A survey on air pollutant PM2.5 prediction using random forest model

IF 1.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.34172/ehem.2023.18
S. Babu, B. Thomas
{"title":"A survey on air pollutant PM2.5 prediction using random forest model","authors":"S. Babu, B. Thomas","doi":"10.34172/ehem.2023.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the most critical contributors to air pollution is particulate matter (PM2.5) that its acute or chronic exposure causes serious health effects to human. Accurate forecasting of PM2.5 concentration is essential for air pollution control and prevention of health complications. A survey of the available scientific literature on random forest model for PM2.5 prediction is presented here. Methods: The scientific literature is extracted from Science Direct database based on a set of specified search criteria. The input features, data length, and evaluation parameters used in PM2.5 prediction were analyzed in this study. Results: The study shows that majority of the publications are aimed at the daily prediction of outdoor PM2.5. Most publications base their PM2.5 prediction on features aerosol optical depth (AOD) and boundary layer height (BLH). PM10 and NO2 are the main air pollutants employed in the PM2.5 estimation. Majority studies utilized input data lengths covering more than one year, and the effectiveness of prediction models are unaffected by the length of investigation. The coefficient of determination, R2 , is the primary evaluation parameter used in all publications. The majority of research study indicated R2 values greater than 0.85, demonstrating the reasonable dependability and efficiency of random forest regression-based PM2.5 prediction models. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that the publications use a variety of meteorological and geological features for PM2.5 estimation, depending on the context of the research as well as data accessibility. The findings demonstrate that it is hard to pinpoint the optimal model in any particular way.","PeriodicalId":51877,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ehem.2023.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: One of the most critical contributors to air pollution is particulate matter (PM2.5) that its acute or chronic exposure causes serious health effects to human. Accurate forecasting of PM2.5 concentration is essential for air pollution control and prevention of health complications. A survey of the available scientific literature on random forest model for PM2.5 prediction is presented here. Methods: The scientific literature is extracted from Science Direct database based on a set of specified search criteria. The input features, data length, and evaluation parameters used in PM2.5 prediction were analyzed in this study. Results: The study shows that majority of the publications are aimed at the daily prediction of outdoor PM2.5. Most publications base their PM2.5 prediction on features aerosol optical depth (AOD) and boundary layer height (BLH). PM10 and NO2 are the main air pollutants employed in the PM2.5 estimation. Majority studies utilized input data lengths covering more than one year, and the effectiveness of prediction models are unaffected by the length of investigation. The coefficient of determination, R2 , is the primary evaluation parameter used in all publications. The majority of research study indicated R2 values greater than 0.85, demonstrating the reasonable dependability and efficiency of random forest regression-based PM2.5 prediction models. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that the publications use a variety of meteorological and geological features for PM2.5 estimation, depending on the context of the research as well as data accessibility. The findings demonstrate that it is hard to pinpoint the optimal model in any particular way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于随机森林模型的大气污染物PM2.5预测研究
背景:造成空气污染的最关键因素之一是颗粒物(PM2.5),其急性或慢性暴露会对人类健康造成严重影响。准确预测PM2.5浓度对于控制空气污染和预防健康并发症至关重要。本文对用于PM2.5预测的随机森林模型的现有科学文献进行了调查。方法:根据一组指定的搜索标准,从Science Direct数据库中提取科学文献。本研究分析了PM2.5预测中使用的输入特征、数据长度和评估参数。结果:研究表明,大多数出版物都是针对户外PM2.5的日常预测。大多数出版物的PM2.5预测是基于气溶胶光学深度(AOD)和边界层高度(BLH)的特征。PM10和NO2是PM2.5估算中使用的主要空气污染物。大多数研究使用的输入数据长度超过一年,预测模型的有效性不受调查长度的影响。决定系数R2是所有出版物中使用的主要评估参数。大多数研究表明R2值大于0.85,证明了基于随机森林回归的PM2.5预测模型的合理可靠性和有效性。结论:研究表明,根据研究背景和数据可及性,出版物使用了各种气象和地质特征来估计PM2.5。研究结果表明,很难以任何特定的方式精确定位最优模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
37.50%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Two phases of online food delivery app users’ behavior in Greater Jakarta during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceptions of food safety and hygiene Feasibility of natural wastewater treatment systems and life cycle assessment (LCA) for aquatic systems Modeling the concentration of suspended particles by fuzzy inference system (FIS) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) techniques: A case study in the metro stations Plant inoculation with Piriformospora indica fungus and additive effects of organic and inorganic Zn fertilize on decreasing the Cd concentration of the plants cultivated in the Cd-polluted soil Quantitative assessment of health, safety, and environment (HSE) resilience based on the Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in municipal solid waste management system: A case study in Tehran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1