Does Livelihood and Asset Diversification Contribute to Pastoralist Resilience?: the Case of Il Chamus, Baringo County, Kenya, 1980-2018

IF 1.1 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Nomadic Peoples Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.3197/np.2021.250202
P. Little
{"title":"Does Livelihood and Asset Diversification Contribute to Pastoralist Resilience?: the Case of Il Chamus, Baringo County, Kenya, 1980-2018","authors":"P. Little","doi":"10.3197/np.2021.250202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In studies of pastoralism, the concept of resilience has normally been applied to the analyses of post-shock recoveries ('bounce backs') within an ecological framework and and limited time and spatial perspectives. When temporal and spatial parameters are relaxed to span multiple decades\n and geographies with widespread social changes and numerous shocks and recovery periods, understanding what resilience for pastoralists should look like is exceedingly complex and challenging. This article examines livelihood and asset diversification among Il Chamus of Baringo County, Kenya\n over a 35+ year period (1980-2018) in the context of significant changes. It suggests that 'successful resilience' among pastoralists involves much more than the continuity of a pastoralist livelihood in a particular place. By addressing diversification trends among households both in towns\n and rural spaces, the study shows that both better-off and poor households pursue non-pastoral strategies and assets, and that livestock remains an important real and symbolic form of capital even for those who work in towns. Finally, the article concludes that studies of pastoralist resilience\n should consider long-term continuities and changes associated with market expansion and the strengthening of rural-town linkages, in order to understand how pastoral livelihoods evolve not just in response to short-term shocks but also to challenges and opportunities that wider socio-economic\n changes present.","PeriodicalId":19318,"journal":{"name":"Nomadic Peoples","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nomadic Peoples","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3197/np.2021.250202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In studies of pastoralism, the concept of resilience has normally been applied to the analyses of post-shock recoveries ('bounce backs') within an ecological framework and and limited time and spatial perspectives. When temporal and spatial parameters are relaxed to span multiple decades and geographies with widespread social changes and numerous shocks and recovery periods, understanding what resilience for pastoralists should look like is exceedingly complex and challenging. This article examines livelihood and asset diversification among Il Chamus of Baringo County, Kenya over a 35+ year period (1980-2018) in the context of significant changes. It suggests that 'successful resilience' among pastoralists involves much more than the continuity of a pastoralist livelihood in a particular place. By addressing diversification trends among households both in towns and rural spaces, the study shows that both better-off and poor households pursue non-pastoral strategies and assets, and that livestock remains an important real and symbolic form of capital even for those who work in towns. Finally, the article concludes that studies of pastoralist resilience should consider long-term continuities and changes associated with market expansion and the strengthening of rural-town linkages, in order to understand how pastoral livelihoods evolve not just in response to short-term shocks but also to challenges and opportunities that wider socio-economic changes present.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生计和资产多元化是否有助于牧民的复原力?:1980-2018年肯尼亚巴林戈县Il Chamus案
在畜牧业研究中,复原力的概念通常被应用于在生态框架内以及有限的时间和空间视角下对冲击后恢复(“反弹”)的分析。当时间和空间参数被放宽到跨越几十年和具有广泛社会变化和无数冲击和恢复期的地理位置时,理解牧民的复原力应该是什么样子是极其复杂和具有挑战性的。本文考察了肯尼亚巴林戈县Il Chamus在35多年的时间里(1980-2018)在重大变化的背景下的生计和资产多样化。它表明,牧民的“成功复原力”远不止涉及牧民在特定地方生计的连续性。通过解决城镇和农村家庭的多样化趋势,研究表明,富裕家庭和贫困家庭都追求非牧业战略和资产,即使对在城镇工作的人来说,牲畜仍然是一种重要的真实和象征性的资本形式。最后,文章得出结论,牧民复原力研究应考虑与市场扩张和加强城乡联系相关的长期持续性和变化,以了解牧民生计如何演变,不仅是为了应对短期冲击,也是为了应对更广泛的社会经济变化带来的挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nomadic Peoples
Nomadic Peoples ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Nomadic Peoples is an international journal published for the Commission on Nomadic Peoples, International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. Its primary concerns are the current circumstances of all nomadic peoples around the world and their prospects. Its readership includes all those interested in nomadic peoples—scholars, researchers, planners and project administrators.
期刊最新文献
Sedentist Epidemiology: COVID-19 Policies and Pastoral Mobility in Turkana County, Kenya Legal Ambiguity and Land Dispossession: Multi-Scale Conflicting Views on Territorial Authority at the Herlen Bayan-Ulaan State Reserve Pasture Area, Mongolia. Seeing Cattle like a State: Sedentist Assumptions of the Namibian Livestock Identification and Traceability System Concluding Commentary No Option but to Settle! The Community Land Act, Devolution and Pastoralism in Samburu County, Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1