGE focuses particularly on resource management, on meeting peoples’ needs and the impact and effects of international trends and how to increase social justice.
期刊最新文献
Importance of Social Videogaming for Connection with Others During the COVID-19 Pandemic. The eco-environmental costs of conflicts Customer attitudes towards organic products and their impact on satisfaction - an empirical study Four principles for a human rights-based approach to development without growth Evaluating the factors influencing consumers willingness to buy plant-based meat alternatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1