Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy in Detecting Metastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer

Jeeyeon Lee, H. Park, W. Kim, Chan Sub Park, M. Jeong, J. Jung
{"title":"Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy in Detecting Metastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer","authors":"Jeeyeon Lee, H. Park, W. Kim, Chan Sub Park, M. Jeong, J. Jung","doi":"10.46268/jsu.2020.7.2.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Axillary lymph node status is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Axillary lymph nodes can be evaluated using fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or core needle biopsy (CNB) before surgery. This study compared the accuracy and false-negative rates between FNAC and CNB in patients with breast cancer who either did or did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: The clinicopathological factors of the patients were analyzed retrospectively, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates, and accuracy of FNAC (n = 27) and CNB (n = 23) were compared. Results: Regardless of whether or not NAC was performed, the CNB evaluation of the metastatic axillary lymph nodes had a 100.0% sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy, except for one case with an inadequate sample. In the FNAC group, the false-negative rate was higher in patients with breast cancer who received NAC before evaluating the lymph nodes (9.1% vs. 7.7%). Moreover, ultrasound imaging was the most sensitive imaging modality that can detect the suspicious axillary lymph node. Conclusion: CNB was more effective in evaluating the axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer than FNAC and was performed without major complications.","PeriodicalId":33937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46268/jsu.2020.7.2.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Axillary lymph node status is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Axillary lymph nodes can be evaluated using fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or core needle biopsy (CNB) before surgery. This study compared the accuracy and false-negative rates between FNAC and CNB in patients with breast cancer who either did or did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: The clinicopathological factors of the patients were analyzed retrospectively, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates, and accuracy of FNAC (n = 27) and CNB (n = 23) were compared. Results: Regardless of whether or not NAC was performed, the CNB evaluation of the metastatic axillary lymph nodes had a 100.0% sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy, except for one case with an inadequate sample. In the FNAC group, the false-negative rate was higher in patients with breast cancer who received NAC before evaluating the lymph nodes (9.1% vs. 7.7%). Moreover, ultrasound imaging was the most sensitive imaging modality that can detect the suspicious axillary lymph node. Conclusion: CNB was more effective in evaluating the axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer than FNAC and was performed without major complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下芯针活检检测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的疗效
目的:腋窝淋巴结状态是乳腺癌预后的重要因素。腋窝淋巴结可以在手术前使用细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)或核心针活检(CNB)进行评估。本研究比较了在接受或未接受新辅助化疗(NAC)的乳腺癌患者中,FNAC和CNB的准确性和假阴性率。方法:回顾性分析患者的临床病理因素,比较FNAC (n = 27)和CNB (n = 23)的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、假阳性率、假阴性率及准确率。结果:无论是否行NAC, CNB评估转移性腋窝淋巴结的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和准确性均为100.0%,除了一例样本不足。在FNAC组中,在评估淋巴结前接受NAC的乳腺癌患者的假阴性率更高(9.1%比7.7%)。超声是发现可疑腋窝淋巴结最灵敏的影像学方式。结论:CNB对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结的评价比FNAC更有效,且无重大并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Leg Ulcers Accompanied by Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Lymphedema Caused by IgG4-Related Disease Ultrasound Risk Stratification System of Thyroid Nodule Effects of Ultrasound Targeted Destruction of Echogenic Nanobubbles Containing Doxorubicin in Rat Liver Correlation of Resistive Index Values Using Spectral Doppler Ultrasound with Histopathological Results in Breast Tumors Diagnostic Utility of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1