Qualitative Evaluation of the Science Curriculum Applied in Science and Art Centers (SACs) for Gifted Students in Turkey Within the Framework of the CIPP Approach

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Advanced Academics Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI:10.1177/1932202X221119535
Nurettin Can Bodur, Cengiz Tuysuz, I. Ugulu
{"title":"Qualitative Evaluation of the Science Curriculum Applied in Science and Art Centers (SACs) for Gifted Students in Turkey Within the Framework of the CIPP Approach","authors":"Nurettin Can Bodur, Cengiz Tuysuz, I. Ugulu","doi":"10.1177/1932202X221119535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted using a qualitative approach as it aimed to evaluate the Science and Art Center Science Curriculum (SACSC), which was updated in 2020, within the framework of the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) approach by taking the opinions of science teachers working in Science and Art Centers (SACs) in Turkey. The data were collected according to the qualitative data collection method and a structured interview form was used as a data collection tool. The findings showed that science teachers working in SACs have generally negative views on SACSC based on the context dimension of the CIPP Model, while their views are generally positive based on input, process, and product dimensions. Based on the results of the research, it is recommended to conduct other comparative studies between the SACSC and similar curricula in other countries in order to reveal the relationship between the program components and the needs of children and society.","PeriodicalId":46535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Academics","volume":"33 1","pages":"604 - 635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Academics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221119535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted using a qualitative approach as it aimed to evaluate the Science and Art Center Science Curriculum (SACSC), which was updated in 2020, within the framework of the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) approach by taking the opinions of science teachers working in Science and Art Centers (SACs) in Turkey. The data were collected according to the qualitative data collection method and a structured interview form was used as a data collection tool. The findings showed that science teachers working in SACs have generally negative views on SACSC based on the context dimension of the CIPP Model, while their views are generally positive based on input, process, and product dimensions. Based on the results of the research, it is recommended to conduct other comparative studies between the SACSC and similar curricula in other countries in order to reveal the relationship between the program components and the needs of children and society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CIPP方法框架下土耳其科学与艺术中心(SAC)天才学生科学课程应用的定性评估
本研究采用定性方法进行,旨在评估科学和艺术中心科学课程(SACSC),该课程于2020年更新,在背景、输入、过程和产品(CIPP)方法的框架内,通过听取在土耳其科学和艺术中心(SACs)工作的科学教师的意见。数据收集采用定性数据收集方法,数据收集工具采用结构化访谈表格。研究发现,基于CIPP模型的情境维度,科学教师对SACSC的评价总体为负面,而基于输入、过程和产品维度,科学教师对SACSC的评价总体为正面。在研究结果的基础上,建议对SACSC与其他国家类似课程进行其他比较研究,以揭示方案组成部分与儿童和社会需求之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Academics
Journal of Advanced Academics EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Editorial Word: Relationships Course Correction: Navigating Equity in Ninth-Grade Advanced Placement Navigating AP Research: Unveiling Applied Technology High School Students’ Perspectives, Gains, and Challenges Enhancing the Professional Skills of Future Biologists Through Laboratory Training Call for Proposals: Special Issue on AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1