Evaluation of virtual environment as a form of interactive resuscitation exam

IF 1.4 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia Pub Date : 2017-10-02 DOI:10.1080/13614568.2017.1421717
Piotr Konrad Leszczyński, A. Charuta, B. Kolodziejczak, M. Roszak
{"title":"Evaluation of virtual environment as a form of interactive resuscitation exam","authors":"Piotr Konrad Leszczyński, A. Charuta, B. Kolodziejczak, M. Roszak","doi":"10.1080/13614568.2017.1421717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is scientific evidence confirming the effectiveness of e-learning within resuscitation, however, there is not enough research on modern examination techniques within the scope. The aim of the pilot research is to compare the exam results in the field of Advanced Life Support in a traditional (paper) and interactive (computer) form as well as to evaluate satisfaction of the participants. A survey was conducted which meant to evaluate satisfaction of exam participants. Statistical analysis of the collected data was conducted at a significance level of α = 0.05 using STATISTICS v. 12. Final results of the traditional exam (67.5% ± 15.8%) differed significantly (p < 0.001) from the results of the interactive exam (53.3% ± 13.7%). However, comparing the number of students who did not pass the exam (passing point at 51%), no significant differences (p = 0.13) were observed between the two types exams. The feedback accuracy as well as the presence of well-prepared interactive questions could influence the evaluation of satisfaction of taking part in the electronic test. Significant differences between the results of a traditional test and the one supported by Computer Based Learning system showed the possibility of achieving a more detailed competence verification in the field of resuscitation thanks to interactive solutions. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":54386,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia","volume":"23 1","pages":"265 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614568.2017.1421717","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2017.1421717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is scientific evidence confirming the effectiveness of e-learning within resuscitation, however, there is not enough research on modern examination techniques within the scope. The aim of the pilot research is to compare the exam results in the field of Advanced Life Support in a traditional (paper) and interactive (computer) form as well as to evaluate satisfaction of the participants. A survey was conducted which meant to evaluate satisfaction of exam participants. Statistical analysis of the collected data was conducted at a significance level of α = 0.05 using STATISTICS v. 12. Final results of the traditional exam (67.5% ± 15.8%) differed significantly (p < 0.001) from the results of the interactive exam (53.3% ± 13.7%). However, comparing the number of students who did not pass the exam (passing point at 51%), no significant differences (p = 0.13) were observed between the two types exams. The feedback accuracy as well as the presence of well-prepared interactive questions could influence the evaluation of satisfaction of taking part in the electronic test. Significant differences between the results of a traditional test and the one supported by Computer Based Learning system showed the possibility of achieving a more detailed competence verification in the field of resuscitation thanks to interactive solutions. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟环境评估作为一种交互式复苏考试形式
有科学证据证实了电子学习在复苏中的有效性,然而,在这一范围内对现代检查技术的研究还不够。试点研究的目的是比较传统(纸质)和交互式(计算机)形式的高级生命支持领域的考试结果,并评估参与者的满意度。进行了一项调查,旨在评估考试参与者的满意度。采用STATISTICS v. 12对收集的数据进行统计学分析,显著性水平为α = 0.05。传统考试的最终结果(67.5%±15.8%)与交互式考试的最终结果(53.3%±13.7%)差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。然而,比较未通过考试的学生人数(及格点为51%),两种类型的考试之间没有显著差异(p = 0.13)。反馈的准确性以及精心准备的互动问题的存在会影响参与电子测试满意度的评价。传统测试结果与基于计算机的学习系统支持的结果之间的显着差异表明,由于交互式解决方案,有可能在复苏领域实现更详细的能力验证。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia (NRHM) is an interdisciplinary journal providing a focus for research covering practical and theoretical developments in hypermedia, hypertext, and interactive multimedia.
期刊最新文献
Geo-spatial hypertext in virtual reality: mapping and navigating global news event spaces User-centred collecting for emerging formats The evolution of the author—authorship and speculative worldbuilding in Johannes Heldén’s Evolution From “screen-as-writing” theory to Internet culturology. A French perspective on digital textualities Pasifika arts Aotearoa and Wikipedia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1