Linguistic Influence on Russian and American Ethnobiological Categorization

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Ethnobiology Letters Pub Date : 2019-05-30 DOI:10.14237/EBL.10.1.2019.1497
Justin M. Nolan, Aina Zaresheva, Michael C. Robbins
{"title":"Linguistic Influence on Russian and American Ethnobiological Categorization","authors":"Justin M. Nolan, Aina Zaresheva, Michael C. Robbins","doi":"10.14237/EBL.10.1.2019.1497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Russian language, nouns are classified by gender and animacy, whereas in English, nouns are not. Using triad-sorts of names for biological and non-biological taxa, a comparison of results provided by native speakers of both languages reveals that cognitive categorizations of animate and inanimate nomenclatural forms differ significantly between speakers of Russian and American English. Speakers of American English appear to categorize names for living nouns more by phenotype than do Russians, who in turn appear to classify nouns more frequently on the basis of linguistic features such as gender. These results are believed to be pertinent to the elicitation and construction of folk ethnobiology taxonomies.","PeriodicalId":43787,"journal":{"name":"Ethnobiology Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnobiology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14237/EBL.10.1.2019.1497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Russian language, nouns are classified by gender and animacy, whereas in English, nouns are not. Using triad-sorts of names for biological and non-biological taxa, a comparison of results provided by native speakers of both languages reveals that cognitive categorizations of animate and inanimate nomenclatural forms differ significantly between speakers of Russian and American English. Speakers of American English appear to categorize names for living nouns more by phenotype than do Russians, who in turn appear to classify nouns more frequently on the basis of linguistic features such as gender. These results are believed to be pertinent to the elicitation and construction of folk ethnobiology taxonomies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言对俄罗斯和美国民族生物学分类的影响
在俄语中,名词是按性别和动物性来分类的,而在英语中,名词则不是这样。使用三种类型的生物和非生物分类群的名称,比较两种语言的母语人士提供的结果表明,有生命和无生命的命名形式的认知分类在俄罗斯和美国英语之间存在显著差异。说美式英语的人似乎比俄罗斯人更倾向于用表现型来给活名词分类,而俄罗斯人则更倾向于用性别等语言特征来给名词分类。这些结果被认为与民间民族生物学分类的启发和构建有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnobiology Letters
Ethnobiology Letters ANTHROPOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enduring Legacies of Agriculture: Long-term Vegetation Impacts of Ancestral Menominee Agriculture, Wisconsin, USA Directions In Brazilian Ethnobiology In Search of the Ancient Maya Foods. A Paleoethnobotany Study From a Non-elite Context in Sihó, Yucatán Perceptions of the Titicaca Grebe (Rollandia microptera) in a Peruvian Aymara Fishing Village Prescribed Fire Use Among Black Landowners in the Red Hills Region, USA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1