Quantification of blood loss in obstetric haemorrhage: implications on intervention and transfusion

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Pub Date : 2023-06-10 DOI:10.1111/tog.12886
Noreen Haque, R. Roberts, B. Kumar
{"title":"Quantification of blood loss in obstetric haemorrhage: implications on intervention and transfusion","authors":"Noreen Haque, R. Roberts, B. Kumar","doi":"10.1111/tog.12886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postpartum haemorrhage accounts for 27% of all maternal deaths. Incorrect quantification of blood loss can lead to unnecessary interventions, such as the transfusion of blood products, which is not without risk. During pregnancy, cardiovascular changes may explain how blood loss can occur rapidly, with pregnant women tolerating large volumes of blood loss before a change in clinical signs is seen. Several methods are used to quantify blood loss, such as visual estimation, volumetric, gravimetric, colorimetric and photometric. The Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales (OBS Cymru) project, which standardised management of obstetric haemorrhage in Wales using a four‐stage approach, showed a statistically significant improvement in outcomes. Different definitions of postpartum haemorrhage make it difficult to compare available evidence. Further studies are required combining the use of point‐of‐care tests and quantitative techniques to help improve morbidity and mortality associated with obstetric haemorrhage.","PeriodicalId":51862,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postpartum haemorrhage accounts for 27% of all maternal deaths. Incorrect quantification of blood loss can lead to unnecessary interventions, such as the transfusion of blood products, which is not without risk. During pregnancy, cardiovascular changes may explain how blood loss can occur rapidly, with pregnant women tolerating large volumes of blood loss before a change in clinical signs is seen. Several methods are used to quantify blood loss, such as visual estimation, volumetric, gravimetric, colorimetric and photometric. The Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales (OBS Cymru) project, which standardised management of obstetric haemorrhage in Wales using a four‐stage approach, showed a statistically significant improvement in outcomes. Different definitions of postpartum haemorrhage make it difficult to compare available evidence. Further studies are required combining the use of point‐of‐care tests and quantitative techniques to help improve morbidity and mortality associated with obstetric haemorrhage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科出血失血量的量化:对干预和输血的影响
产后出血占所有产妇死亡的27%。对失血量的不正确量化可能导致不必要的干预,例如输血,这并非没有风险。在怀孕期间,心血管变化可能解释了失血是如何迅速发生的,孕妇在临床症状发生变化之前就可以忍受大量失血。有几种方法可用于量化失血量,如目测法、容量法、重量法、比色法和光度法。威尔士产科出血策略(OBS-Cymru)项目采用四阶段方法对威尔士产科出血的管理进行了标准化,结果显示出统计学上的显著改善。产后出血的不同定义使得比较现有证据变得困难。需要结合使用护理点测试和定量技术进行进一步研究,以帮助提高产科出血的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
Obstetrician & Gynaecologist OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
7.10%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
A focus on progestogens in hormone replacement therapy Re: Advanced abdominal pregnancy: challenges, update and review current management What's new in guidance: Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) update What I've learnt… with Prof James Drife CPD questions for volume 25 issue 4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1