Shared management in emergency care services: mixed methods study

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Acta Paulista De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0148333
Elaine Cantarella Lima, José Luís Guedes dos Santos, A. P. Balsanelli, Rosangela Andrade Aukar de Camargo, Ariane Maria Machado Maximiano, Jaine Novais da Silva, Andréa Bernardes
{"title":"Shared management in emergency care services: mixed methods study","authors":"Elaine Cantarella Lima, José Luís Guedes dos Santos, A. P. Balsanelli, Rosangela Andrade Aukar de Camargo, Ariane Maria Machado Maximiano, Jaine Novais da Silva, Andréa Bernardes","doi":"10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0148333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the management model adopted in Emergency Services in municipalities that are part of a Regional Health Department.\n\nMethods: Mixed methods study with a concomitantly incorporated design. It was conducted in 2017 with six managers and 223 health workers (physicians, nurses and nursing technicians/assistants) from ten Emergency Care Units in eight municipalities of the Regional Health Department XIII, São Paulo. The data collection instrument composed of six closed questions and four open questions was delivered to participants. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; qualitative data were developed using the Collective Subject Discourse technique and analyzed using the DSCSoft® software.\n\nResults: There was a predominance of female professionals, 173 (75.2%), in the position of nursing assistants, 78 (33.9%). Managers evaluated the institution’s management model as contemporary and participatory, enabling workers to participate in decision making and giving them autonomy to decide on day-to-day issues, while workers evaluated it as traditional management, highlighting its formal structure.\n\nConclusion: It was observed that managers and workers have a different view of the management model of health institutions. The assumptions of the shared management model encompass valuable concepts, such as dialogic communication, decentralization of power and greater autonomy for decision making. However, when analyzing the opinion of most workers who participated in this study, the wide use of a hierarchical model in institutions is still observed.","PeriodicalId":6891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0148333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the management model adopted in Emergency Services in municipalities that are part of a Regional Health Department. Methods: Mixed methods study with a concomitantly incorporated design. It was conducted in 2017 with six managers and 223 health workers (physicians, nurses and nursing technicians/assistants) from ten Emergency Care Units in eight municipalities of the Regional Health Department XIII, São Paulo. The data collection instrument composed of six closed questions and four open questions was delivered to participants. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; qualitative data were developed using the Collective Subject Discourse technique and analyzed using the DSCSoft® software. Results: There was a predominance of female professionals, 173 (75.2%), in the position of nursing assistants, 78 (33.9%). Managers evaluated the institution’s management model as contemporary and participatory, enabling workers to participate in decision making and giving them autonomy to decide on day-to-day issues, while workers evaluated it as traditional management, highlighting its formal structure. Conclusion: It was observed that managers and workers have a different view of the management model of health institutions. The assumptions of the shared management model encompass valuable concepts, such as dialogic communication, decentralization of power and greater autonomy for decision making. However, when analyzing the opinion of most workers who participated in this study, the wide use of a hierarchical model in institutions is still observed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急救服务共享管理:混合方法研究
目的:分析某地区卫生局所属城市急诊服务部门的管理模式。方法:采用合并设计的混合方法研究。2017年,来自圣保罗市第十三区卫生部门八个城市的十个急诊单位的六名管理人员和223名卫生工作者(医生、护士和护理技术人员/助理)参与了这项调查。数据收集工具由6个封闭式问题和4个开放式问题组成,分发给与会者。定量资料采用描述性统计分析;使用集体主体话语技术开发定性数据,并使用DSCSoft®软件进行分析。结果:护理助理员中女性占优势,有173人(75.2%),78人(33.9%)。管理人员评价该机构的管理模式为现代和参与式的,使工人参与决策,并赋予他们自主决定日常问题,而工人评价它为传统管理,突出其正式结构。结论:观察到管理者和员工对卫生机构管理模式的看法存在差异。共享管理模式的假设包含有价值的概念,如对话沟通、权力下放和更大的决策自主权。然而,在分析参与本研究的大多数工人的意见时,仍然观察到在机构中广泛使用分层模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paulista de Enfermagem – (Acta Paul Enferm.), ISSN 1982-0194, is a [bilingual] technical-scientific electronic publication of the Escola Paulista de Enfermagem – EPE, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP. Our mission: To disseminate the scientific knowledge generated within the rigor of research and ethics methodology. Our objective: To publish results of original research for advancement of practices of clinical, surgical, and management nursing, as well as education, research, and information and communication technology.
期刊最新文献
Hospitalização de idosos por COVID-19 no Paraná: uma análise de fatores associados Higiene das mãos dos profissionais de saúde: perspectivas do estudante de enfermagem no papel de paciente/familiar COVID-19 nas prisões: validação de um inquérito de conhecimento, atitude e prática Diagrama de prevenção de quedas para pessoas idosas: revisão integrativa Recusa familiar para doação de córneas para transplante: fatores associados e tendência
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1