Surveys as conversations between makers and takers: A conversational framework for assessing and responding to community needs

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Pub Date : 2022-09-17 DOI:10.1111/asap.12326
Stephanie J. Tepper, Mikaela K. Spruill, Bharathy Premachandra, Neil A. Lewis Jr
{"title":"Surveys as conversations between makers and takers: A conversational framework for assessing and responding to community needs","authors":"Stephanie J. Tepper,&nbsp;Mikaela K. Spruill,&nbsp;Bharathy Premachandra,&nbsp;Neil A. Lewis Jr","doi":"10.1111/asap.12326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Surveys, commonly employed in the social and behavioral sciences, are practical tools that can be used to assess the needs and attitudes of a given population. If not implemented in thoughtful ways, however, surveys can be inefficient or even harmful. With surveys often informing critical policy decisions, survey administrators must make careful methodological choices in order to obtain meaningful results and make sound decisions. In this paper, we review the social scientific literature on survey administration to aid policymakers, practitioners, and other survey administrators in understanding their <i>position</i>, identifying their <i>participants</i>, and establishing a <i>plan</i> for their surveys. We provide an overarching framework for survey design, guided by the idea that surveys are conversations between administrators and participants, in order to help creators of surveys make better decisions and engage more effectively with the communities they serve.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"22 3","pages":"857-875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surveys, commonly employed in the social and behavioral sciences, are practical tools that can be used to assess the needs and attitudes of a given population. If not implemented in thoughtful ways, however, surveys can be inefficient or even harmful. With surveys often informing critical policy decisions, survey administrators must make careful methodological choices in order to obtain meaningful results and make sound decisions. In this paper, we review the social scientific literature on survey administration to aid policymakers, practitioners, and other survey administrators in understanding their position, identifying their participants, and establishing a plan for their surveys. We provide an overarching framework for survey design, guided by the idea that surveys are conversations between administrators and participants, in order to help creators of surveys make better decisions and engage more effectively with the communities they serve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查作为制造者和接受者之间的对话:评估和回应社区需求的对话框架
调查通常用于社会科学和行为科学,是可用于评估特定人口的需求和态度的实用工具。然而,如果不以深思熟虑的方式实施,调查可能效率低下,甚至有害。由于调查经常为关键的政策决策提供信息,调查管理员必须仔细选择方法,以便获得有意义的结果并做出合理的决策。在本文中,我们回顾了有关调查管理的社会科学文献,以帮助政策制定者、从业者和其他调查管理者了解他们的立场,确定他们的参与者,并制定调查计划。我们为调查设计提供了一个总体框架,以调查是管理者和参与者之间的对话这一理念为指导,以帮助调查的创建者做出更好的决策,并更有效地与他们所服务的社区互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
期刊最新文献
Associations between negative sexual messaging in childhood and sex guilt in adulthood Anti‐egalitarianism motivates denial of male privilege Do I have to blame the perpetrator if I can't blame the victim anymore? Bystander responsibility in contact sexual violence scenarios Dehumanization in the United States carceral system: Pathways to policy reform Expectancy violations after moral transgressions: Exploring the role of moral disengagement on online vindictive word of mouth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1