DISADVANTAGES OF THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION OF THE SEARCH IN LIGHT OF PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

M. I. Zhirova, S. Kondratiuk
{"title":"DISADVANTAGES OF THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION OF THE SEARCH IN LIGHT OF PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","authors":"M. I. Zhirova, S. Kondratiuk","doi":"10.34671/sch.hbr.2019.0304.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". A search is a complex investigative action in both the procedural and psychological aspects of its production. This is due to both a large number of procedural requirements for its implementation, and a lot of moral issues related to the forced seizure of objects and documents, restrictions of human rights and freedoms. The article is devoted to a number of questions of the search, which require more precise regulation in the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure in the light of the protection of human rights and freedoms. Based on the provisions of international acts and the Constitution of the Russian Federation it is shown that the improvement of the procedural order of the search is today an urgent need so as to law enforcement practice should fully meet the high standards of protection of human rights and freedoms. In particular, it is proposed to specify in the law the definition of the purposes and grounds for the search. Legislative fuzzy definition of these categories entails the adoption of arbitrary, unreasonable decisions about the search. The authors believe that the actual basis for the search can only be information obtained by procedural means. In order to preserve information that is a secret to the privacy of the participants of the search it is necessary to introduce a restriction on the circle of persons who may be involved as witnesses and also determine the limits of fixing the circumstances of the private life of citizens in respect of whom a search is being conducted in the search report or other materials of the criminal case. The article also proposes an author’s solution to the question of the possibility of a search of a house in the absence of persons living in it. criminal proceedings, protection of human rights and freedoms, investigative actions, search, search pur-pose, grounds for the search, seizure of objects and documents, coercion in criminal proceedings, procedural regulation.","PeriodicalId":34335,"journal":{"name":"Khumanitarni Balkanski izsledvaniia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khumanitarni Balkanski izsledvaniia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34671/sch.hbr.2019.0304.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. A search is a complex investigative action in both the procedural and psychological aspects of its production. This is due to both a large number of procedural requirements for its implementation, and a lot of moral issues related to the forced seizure of objects and documents, restrictions of human rights and freedoms. The article is devoted to a number of questions of the search, which require more precise regulation in the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure in the light of the protection of human rights and freedoms. Based on the provisions of international acts and the Constitution of the Russian Federation it is shown that the improvement of the procedural order of the search is today an urgent need so as to law enforcement practice should fully meet the high standards of protection of human rights and freedoms. In particular, it is proposed to specify in the law the definition of the purposes and grounds for the search. Legislative fuzzy definition of these categories entails the adoption of arbitrary, unreasonable decisions about the search. The authors believe that the actual basis for the search can only be information obtained by procedural means. In order to preserve information that is a secret to the privacy of the participants of the search it is necessary to introduce a restriction on the circle of persons who may be involved as witnesses and also determine the limits of fixing the circumstances of the private life of citizens in respect of whom a search is being conducted in the search report or other materials of the criminal case. The article also proposes an author’s solution to the question of the possibility of a search of a house in the absence of persons living in it. criminal proceedings, protection of human rights and freedoms, investigative actions, search, search pur-pose, grounds for the search, seizure of objects and documents, coercion in criminal proceedings, procedural regulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从保护人权与自由的角度看搜查程序规制的弊端
搜查是一项复杂的调查行动,在程序和心理方面都是如此。这是由于执行该法案的大量程序要求,以及与强制扣押物品和文件、限制人权和自由有关的许多道德问题。这篇文章专门讨论了搜查的一些问题,这些问题需要在《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》中从保护人权和自由的角度进行更精确的规定。根据国际法和《俄罗斯联邦宪法》的规定,目前迫切需要改进搜查程序秩序,以便执法实践完全符合保护人权和自由的高标准。特别是,建议在法律中明确搜查目的和理由的定义。对这些类别的立法模糊定义意味着对搜查采取武断、不合理的决定。提交人认为,搜查的实际依据只能是通过程序手段获得的信息。为了保护对搜查参与者隐私保密的信息,有必要对可能作为证人参与的人员圈子进行限制,并确定在搜查报告或刑事案件的其他材料中确定对正在进行搜查的公民的私生活情况的限制。该条还提出了提交人对在无人居住的情况下搜查房屋的可能性问题的解决办法:刑事诉讼、保护人权和自由、调查行动、搜查、搜查目的、搜查理由、扣押物品和文件、刑事诉讼中的胁迫、程序规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN THE CONDITIONS OF KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY AND INDUSTRY 4.0 - POTENTIAL AND PERSPECTIVES MEDICAL ASPECTS OF SUPPORTING CHILDREN WITH AUTIC SPECTRUM DISORDERS NAKHCHIVAN CITY IS BEGINNING OF BEGINNING ABOUT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELIGION AND ART ERP SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AS AN IMPORTANT STAGE OF THE COMPANY'S DEVELOPMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1