A Good Crisis: Emergencies and the Reframing of American Higher Education, 1944–1965

Q2 Social Sciences Peabody Journal of Education Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI:10.1080/0161956x.2023.2216087
Ethan W. Ris
{"title":"A Good Crisis: Emergencies and the Reframing of American Higher Education, 1944–1965","authors":"Ethan W. Ris","doi":"10.1080/0161956x.2023.2216087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purported “Golden Age” of American higher education, typically associated with the two decades following World War II, was marked by increasingly generous federal support of the nation’s postsecondary institutions and their students. Unlike analyses that attribute this largesse to factors like geopolitics (i.e., a response to the Cold War) or demographics (i.e., expansion to accommodate the Baby Boom generation), this article argues that a deliberate strategy rooted in rhetoric enabled “higher education partisans” to successfully push generous higher education policy in Washington, DC. Specifically, the language of crisis and emergency enabled these advocates to frame college-going as a tool that could solve social and economic problems, defend the nation and its values, and chip away at prejudice and inequality. Their success is evident in a “policy cascade” initiated by the 1944 GI Bill and reaching its apex with the 1965 Higher Education Act. This article relies on new archival research and document analysis to examine the trajectories of six key pieces of federal policymaking, which together constituted “a sheep in wolf’s clothing” by couching funding for colleges and universities as a response to urgent, even existential, crises.","PeriodicalId":39777,"journal":{"name":"Peabody Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peabody Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2023.2216087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purported “Golden Age” of American higher education, typically associated with the two decades following World War II, was marked by increasingly generous federal support of the nation’s postsecondary institutions and their students. Unlike analyses that attribute this largesse to factors like geopolitics (i.e., a response to the Cold War) or demographics (i.e., expansion to accommodate the Baby Boom generation), this article argues that a deliberate strategy rooted in rhetoric enabled “higher education partisans” to successfully push generous higher education policy in Washington, DC. Specifically, the language of crisis and emergency enabled these advocates to frame college-going as a tool that could solve social and economic problems, defend the nation and its values, and chip away at prejudice and inequality. Their success is evident in a “policy cascade” initiated by the 1944 GI Bill and reaching its apex with the 1965 Higher Education Act. This article relies on new archival research and document analysis to examine the trajectories of six key pieces of federal policymaking, which together constituted “a sheep in wolf’s clothing” by couching funding for colleges and universities as a response to urgent, even existential, crises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一场好的危机:紧急情况与美国高等教育的重构,1944-1965
摘要所谓的美国高等教育“黄金时代”,通常与二战后的二十年联系在一起,其标志是联邦政府对美国高等教育机构及其学生越来越慷慨的支持。与将这种慷慨归因于地缘政治(即对冷战的回应)或人口统计(即为适应婴儿潮一代而进行的扩张)等因素的分析不同,本文认为,植根于言论的深思熟虑的策略使“高等教育党派”能够成功地在华盛顿特区推行慷慨的高等教育政策。具体而言,危机和紧急情况的语言使这些倡导者能够将上大学视为一种工具,可以解决社会和经济问题,捍卫国家及其价值观,消除偏见和不平等。他们的成功体现在1944年《退伍军人法案》发起的“政策级联”中,并在1965年《高等教育法》中达到顶峰。这篇文章依靠新的档案研究和文件分析来研究联邦政策制定的六个关键部分的轨迹,这些部分共同构成了“披着狼衣服的绵羊”,为学院和大学提供资金,以应对紧急甚至存在的危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Peabody Journal of Education
Peabody Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Peabody Journal of Education (PJE) publishes quarterly symposia in the broad area of education, including but not limited to topics related to formal institutions serving students in early childhood, pre-school, primary, elementary, intermediate, secondary, post-secondary, and tertiary education. The scope of the journal includes special kinds of educational institutions, such as those providing vocational training or the schooling for students with disabilities. PJE also welcomes manuscript submissions that concentrate on informal education dynamics, those outside the immediate framework of institutions, and education matters that are important to nations outside the United States.
期刊最新文献
Should Religious Schools Be Publicly Funded? Issues of Religion, Discrimination, and Equity New York City Catholic Schools Operating in the Public Space in a Post- Makin World Education Research-Practice Partnerships: Impacts and Dynamics Broadening our Understanding of how Research-Practice Partnerships Support Educational Improvement and Equitable Transformation Embedding Racialized Selves into the Creation of Research-Practice Partnerships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1