Safe Sisters: A Sorority-Based Bystander Intervention Program to Prevent Sexual Assault

IF 1 Q2 Social Sciences Journal of College Counseling Pub Date : 2020-10-09 DOI:10.1002/jocc.12170
Rachel P. Feldwisch, Susan C. Whiston, Isabella J. Arackal
{"title":"Safe Sisters: A Sorority-Based Bystander Intervention Program to Prevent Sexual Assault","authors":"Rachel P. Feldwisch,&nbsp;Susan C. Whiston,&nbsp;Isabella J. Arackal","doi":"10.1002/jocc.12170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined the effectiveness of Safe Sisters, a sexual assault bystander intervention program that targets members of college sororities. Analysis of covariance results show significant differences between treatment and waitlist control groups on posttest scores for action, bystander efficacy, intent to help friends, and intent to help strangers. Significant differences are not shown between treatment and waitlist control groups on posttest scores for precontemplation, contemplation, and rape myth acceptance. Limitations and implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jocc.12170","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocc.12170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of Safe Sisters, a sexual assault bystander intervention program that targets members of college sororities. Analysis of covariance results show significant differences between treatment and waitlist control groups on posttest scores for action, bystander efficacy, intent to help friends, and intent to help strangers. Significant differences are not shown between treatment and waitlist control groups on posttest scores for precontemplation, contemplation, and rape myth acceptance. Limitations and implications are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全姐妹:一个基于联谊会的旁观者干预计划,以防止性侵
这项研究考察了“安全姐妹”的有效性,这是一个针对大学姐妹会成员的性侵犯旁观者干预项目。协方差分析结果显示,治疗组和候补组在行动、旁观者效能、帮助朋友的意图和帮助陌生人的意图的测试后得分上存在显著差异。治疗组和等候名单控制组在事前沉思、沉思和强奸神话接受度的测试后得分上没有显着差异。讨论了局限性和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of College Counseling
Journal of College Counseling PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of College Counseling, a publication of the American College Counseling Association, is issued twice yearly. ACCA members receive the Journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Factors Predicting Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practice Among College Counselors Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Group Format for College Students LGBTQ+ Structural Stigma and College Counseling Center Website Friendliness Gifted University Students: Development and Evaluation of a Counseling Program Predictors of Academic Distress Among Military and Nonmilitary College Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1