Estimation of stand density using aerial LiDAR information: Integrating the area-based-approach and individual-tree-detection methods in plantations of Pinus radiata

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 BOSQUE Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.4067/s0717-92002023000200377
Marcelo López, Simón Sandoval
{"title":"Estimation of stand density using aerial LiDAR information: Integrating the area-based-approach and individual-tree-detection methods in plantations of Pinus radiata","authors":"Marcelo López, Simón Sandoval","doi":"10.4067/s0717-92002023000200377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY A mixed approach was applied using aerial LiDAR information to estimate the stand density in a Pinus radiata plantation. The methods used individual tree detection (ITD) information to improve stand density estimates from the approach-based area (ABA) method. Method 1, which corresponds to the traditional ABA estimation in a linear mode, obtained a RMSE = 23.6 % and a AIC = 840.9, where the LiDAR metrics used were in the 95 % percentile and the ratio between first returns over 1.3 m (COV). Method 2, which corresponds to an Individual Tree Detection (ITD) algorithm configured with a search window of 3 meters and a height defined by the 50th percentile, resulted in a RMSE = 49%. The mixed method 3 used the number of trees detected in method 2 as an additional metric in the ABA method, generating RMSE = 20.9 % and a AIC = 822.1. Method 4 was defined as mixed with error, which incorporated the number of trees estimated using the ITD method as another predictor variable, generating a RMSE = 21.3 % and a AIC = 835.2. The method with the best performance was 3, reducing 2.7 percentage points with respect to the RMSE of method 1 (traditional ABA). The integration of the ABA and ITD methods improved estimations of stand density, and also achieved better representation of the spatial variability of the number of trees at complete stand level","PeriodicalId":55338,"journal":{"name":"BOSQUE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BOSQUE","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-92002023000200377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARY A mixed approach was applied using aerial LiDAR information to estimate the stand density in a Pinus radiata plantation. The methods used individual tree detection (ITD) information to improve stand density estimates from the approach-based area (ABA) method. Method 1, which corresponds to the traditional ABA estimation in a linear mode, obtained a RMSE = 23.6 % and a AIC = 840.9, where the LiDAR metrics used were in the 95 % percentile and the ratio between first returns over 1.3 m (COV). Method 2, which corresponds to an Individual Tree Detection (ITD) algorithm configured with a search window of 3 meters and a height defined by the 50th percentile, resulted in a RMSE = 49%. The mixed method 3 used the number of trees detected in method 2 as an additional metric in the ABA method, generating RMSE = 20.9 % and a AIC = 822.1. Method 4 was defined as mixed with error, which incorporated the number of trees estimated using the ITD method as another predictor variable, generating a RMSE = 21.3 % and a AIC = 835.2. The method with the best performance was 3, reducing 2.7 percentage points with respect to the RMSE of method 1 (traditional ABA). The integration of the ABA and ITD methods improved estimations of stand density, and also achieved better representation of the spatial variability of the number of trees at complete stand level
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用航空激光雷达信息估算林分密度:辐射松人工林中基于面积的方法和单株检测方法的集成
利用航空激光雷达信息,采用混合方法估算辐射松人工林林分密度。该方法利用单树检测(ITD)信息来改进基于方法的面积(ABA)法估算的林分密度。方法1与传统的线性模式ABA估计相对应,得到RMSE = 23.6%, AIC = 840.9,其中使用的LiDAR指标在95%百分位数内,首次收益超过1.3 m (COV)之间的比率。方法2对应于单个树检测(Individual Tree Detection, ITD)算法,其搜索窗口为3米,高度为第50百分位,RMSE = 49%。混合方法3使用方法2中检测到的树数作为ABA方法的附加度量,生成RMSE = 20.9%, AIC = 822.1。方法4定义为混合误差,将使用ITD方法估计的树数作为另一个预测变量,得到RMSE = 21.3%, AIC = 835.2。效果最好的方法为3,相对于方法1(传统ABA)的RMSE降低2.7个百分点。ABA和ITD方法的结合改进了林分密度的估计,也更好地反映了完整林分水平上乔木数量的空间变异性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BOSQUE
BOSQUE Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BOSQUE publishes original works in the field of management and production of forestry resources, wood science and technology, silviculture, forestry ecology, natural resources conservation, and rural development associated with forest ecosystems. Contributions may be articles, rewiews, notes or opinions, Either in Spanish or English.
期刊最新文献
Presencia de la comadrejita trompuda (Rhyncholestes raphanurus) en la Cordillera de la Costa Valdiviana, Chile Diversidad, estructura y salud del arbolado en áreas verdes de la ciudad de Texcoco, México Disponibilidad a pagar en escenarios alternativos de mejora en el Parque Nacional El Chico, Hidalgo, México Aproximación paleobiogeográfica a la Sierra del Tablón (Serranía de Ronda, España) a partir del análisis pedoantracológico Crecimiento y desarrollo fotosintético de Swietenia mahagoni en sustratos inoculados con micorrizas arbusculares
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1