Contraceptive Method Attributes and Married Women's Intention to Use the Pill or the Injectable in Rural Bangladesh.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1363/44e7118
F. Huda, J. Casterline, F. Ahmmed, K. Machiyama, Hassan Rushekh Mahmood, Anisuddin Ahmed, J. Cleland
{"title":"Contraceptive Method Attributes and Married Women's Intention to Use the Pill or the Injectable in Rural Bangladesh.","authors":"F. Huda, J. Casterline, F. Ahmmed, K. Machiyama, Hassan Rushekh Mahmood, Anisuddin Ahmed, J. Cleland","doi":"10.1363/44e7118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nThe factors underlying contraceptive method choice are poorly understood in many countries, including Bangladesh. It is important to understand how Bangladeshi women's perceptions of a method's attributes are associated with their intention to use that method.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData on 2,605 married women aged 15-39 living in rural Matlab were taken from a baseline survey conducted in 2016. Conditional logit analysis was used to examine associations between 12 method attributes and intention to use the pill or the injectable among the 583 fecund women not currently using a method. Method attributes included those relating to ease of obtainment and use, efficacy, health effects, husband's approval, the experiences of the respondent and the experiences of women in the respondent's social network.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWomen tended to perceive the pill more positively than the injectable. For example, greater proportions of women reported believing that the pill is easy to use (90% vs. 72%) and does not cause serious health problems (75% vs. 38%). The likelihood that a woman intended to use a method was positively associated with her perception that it is easy to use (odds ratio, 2.9) and does not cause serious health problems (1.7) or affect long-term fertility (2.9). Satisfied past users of a method were more likely than never users to report intending to use the method (5.2). Intention to use the pill rather than the injectable was positively associated with education (2.0-3.6) and having a migrant husband (1.7).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nNegative beliefs not supported by evidence, particularly about the injectable, are associated with women's intention to use a contraceptive method. The results may be useful in improving contraceptive care, counseling and training.","PeriodicalId":46940,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/44e7118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

CONTEXT The factors underlying contraceptive method choice are poorly understood in many countries, including Bangladesh. It is important to understand how Bangladeshi women's perceptions of a method's attributes are associated with their intention to use that method. METHODS Data on 2,605 married women aged 15-39 living in rural Matlab were taken from a baseline survey conducted in 2016. Conditional logit analysis was used to examine associations between 12 method attributes and intention to use the pill or the injectable among the 583 fecund women not currently using a method. Method attributes included those relating to ease of obtainment and use, efficacy, health effects, husband's approval, the experiences of the respondent and the experiences of women in the respondent's social network. RESULTS Women tended to perceive the pill more positively than the injectable. For example, greater proportions of women reported believing that the pill is easy to use (90% vs. 72%) and does not cause serious health problems (75% vs. 38%). The likelihood that a woman intended to use a method was positively associated with her perception that it is easy to use (odds ratio, 2.9) and does not cause serious health problems (1.7) or affect long-term fertility (2.9). Satisfied past users of a method were more likely than never users to report intending to use the method (5.2). Intention to use the pill rather than the injectable was positively associated with education (2.0-3.6) and having a migrant husband (1.7). CONCLUSIONS Negative beliefs not supported by evidence, particularly about the injectable, are associated with women's intention to use a contraceptive method. The results may be useful in improving contraceptive care, counseling and training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国农村地区已婚妇女使用避孕药或注射剂的避孕方法属性和意愿。
在包括孟加拉国在内的许多国家,人们对避孕方法选择背后的因素知之甚少。重要的是要了解孟加拉国妇女对一种方法属性的看法如何与她们使用该方法的意图相关联。方法选取2016年开展的基线调查中居住在Matlab农村地区的2605名15-39岁已婚女性的数据。使用条件logit分析来检查583名目前未使用某种方法的育龄妇女中12种方法属性与使用避孕药或注射剂的意图之间的关联。方法属性包括与获取和使用的便利性、疗效、健康影响、丈夫的认可、应答者的经历以及应答者社会网络中妇女的经历有关的属性。结果女性对口服避孕药的认知比注射剂更积极。例如,更大比例的妇女报告认为避孕药易于使用(90%对72%),不会造成严重的健康问题(75%对38%)。妇女打算使用某种方法的可能性与她认为该方法易于使用(比值比,2.9)、不会造成严重健康问题(比值比,1.7)或影响长期生育能力(比值比,2.9)呈正相关。满意的某一方法的过去使用者比从未使用者更有可能报告打算使用该方法(5.2)。使用避孕药而非注射剂的意愿与教育程度(2.0-3.6)和有一个流动丈夫(1.7)呈正相关。结论:缺乏证据支持的消极信念,特别是关于注射的,与妇女使用避孕方法的意图有关。研究结果可能有助于改善避孕护理、咨询和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's Perspectives on Contraceptive-Induced Amenorrhea in Burkina Faso and Uganda. Provider and Women Characteristics as Risk Factors for Postpartum Copper IUD Expulsion and Discontinuation in Nepal. Assessing Readiness to Provide Comprehensive Abortion Care in the Democratic Republic of the Congo After Passage of the Maputo Protocol. An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan. Chilean Medical and Midwifery Faculty's Views on Conscientious Objection for Abortion Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1