Logic Must Justify Its Own Beginning: It Must Become “Dia-logic”

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI:10.1080/10611967.2020.1863730
V. S. Bibler
{"title":"Logic Must Justify Its Own Beginning: It Must Become “Dia-logic”","authors":"V. S. Bibler","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2020.1863730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this section, Bibler discusses the minutia of logic, specifically the development and maturation of logic as well as the self-justification of logic. Bibler points out that, in the science of logic, there is a problem of beginning and its justification. This problem was rightly identified by Hegel, but Hegel’s logic falls short in regard to logical justification. The paradoxical self-justification is, in Bibler’s view, the weak point of Hegel’s system and is subsequently also what we find in Marx’s Capital. What we need is a logic that can justify itself, a real logic, and not just Hegel’s “semi-logic.” Only this (real) logic is able to explain the process of transition from the old theory to the new one—the process by which new theories are developed.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"58 1","pages":"387 - 395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611967.2020.1863730","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2020.1863730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this section, Bibler discusses the minutia of logic, specifically the development and maturation of logic as well as the self-justification of logic. Bibler points out that, in the science of logic, there is a problem of beginning and its justification. This problem was rightly identified by Hegel, but Hegel’s logic falls short in regard to logical justification. The paradoxical self-justification is, in Bibler’s view, the weak point of Hegel’s system and is subsequently also what we find in Marx’s Capital. What we need is a logic that can justify itself, a real logic, and not just Hegel’s “semi-logic.” Only this (real) logic is able to explain the process of transition from the old theory to the new one—the process by which new theories are developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逻辑必须证明它自己的开端:它必须成为“辩证逻辑”
在这一节中,比布勒讨论了逻辑的细节,特别是逻辑的发展和成熟,以及逻辑的自我辩护。比伯勒指出,在逻辑科学中,有一个开端及其正当性的问题。黑格尔正确地指出了这个问题,但黑格尔的逻辑在逻辑论证方面存在不足。在比布勒看来,自相矛盾的自我辩护,是黑格尔体系的弱点,也是我们在马克思的《资本论》中发现的。我们需要的是一种能够自我证明的逻辑,一种真正的逻辑,而不仅仅是黑格尔的"半逻辑"只有这种(真实的)逻辑才能解释从旧理论到新理论的过渡过程,即新理论发展的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
期刊最新文献
Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1