{"title":"Tomás Moro ante la “king’s great matter”","authors":"Hernán Corral Talciani","doi":"10.4067/s0716-54552020000100263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen Una disputa juridico-canonica conmovio la Europa del siglo XVI y tuvo repercusiones duraderas tanto politicas como eclesiasticas, sobre todo porque concurrio con la llamada reforma protestante y la separacion de la iglesia anglicana de Roma. Aunque se habla de divorcio, en realidad se trato de una causa de nulidad matrimonial, sostenida por Enrique VIII en contra de la que habia sido su mujer por casi 20 anos, Catalina de Aragon, y que se basaba en que habia un impedimento indispensable contenido en la Biblia que prohibia casarse con la mujer del hermano. El rey trato que el mejor abogado de su tiempo y celebre humanista, Tomas Moro, apoyara su demanda. Moro se nego, pero mantuvo silencio sobre sus razones. En este trabajo se intenta, por los indicios de sus cartas y primeras biografias, determinar cual fue su pensamiento al respecto y la seriedad que le asigno al asunto, al punto de preferir la muerte antes de declarar una opinion distinta a la que se habia formado en conciencia. EnglishAbstract A canonical-legal dispute shook 16th-century’s Europe and had lasting political and ecclesiastical repercussions, not least because it concurred with the so-called Protestant Reformation and the separation of the Anglican Church from the Roman Church. Although at the time, it was reffered as a divorce case, in reality it was a marriage annulment case, sustained by Henry VIII, King of England, against his wife of almost 20 years, Katherine of Aragon. Henry VIII claimed that his marriage was void because of the presence of a Bible impediment that forbade marrying the brother’s wife, and which could not be dispensed. He tried to convince the best lawyer of his time and famous humanist, Thomas More, to support his plea. More refused to do so, but kept silent about his reasons. This work attempts to analyse his letters and early biographies, to determine what his moral thoughts were in regard to this case and the seriousness he assigned to it; to the point of preferring death rather than declaring an opinion different from the onehe had formed in his conscience in respect of it.","PeriodicalId":35307,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-54552020000100263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolResumen Una disputa juridico-canonica conmovio la Europa del siglo XVI y tuvo repercusiones duraderas tanto politicas como eclesiasticas, sobre todo porque concurrio con la llamada reforma protestante y la separacion de la iglesia anglicana de Roma. Aunque se habla de divorcio, en realidad se trato de una causa de nulidad matrimonial, sostenida por Enrique VIII en contra de la que habia sido su mujer por casi 20 anos, Catalina de Aragon, y que se basaba en que habia un impedimento indispensable contenido en la Biblia que prohibia casarse con la mujer del hermano. El rey trato que el mejor abogado de su tiempo y celebre humanista, Tomas Moro, apoyara su demanda. Moro se nego, pero mantuvo silencio sobre sus razones. En este trabajo se intenta, por los indicios de sus cartas y primeras biografias, determinar cual fue su pensamiento al respecto y la seriedad que le asigno al asunto, al punto de preferir la muerte antes de declarar una opinion distinta a la que se habia formado en conciencia. EnglishAbstract A canonical-legal dispute shook 16th-century’s Europe and had lasting political and ecclesiastical repercussions, not least because it concurred with the so-called Protestant Reformation and the separation of the Anglican Church from the Roman Church. Although at the time, it was reffered as a divorce case, in reality it was a marriage annulment case, sustained by Henry VIII, King of England, against his wife of almost 20 years, Katherine of Aragon. Henry VIII claimed that his marriage was void because of the presence of a Bible impediment that forbade marrying the brother’s wife, and which could not be dispensed. He tried to convince the best lawyer of his time and famous humanist, Thomas More, to support his plea. More refused to do so, but kept silent about his reasons. This work attempts to analyse his letters and early biographies, to determine what his moral thoughts were in regard to this case and the seriousness he assigned to it; to the point of preferring death rather than declaring an opinion different from the onehe had formed in his conscience in respect of it.
一场法律和权威的争论在16世纪的欧洲引起了共鸣,并在政治和教会上产生了持久的影响,特别是因为它与所谓的新教改革和罗马圣公会的分离同时发生。虽然提到离婚,实际上一个交易造成的持续的婚姻无效,亨利·德反对辞藻被将近20年了,他的妻子凯瑟琳·阿拉贡,不可或缺的是,有一个障碍在圣经内容prohibia嫁给哥哥的老婆。国王得到了他那个时代最好的律师和著名的人文主义者托马斯·摩洛的支持。摩洛拒绝了,但对他的理由保持沉默。在这本书中,我们试图从他的信件和早期传记的线索中确定他对这个问题的看法,以及他对这个问题的重视程度,以至于他宁愿死也不愿发表与他在良心上形成的观点不同的观点。EnglishAbstract A canonical-legal纠纷shook 16th-century ' s Europe and问题与政治和ecclesiastical repercussions, not最不因为它concurred with the建议补救和利比里亚and the separation of the英国圣公会教堂from the罗马教会。尽管at the time, it was reffered as a divorce case, in reality it was a婚姻撤消case,持久by亨利八,King of England,反对他的妻子在几乎20年,凯瑟琳·阿拉贡。亨利八世声称他的婚姻是无效的,因为他的婚姻是圣经的障碍,他的婚姻是兄弟的妻子,他的婚姻是不存在的。他试图说服最好的律师,他的时代和著名的人文主义者,托马斯·莫尔,支持他的恳求。再加上拒绝,但对原因保持沉默。这篇文章试图分析他的信件和早期传记,以确定他的道德思想etaient关于这个案例和他的严肃;在这一点上,我宁愿死,也不愿说出我的意见,我不知道我的良心。
期刊介绍:
The aim of Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos (abbreviation REHJ, for Historical-Legal Studies Journal) is to spread original and unpublished articles regarding dogmatic, legislative and institutional history in the fields of Roman Law and Legal History, especially in the European and Ibero-American Romanistic tradition; and of History of Western legal and political thought; even if these are lectures given at scientific congresses. It also accepts revisions regarding the status of an issue and broad bibliographic revisions, as long as they are of a critical nature. The Journal does not publish works of a purely philosophical, theoretical, political or sociological content; neither publishes works of a mere outreach nature, whether they consist in non-reprocessed lectures or conferences as articles, nor if they offer the assay form ("reflections", "remarks", "considerations", "note-taking", "notes" etc.). General Coverage on the Following Topics: Roman law, History of (public and private) Law, History of canon law, History of European law, Indian Law (History of the legal system applied in the Americas during the Spanish colonisation), History of the Ibero-American national laws, History of Chilean law, History of the legal dogmas, History of the legal thought, History of the political thought, History of institutions.