Application of automated cone penetrometer for railway investigation using correlations with DCPI and deflection modulus

Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rcar.2022.08.005
Sang Yeob Kim , Won-Taek Hong , Jong-Sub Lee
{"title":"Application of automated cone penetrometer for railway investigation using correlations with DCPI and deflection modulus","authors":"Sang Yeob Kim ,&nbsp;Won-Taek Hong ,&nbsp;Jong-Sub Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.rcar.2022.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Portable in-situ devices have been used for characterizing low accessible field, such as the railway subgrade. In this study, the automated cone penetrometer (ACP) was designed for the application on the railway subgrade. ACP is composed of the cone tip, driving rod, and hydraulic hammer system. The hydraulic motor lifts and drops the 294.3 N hammer from a height of 200 mm such that the potential energy of 58.9 N m impacts the driving rod. The <em>N</em>-value (<em>N</em><sub>ACP</sub>) from the ACP test was compared with the dynamic cone penetration index (DCPI) from the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) test. The test results show that the <em>N</em><sub>ACP</sub> and DCPI profiles show opposite trend owing to the inverse concept of the unit. From the correlation of DCPI and <em>N</em><sub>ACP</sub>, the limitation of DCPI reveals owing the minimum manually measured value of 1 mm/blow. Additionally, the evaluation of the deflection modulus (<em>E</em><sub>FWD</sub>) using <em>N</em><sub>ACP</sub> is more efficient than that using DCPI. Based on the result of this study, we suggest that ACP can be used for strength and stiffness evaluation of railway subgrade rapidly and reliably.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097158322000052/pdfft?md5=5edf32620562fcae100923220f2ead78&pid=1-s2.0-S2097158322000052-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097158322000052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Portable in-situ devices have been used for characterizing low accessible field, such as the railway subgrade. In this study, the automated cone penetrometer (ACP) was designed for the application on the railway subgrade. ACP is composed of the cone tip, driving rod, and hydraulic hammer system. The hydraulic motor lifts and drops the 294.3 N hammer from a height of 200 mm such that the potential energy of 58.9 N m impacts the driving rod. The N-value (NACP) from the ACP test was compared with the dynamic cone penetration index (DCPI) from the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) test. The test results show that the NACP and DCPI profiles show opposite trend owing to the inverse concept of the unit. From the correlation of DCPI and NACP, the limitation of DCPI reveals owing the minimum manually measured value of 1 mm/blow. Additionally, the evaluation of the deflection modulus (EFWD) using NACP is more efficient than that using DCPI. Based on the result of this study, we suggest that ACP can be used for strength and stiffness evaluation of railway subgrade rapidly and reliably.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
利用与DCPI和挠度模量相关的自动锥贯仪在铁路勘察中的应用
便携式原位测定仪已被用于铁路路基等低可达场地的表征。本文设计了一种适用于铁路路基的自动测深仪(ACP)。ACP由锥尖、驱动杆和液压锤系统组成。液压马达从200mm高度抬升并落下294.3 N的锤头,使58.9 N m的势能冲击驱动杆。将ACP试验的n值(NACP)与动态锥入计(DCP)试验的动态锥入指数(DCPI)进行比较。试验结果表明,由于机组概念相反,NACP和DCPI曲线呈现相反的趋势。从DCPI与NACP的相关性来看,DCPI的局限性在于其最小人工测量值为1 mm/blow。此外,NACP对挠曲模量(EFWD)的评估比DCPI更有效。研究结果表明,ACP法可以快速、可靠地用于铁路路基的强度和刚度评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1