967-P: Evaluation of CV and SD as Glucose Variability Metrics Based on Data from the GOLD and SILVER Trials

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.2337/db23-967-p
Pavel J. Fatulla, Henrik Imberg, I. Hirsch, T. Heise, M. Lind
{"title":"967-P: Evaluation of CV and SD as Glucose Variability Metrics Based on Data from the GOLD and SILVER Trials","authors":"Pavel J. Fatulla, Henrik Imberg, I. Hirsch, T. Heise, M. Lind","doi":"10.2337/db23-967-p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Coefficient of variation (CV) and standard deviation (SD) are key metrics of glucose variability (GV) in clinical care and research. We evaluated the adequacy of CV and SD as GV metrics over a wide range of mean blood glucose (MBG) levels in people with (T1D).\n Methods: Analyses were performed on data from the randomized clinical GOLD and SILVER trials (n=160). Mixed effects models were used to evaluate the SD in relation to MBG during stable therapy, accounting for subject-specific trends and correlations in repeated measures data.\n Results: The SD of blood glucose levels did not increase linearly with MBG level during CGM and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) treatments (both p<0.0001). The lack-of-fit of the constant CV model was most distinct at high glucose levels >12 mmol/L (Fig.). During BGM, a 33% reduction in MBG from 12 to 8 mmol/L was associated with a 20% (95% CI 14.9 to 24.9%) reduction in SD. The treatment effect on MBG-adjusted GV measured by CV was underestimated by 27%, compared to an adjusted analysis accounting for a quadratic relation between SD and MBG.\n Conclusion: CV is not an optimal GV measure since SD changes less than the MBG during stable glucose-lowering therapy. A quadratic model adjusting SD to MBG is instead suggested when evaluating glucose-lowering therapies in people with T1D.\n Fig. - Association between SD and MBG in the GOLD and SILVER trials during stable glucose-monitoring method CGM/SMBG.\n \n \n \n P.J.Fatulla: None. H.Imberg: None. I.B.Hirsch: Consultant; Abbott Diabetes, Lifecare, Inc., Hagar, Research Support; Beta Bionics, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Dexcom, Inc. T.Heise: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk, Consultant; Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Research Support; Adocia, AstraZeneca, Biocon, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Genova, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk. M.Lind: Consultant; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Eli Lilly and Company.\n","PeriodicalId":11376,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/db23-967-p","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Coefficient of variation (CV) and standard deviation (SD) are key metrics of glucose variability (GV) in clinical care and research. We evaluated the adequacy of CV and SD as GV metrics over a wide range of mean blood glucose (MBG) levels in people with (T1D). Methods: Analyses were performed on data from the randomized clinical GOLD and SILVER trials (n=160). Mixed effects models were used to evaluate the SD in relation to MBG during stable therapy, accounting for subject-specific trends and correlations in repeated measures data. Results: The SD of blood glucose levels did not increase linearly with MBG level during CGM and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) treatments (both p<0.0001). The lack-of-fit of the constant CV model was most distinct at high glucose levels >12 mmol/L (Fig.). During BGM, a 33% reduction in MBG from 12 to 8 mmol/L was associated with a 20% (95% CI 14.9 to 24.9%) reduction in SD. The treatment effect on MBG-adjusted GV measured by CV was underestimated by 27%, compared to an adjusted analysis accounting for a quadratic relation between SD and MBG. Conclusion: CV is not an optimal GV measure since SD changes less than the MBG during stable glucose-lowering therapy. A quadratic model adjusting SD to MBG is instead suggested when evaluating glucose-lowering therapies in people with T1D. Fig. - Association between SD and MBG in the GOLD and SILVER trials during stable glucose-monitoring method CGM/SMBG. P.J.Fatulla: None. H.Imberg: None. I.B.Hirsch: Consultant; Abbott Diabetes, Lifecare, Inc., Hagar, Research Support; Beta Bionics, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Dexcom, Inc. T.Heise: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk, Consultant; Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Research Support; Adocia, AstraZeneca, Biocon, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Genova, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk. M.Lind: Consultant; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Eli Lilly and Company.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
967-P:基于GOLD和SILVER试验数据的CV和SD作为葡萄糖变异性指标的评价
目的:变异系数(CV)和标准差(SD)是临床护理和研究中葡萄糖变异性(GV)的关键指标。我们评估了(T1D)患者的CV和SD作为GV指标在大范围平均血糖(MBG)水平上的充分性。方法:对随机临床GOLD和SILVER试验(n=160)的数据进行分析。混合效应模型用于评估稳定治疗期间与MBG相关的SD,考虑受试者的特定趋势和重复测量数据中的相关性。结果:在CGM和血糖监测(BGM)治疗期间,血糖水平的SD并没有随着MBG水平线性增加(均为12 mmol/L(图)。在BGM期间,MBG从12 mmol/L减少33%与SD减少20%(95%CI 14.9至24.9%)相关。CV测量的MBG调节GV的治疗效果被低估了27%,与考虑SD和MBG之间的二次关系的调整后的分析相比。结论:CV不是一种最佳的GV测量方法,因为在稳定的降糖治疗中,SD的变化小于MBG。在评估T1D患者的降血糖治疗时,建议采用将SD调整为MBG的二次模型。图-稳定血糖监测方法CGM/SMBG中GOLD和SILVER试验中SD和MBG之间的关联。P.J.Fatulla:没有。H.因伯格:没有。I.B.Hirsch:顾问;Abbott Diabetes,Lifecare,股份有限公司,Hagar,研究支持;Beta Bionics,股份有限公司,Insulet公司,Dexcom,股份有限公司T.Heise:咨询小组;诺和诺德,顾问;甘李制药,研究支持;Adocia、AstraZeneca、Biocon、Crinetics Pharmaceuticals、股份有限公司、Eli Lilly and Company、Genova、Novo Nordisk、Sanofi、Zealand Pharma A/S发言人团;礼来公司,诺和诺德。M.Lind:顾问;阿斯利康,礼来公司,诺和诺德,研究支持;礼来公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes
Diabetes 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1968
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetes is a scientific journal that publishes original research exploring the physiological and pathophysiological aspects of diabetes mellitus. We encourage submissions of manuscripts pertaining to laboratory, animal, or human research, covering a wide range of topics. Our primary focus is on investigative reports investigating various aspects such as the development and progression of diabetes, along with its associated complications. We also welcome studies delving into normal and pathological pancreatic islet function and intermediary metabolism, as well as exploring the mechanisms of drug and hormone action from a pharmacological perspective. Additionally, we encourage submissions that delve into the biochemical and molecular aspects of both normal and abnormal biological processes. However, it is important to note that we do not publish studies relating to diabetes education or the application of accepted therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to patients with diabetes mellitus. Our aim is to provide a platform for research that contributes to advancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes of diabetes.
期刊最新文献
A Special Thanks to the Reviewers of Diabetes Hepatic PKA Mediates the Liver and Pancreatic Alpha-Cell Crosstalk Cardioprotection during myocardial infarction in diabetic cardiomyopathy Novel cell-to-cell communications between macrophages and fibroblasts regulate obesity-induced adipose tissue fibrosis Soluble HLA class I is released from human β-cells following exposure to interferons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1