Boundary spanning in the context of academic education

M. Nazarzadeh Zare
{"title":"Boundary spanning in the context of academic education","authors":"M. Nazarzadeh Zare","doi":"10.52547/edcj.15.47.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global society, we live in today, is very intertwined and complicated. Hence, an ability to expand organizational and trans-organizational boundaries plays a critical and vital role in educational systems (1). The concept of boundary spanning, which was formed in the fields of behavioral psychology and organizational theories in the mid-1970s (2), is somewhat unknown in the medical and health education system (3). Meanwhile, one of the important approaches and activities that can help the improvement of health and medical education systems is boundary spanning activities (4). The boundary spanning theory, which was formed based on sociotechnical and open systems theories (5), is defined as creating a capacity for orientation, alignment, and commitment across the borders of an organization in order to realize the goals and visions of that organization (6). The individuals who are called boundary-spanners play an essential role in boundaryspanning activities (7). In the context of a university system, boundary spanners can include faculty members, staff, and university administrators (8). Therefore, at the level of an academic system, boundary spanners should be aware of the priorities and needs of their academic community, as well as their surrounding environment at organizational and extra-organizational levels (9). On the other hand, faculty members, as one of the important human capital of any university, apart from the three roles of education, research, and service delivery, perform a fourth role, which is boundary spanning. In this role, the faculty member can act at two organizational and extra-organizational levels. In this regard, at the organizational level, the boundary spanning role of faculty members is the reduction of tensions and environmental complications, as well as making a link among individuals, disciplines, faculties, and academic departments. Moreover, they contribute greatly to the facilitation of knowledge exchange between individuals and academic departments and, subsequently, the enhancement of teaching and learning quality (9-10). In this regard, recent studies have pointed out that in the context of academic education, faculty members' boundary spanning activities have an influential role in teaching and learning. In the role of a boundary-spanner, the faculty members strive to create a bridge among learners of different genders, cultures, and ethnicities by establishing interaction and communication. In so doing, they not only help create a collaborative learning process but also improve the teaching-learning process through sharing and transferring knowledge and information (11). Hence, the faculty members' use of organizational boundary spanning methods in educational contexts contributes greatly to teaching and learning leadership, creating and maintaining key relationships in the teaching-learning process. Copyright © 2021, This is an original open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-noncommercial 4.0 International License which permit copy and redistribution of the material just in noncommercial usages with proper citation Nazarzade Zare. J Med Edu Dev. 2022; 15(47): xx-xx Journal of Medical Education Development","PeriodicalId":30594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/edcj.15.47.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global society, we live in today, is very intertwined and complicated. Hence, an ability to expand organizational and trans-organizational boundaries plays a critical and vital role in educational systems (1). The concept of boundary spanning, which was formed in the fields of behavioral psychology and organizational theories in the mid-1970s (2), is somewhat unknown in the medical and health education system (3). Meanwhile, one of the important approaches and activities that can help the improvement of health and medical education systems is boundary spanning activities (4). The boundary spanning theory, which was formed based on sociotechnical and open systems theories (5), is defined as creating a capacity for orientation, alignment, and commitment across the borders of an organization in order to realize the goals and visions of that organization (6). The individuals who are called boundary-spanners play an essential role in boundaryspanning activities (7). In the context of a university system, boundary spanners can include faculty members, staff, and university administrators (8). Therefore, at the level of an academic system, boundary spanners should be aware of the priorities and needs of their academic community, as well as their surrounding environment at organizational and extra-organizational levels (9). On the other hand, faculty members, as one of the important human capital of any university, apart from the three roles of education, research, and service delivery, perform a fourth role, which is boundary spanning. In this role, the faculty member can act at two organizational and extra-organizational levels. In this regard, at the organizational level, the boundary spanning role of faculty members is the reduction of tensions and environmental complications, as well as making a link among individuals, disciplines, faculties, and academic departments. Moreover, they contribute greatly to the facilitation of knowledge exchange between individuals and academic departments and, subsequently, the enhancement of teaching and learning quality (9-10). In this regard, recent studies have pointed out that in the context of academic education, faculty members' boundary spanning activities have an influential role in teaching and learning. In the role of a boundary-spanner, the faculty members strive to create a bridge among learners of different genders, cultures, and ethnicities by establishing interaction and communication. In so doing, they not only help create a collaborative learning process but also improve the teaching-learning process through sharing and transferring knowledge and information (11). Hence, the faculty members' use of organizational boundary spanning methods in educational contexts contributes greatly to teaching and learning leadership, creating and maintaining key relationships in the teaching-learning process. Copyright © 2021, This is an original open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-noncommercial 4.0 International License which permit copy and redistribution of the material just in noncommercial usages with proper citation Nazarzade Zare. J Med Edu Dev. 2022; 15(47): xx-xx Journal of Medical Education Development
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术教育背景下的边界跨越
我们今天生活的全球社会是相互交织和复杂的。因此,扩大组织和跨组织边界的能力在教育系统中发挥着至关重要的作用(1)。边界跨越的概念形成于20世纪70年代中期的行为心理学和组织理论领域(2),在医学和健康教育系统中有些不为人知(3)。同时,有助于改善卫生和医学教育系统的重要途径和活动之一是跨界活动(4)。边界跨越理论是在社会技术和开放系统理论(5)的基础上形成的,它被定义为创造一种跨组织边界的定向、协调和承诺能力,以实现该组织的目标和愿景(6)。被称为越界者的个体在越界活动中发挥着重要作用(7)。在大学系统的背景下,边界扳手可以包括教员、工作人员和大学管理人员(8)。因此,在学术体系的层面上,边界管理者应该意识到他们学术界的优先事项和需求,以及他们在组织和组织外层面的周围环境(9)。另一方面,教师作为任何大学的重要人力资本之一,除了教育、研究和服务提供三个角色外,还扮演着第四个角色,即跨越边界。在这个角色中,教员可以在两个组织和组织外级别上发挥作用。在这方面,在组织层面,教员的跨界作用是减少紧张局势和环境复杂性,并在个人、学科、教员和学术部门之间建立联系。此外,它们极大地促进了个人和学术部门之间的知识交流,从而提高了教学质量(9-10)。在这方面,最近的研究指出,在学术教育的背景下,教师的跨界活动对教学有影响。作为一名边界扳手,教员们努力通过建立互动和沟通,在不同性别、文化和种族的学习者之间建立一座桥梁。在这样做的过程中,它们不仅有助于创建协作学习过程,而且通过共享和传递知识和信息来改善教学过程(11)。因此,教师在教育环境中使用组织边界跨越方法,有助于教学和学习领导力,在教学过程中创造和维护关键关系。版权所有©2021,这是一篇根据知识共享署名非商业4.0国际许可证条款分发的原创开放获取文章,该许可证允许以非商业用途复制和重新分发材料,并适当引用Nazarzade Zare。医学教育发展杂志2022;15(47):xx xx医学教育发展杂志
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Impact of case study-based teaching on academic enthusiasm of midwifery students toward ectopic pregnancy: A cross-sectional study Teacher as a hacker: A dramatic change in the education process Enhancing and impeding factors of problem-based learning in undergraduate medical education: A qualitative study Educational scholarship and Ph.D. curriculum of medical education in Iran: A serious critique and a proposal Investigating the improvement of nursing students’ clinical competence through the mastery learning approach compared to the traditional method in the oncology department: A mixed-methods study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1