Convergence in Mixed Effects Logistic Regression Models

Alexandrea Churchill, G. Kissling
{"title":"Convergence in Mixed Effects Logistic Regression Models","authors":"Alexandrea Churchill, G. Kissling","doi":"10.22186/JYI.36.2.18-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"relations had been taken into account, the results would not have been significant. It has been previously reported that litter effects are a characteristic of dose response data and therefore, within-litter correlation must be included when conducting statistical analyses (Khera et al., 1989; Kupper et al., 1986). When the response is a continuous measure, adjusting for within-litter correlations is simple (Haseman and Kupper, 1979; Searle, 1971). To adjust for the within-litter correlation, when the continuous measure is normally distributed, a nested analysis of variance can be implemented (Haseman and Kupper, 1979). One paper states that adjusting for within-litter correlations is more difficult when the response is dichotomous and rare, such as the occurrence of less common tumors (Haseman and Kupper, 1979). Different statistical models have been created to include litter effect, with many undergoing constant improvement (Yamamoto and Yanagimoto, 1994). Some models must be altered to incorporate litter effect, including the dose response model (Khera et al., 1989). Haseman and Soares (1976) concluded that, when analyzing experiments that look at dichotomous fetal responses, binomial or Poisson models provide poor fits, as there is similarity between responses from the same litter (Kupper et al., 1986). It also seems that certain models such as multistage, multihit and probit, which multiple authors have used, tend to ignore litter effects (Scientific Committee of the Food Safety Council, 1978, cited in Kupper et al., 1986; Segreti, and Munson, 1981; Kupper et al., 1986; Segreti, and Munson, 1981). The beta-binomial model, considered by Williams (1975), is commonly used to account for littermate correlation when analyzing dose response data (Kupper et al., 1986; Khera et al., 1989; Convergence in Mixed Effects Logistic Regression Models","PeriodicalId":74021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of young investigators","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of young investigators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22186/JYI.36.2.18-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

relations had been taken into account, the results would not have been significant. It has been previously reported that litter effects are a characteristic of dose response data and therefore, within-litter correlation must be included when conducting statistical analyses (Khera et al., 1989; Kupper et al., 1986). When the response is a continuous measure, adjusting for within-litter correlations is simple (Haseman and Kupper, 1979; Searle, 1971). To adjust for the within-litter correlation, when the continuous measure is normally distributed, a nested analysis of variance can be implemented (Haseman and Kupper, 1979). One paper states that adjusting for within-litter correlations is more difficult when the response is dichotomous and rare, such as the occurrence of less common tumors (Haseman and Kupper, 1979). Different statistical models have been created to include litter effect, with many undergoing constant improvement (Yamamoto and Yanagimoto, 1994). Some models must be altered to incorporate litter effect, including the dose response model (Khera et al., 1989). Haseman and Soares (1976) concluded that, when analyzing experiments that look at dichotomous fetal responses, binomial or Poisson models provide poor fits, as there is similarity between responses from the same litter (Kupper et al., 1986). It also seems that certain models such as multistage, multihit and probit, which multiple authors have used, tend to ignore litter effects (Scientific Committee of the Food Safety Council, 1978, cited in Kupper et al., 1986; Segreti, and Munson, 1981; Kupper et al., 1986; Segreti, and Munson, 1981). The beta-binomial model, considered by Williams (1975), is commonly used to account for littermate correlation when analyzing dose response data (Kupper et al., 1986; Khera et al., 1989; Convergence in Mixed Effects Logistic Regression Models
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合效应Logistic回归模型的收敛性
如果考虑到两国关系,结果就不会很显著。先前有报道称,枯枝落叶层效应是剂量反应数据的一个特征,因此,在进行统计分析时,必须包括枯枝落叶内部的相关性(Khera等人,1989;Kupper等人,1986年)。当反应是连续测量时,调整窝内相关性很简单(Haseman和Kupper,1979;Searle,1971)。为了调整窝内相关性,当连续测度正态分布时,可以进行嵌套方差分析(Haseman和Kupper,1979)。一篇论文指出,当反应是二分法和罕见的,例如不太常见的肿瘤的发生时,调整窝内相关性会更加困难(Haseman和Kupper,1979)。已经创建了不同的统计模型来包括枯枝落叶效应,其中许多模型正在不断改进(Yamamoto和Yanagimoto,1994)。必须修改一些模型以纳入枯枝落叶效应,包括剂量反应模型(Khera等人,1989)。Haseman和Soares(1976)得出结论,当分析观察二分胎儿反应的实验时,二项式或泊松模型提供了较差的拟合,因为来自同一窝的反应之间存在相似性(Kupper等人,1986)。多位作者使用的某些模型,如多级、多次命中和概率概率,似乎也倾向于忽略垃圾效应(食品安全委员会科学委员会,1978年,Kupper等人,1986年引用;Segreti和Munson,1981年;Kupper等人,1986年;Segrei和Munson(1981年)。Williams(1975)认为,在分析剂量反应数据时,β二项式模型通常用于解释同窝出生的相关性(Kupper等人,1986;Khera等人,1989;混合效应Logistic回归模型的收敛性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated Exposure Notification for COVID-19. Does Providing Hiding Spaces for Zebrafish in Large Groups Reduce Aggressive Behaviour? Structural Analysis of a New Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-glucosidase Homology Model and Identification of Potential Inhibitor Enzyme Docking Sites The Engineering of Natural Killer Cells as an Emerging Adoptive Cancer Immunotherapy A Novel Nickel-Titanium Wire-Actuated Prosthetic Motor Clutch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1