Current knowledge for the microbiological diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei infection

Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/21678707.2020.1791700
S. Edouard, L. Luciani, J. Lagier, D. Raoult
{"title":"Current knowledge for the microbiological diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei infection","authors":"S. Edouard, L. Luciani, J. Lagier, D. Raoult","doi":"10.1080/21678707.2020.1791700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Whipple's disease is a rare clinical entity that is usually fatal if left untreated.Tropheryma whippleiwas first cultured 20 years ago, and has led to the development of diagnostic tools that have greatly improved knowledge of the disease. T. whipplei is actually more common than initially described with the description of common asymptomatic carriage. Areas covered We reviewed current knowledge of microbiological diagnosis and summarized the diagnostic strategy ofT. whipplei infection. Articles were selected from Medline and Google scholar using the keywords ‘Tropheryma whipplei’ OR ‘Whipple’s disease’ AND ‘diagnosis’. Expert opinion Definitive diagnosis of Whipple’s disease is challenging and continues to be based on immunohistochemical analysis or PAS staining combined with positive qPCR on duodenal biopsy. Initially, screening forT. whipplei was recommended on stool and saliva which are associated with a high positive predictive value of Whipple’s disease. However, given the presence of a large number of asymptomatic carriers, the specificity of a positive qPCR on these samples is likely to have decreased and their interests should be reevaluated. The development of new noninvasive tests may be useful for the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease and qPCR performed on urine could be a promising alternative.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21678707.2020.1791700","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2020.1791700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Whipple's disease is a rare clinical entity that is usually fatal if left untreated.Tropheryma whippleiwas first cultured 20 years ago, and has led to the development of diagnostic tools that have greatly improved knowledge of the disease. T. whipplei is actually more common than initially described with the description of common asymptomatic carriage. Areas covered We reviewed current knowledge of microbiological diagnosis and summarized the diagnostic strategy ofT. whipplei infection. Articles were selected from Medline and Google scholar using the keywords ‘Tropheryma whipplei’ OR ‘Whipple’s disease’ AND ‘diagnosis’. Expert opinion Definitive diagnosis of Whipple’s disease is challenging and continues to be based on immunohistochemical analysis or PAS staining combined with positive qPCR on duodenal biopsy. Initially, screening forT. whipplei was recommended on stool and saliva which are associated with a high positive predictive value of Whipple’s disease. However, given the presence of a large number of asymptomatic carriers, the specificity of a positive qPCR on these samples is likely to have decreased and their interests should be reevaluated. The development of new noninvasive tests may be useful for the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease and qPCR performed on urine could be a promising alternative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
绒毛膜肥大细胞感染微生物学诊断的最新知识
摘要简介惠普尔病是一种罕见的临床疾病,如果不及时治疗,通常会致命。Tropheryma whipplei于20年前首次被培养,并导致了诊断工具的开发,极大地提高了对该疾病的认识。实际上,T.whipplei比最初描述的常见无症状携带更常见。涵盖的领域我们回顾了微生物诊断的最新知识,并总结了T的诊断策略。whipplei感染。文章选自Medline和谷歌学者,关键词为“Tropheryma whipplei”或“Whipple病”和“诊断”。专家意见Whipple病的最终诊断具有挑战性,并且仍然基于免疫组织化学分析或PAS染色结合十二指肠活检的阳性qPCR。最初,筛选T。建议在粪便和唾液中使用whipplei,这与Whipple病的高阳性预测值有关。然而,鉴于存在大量无症状携带者,qPCR阳性对这些样本的特异性可能已经降低,应该重新评估他们的兴趣。新的非侵入性检测方法的开发可能有助于诊断Whipple病,对尿液进行qPCR可能是一种很有前途的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1