Self-disclosure of concealable stigmatized identities: A dyadic longitudinal investigation guided by the contact hypothesis

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2022-08-07 DOI:10.1111/josi.12543
Taylor Ballinger, Amy Canevello, Jennifer Crocker, Tao Jiang, Diane M. Quinn
{"title":"Self-disclosure of concealable stigmatized identities: A dyadic longitudinal investigation guided by the contact hypothesis","authors":"Taylor Ballinger,&nbsp;Amy Canevello,&nbsp;Jennifer Crocker,&nbsp;Tao Jiang,&nbsp;Diane M. Quinn","doi":"10.1111/josi.12543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stigma reduction research finds that brief interactions with a person with mental illness can reduce prejudiced attitudes. We examined whether this finding extends to real relationships over an extended period of time. First-year college roommate dyads, one of whom reported a mental illness diagnosis participated in a longitudinal study (<i>N</i> = 166 dyads across three American universities). Based on contact theory, we tested whether mental illness prejudice declines when: (a) the student with mental illness disclosed that information to their roommate; (b) the roommate perceived the disclosure; and (c) the roommate relationship was close. Registered analyses showed that student disclosure predicted roommate perception (<i>β</i> = .52, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), but roommate perception of the disclosure did not significantly predict reduced prejudice from the start to the end of the academic year (<i>β</i> = −.13, <i>p</i> = .172). Relationship closeness did not moderate how likely roommates were to perceive students’ disclosures. Notably, overall levels of mental illness prejudice were very low in this American college sample, suggesting that the value of stigma interventions may depend on the context. Directions for future research and social policy implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12543","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Stigma reduction research finds that brief interactions with a person with mental illness can reduce prejudiced attitudes. We examined whether this finding extends to real relationships over an extended period of time. First-year college roommate dyads, one of whom reported a mental illness diagnosis participated in a longitudinal study (N = 166 dyads across three American universities). Based on contact theory, we tested whether mental illness prejudice declines when: (a) the student with mental illness disclosed that information to their roommate; (b) the roommate perceived the disclosure; and (c) the roommate relationship was close. Registered analyses showed that student disclosure predicted roommate perception (β = .52, p < .001), but roommate perception of the disclosure did not significantly predict reduced prejudice from the start to the end of the academic year (β = −.13, p = .172). Relationship closeness did not moderate how likely roommates were to perceive students’ disclosures. Notably, overall levels of mental illness prejudice were very low in this American college sample, suggesting that the value of stigma interventions may depend on the context. Directions for future research and social policy implications are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐性污名化身份的自我披露:接触假说指导下的二元纵向调查
减少耻辱感的研究发现,与精神疾病患者的短暂互动可以减少偏见态度。我们研究了这一发现是否适用于长期的真实关系。大学一年级室友二人组,其中一人报告患有精神疾病,参与了一项纵向研究(美国三所大学的166对二人组)。基于接触理论,我们测试了心理疾病偏见在以下情况下是否会下降:(a)有心理疾病的学生将这些信息透露给他们的室友;(b)室友察觉到该披露;(3)室友关系很亲密。注册分析显示,学生披露可以预测室友感知(β = 0.52, p <.001),但室友对披露的感知并不能显著预测从学年开始到学年结束时偏见的减少(β =−)。13, p = .172)。亲密关系并没有调节室友对学生信息披露的感知程度。值得注意的是,在这个美国大学样本中,精神疾病偏见的总体水平非常低,这表明污名化干预的价值可能取决于环境。讨论了未来的研究方向和社会政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial correlates of LGBTIQ+ experiences in selected African countries: Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research Understanding variations in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across space and time: The importance of norm perceptions and political dynamics Centering the margins: Reimagining resilience and resistance for transgender and nonbinary people of color The opportunities and limits of open science for LGBTIQ+ research Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1