A narrative review of the role of prostatic artery embolization in the management of post-radiation prostatitis

N. Parikh, B. Manley, J. Pow-Sang, K. Yamoah
{"title":"A narrative review of the role of prostatic artery embolization in the management of post-radiation prostatitis","authors":"N. Parikh, B. Manley, J. Pow-Sang, K. Yamoah","doi":"10.21037/AMJ-20-189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Definitive radiation remains a mainstay of treatment for men who have been diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Acute and chronic genitourinary (GU) toxicity after definitive radiotherapy (RT) can cause significant morbidity for patients. Furthermore, pinpointing the prostate and related prostatitis as the source of symptoms is very difficult and often comes down to a process of elimination. The pathophysiology underlying this prostatitis represents an even more frustrating challenge and is also poorly understood. When it has been identified as the source, radiation-induced prostatitis can be considered a form of chronic, non-bacterial prostatitis based on the NIH classification system. In this classification, radiationinduced prostatitis is exceedingly challenging to manage, with therapy focused on the three “A”s of chronic prostatitis: Anti-inflammatories, Antibiotics, and Alpha-blockers. Unfortunately, approximately 50% of men will have symptoms refractory to medical therapy with limited effectiveness of alternative medical and invasive options. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been shown to be a minimally invasive, safe and clinically effective treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). While evidence for both the diagnosis and management of post-radiation prostatitis is significantly lacking, this review evaluates the novel role of PAE for the management of refractory, symptomatic radiation-induced prostatitis.","PeriodicalId":72157,"journal":{"name":"AME medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AME medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AMJ-20-189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Definitive radiation remains a mainstay of treatment for men who have been diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Acute and chronic genitourinary (GU) toxicity after definitive radiotherapy (RT) can cause significant morbidity for patients. Furthermore, pinpointing the prostate and related prostatitis as the source of symptoms is very difficult and often comes down to a process of elimination. The pathophysiology underlying this prostatitis represents an even more frustrating challenge and is also poorly understood. When it has been identified as the source, radiation-induced prostatitis can be considered a form of chronic, non-bacterial prostatitis based on the NIH classification system. In this classification, radiationinduced prostatitis is exceedingly challenging to manage, with therapy focused on the three “A”s of chronic prostatitis: Anti-inflammatories, Antibiotics, and Alpha-blockers. Unfortunately, approximately 50% of men will have symptoms refractory to medical therapy with limited effectiveness of alternative medical and invasive options. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been shown to be a minimally invasive, safe and clinically effective treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). While evidence for both the diagnosis and management of post-radiation prostatitis is significantly lacking, this review evaluates the novel role of PAE for the management of refractory, symptomatic radiation-induced prostatitis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺动脉栓塞在放射后前列腺炎治疗中的作用综述
确定性放射治疗仍然是诊断为局限性前列腺癌症(PCa)的男性的主要治疗方法。明确放疗(RT)后的急性和慢性泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性可导致患者显著的发病率。此外,将前列腺和相关前列腺炎确定为症状的来源是非常困难的,并且通常可以归结为一个消除过程。这种前列腺炎背后的病理生理学是一个更令人沮丧的挑战,人们对此也知之甚少。当它被确定为来源时,根据美国国立卫生研究院的分类系统,辐射诱发的前列腺炎可以被认为是一种慢性非细菌性前列腺炎。在这一分类中,放射性前列腺炎的治疗极具挑战性,治疗重点是慢性前列腺炎的三个“A”:抗炎药、抗生素和α受体阻滞剂。不幸的是,大约50%的男性会出现难以接受药物治疗的症状,而替代药物和侵入性选择的效果有限。前列腺动脉栓塞(PAE)已被证明是一种微创、安全和临床有效的治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)继发的下尿路症状(LUTS)的方法。虽然诊断和治疗放射后前列腺炎的证据明显缺乏,但本综述评估了PAE在治疗难治性、症状性放射诱导前列腺炎方面的新作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of bronchoscopy training and competency: a narrative review Evaluation & management of clinically significant hemoptysis—a clinical practice review Donation after circulatory death: a narrative review of current controversies, attitudes, and the evolving role of regional perfusion technology Airway stent associated respiratory tract infections Added value of endoscopic ultrasound to endobronchial ultrasound in non-small cell lung cancer staging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1