Cost Effectiveness Analysis Using Antibiotics of Cefixime and Cefotaxime for Diarrhea Patients at X Hospital in 2017

G. Citraningtyas, Ranny Inggrid Ruru, Amelia Nalang
{"title":"Cost Effectiveness Analysis Using Antibiotics of Cefixime and Cefotaxime for Diarrhea Patients at X Hospital in 2017","authors":"G. Citraningtyas, Ranny Inggrid Ruru, Amelia Nalang","doi":"10.22146/JMPF.36258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diarrhea is a disease characterized by a change in the shape and consistency of stools, from soft to liquid, and increased frequency of bowel movements, which happen three times or more in a day. Different use of antibiotics by patients results in patient’s medical cost increase. The use of expensive antibiotics does not guarantee the effectiveness of patient care, therefore a research needs to be done to determine which antibiotic therapy is more cost effective between cefixime and cefotaxime antibiotics in hospitalized diarrhea patients in X hospital. This research was descriptive research with retrospective data retrieval. This research was conducted at Medical Record Installation and  Fund mobilization department of X hospital from November 2017 - Maret 2018. The samples in this study were 42 patients with 21 patients using Cefixime and 21 patients were using an Cefotaxime. Data was analyzed descriptively in table form. The results showed that the more cost-effective therapy between Cefixime and Cefotaxime in the treatment of diarrhea in X hospital was therapy with Cefixime antibiotic, which can be seen from ACER (Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio) Cefixime Rp. 323.428,14/day compared with Cefotaxime ACER value of Rp. 477.180,26/day for each increase in effectiveness. The lowest ICER value on Cefixime was Rp. -50.565,8.-","PeriodicalId":33008,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/JMPF.36258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diarrhea is a disease characterized by a change in the shape and consistency of stools, from soft to liquid, and increased frequency of bowel movements, which happen three times or more in a day. Different use of antibiotics by patients results in patient’s medical cost increase. The use of expensive antibiotics does not guarantee the effectiveness of patient care, therefore a research needs to be done to determine which antibiotic therapy is more cost effective between cefixime and cefotaxime antibiotics in hospitalized diarrhea patients in X hospital. This research was descriptive research with retrospective data retrieval. This research was conducted at Medical Record Installation and  Fund mobilization department of X hospital from November 2017 - Maret 2018. The samples in this study were 42 patients with 21 patients using Cefixime and 21 patients were using an Cefotaxime. Data was analyzed descriptively in table form. The results showed that the more cost-effective therapy between Cefixime and Cefotaxime in the treatment of diarrhea in X hospital was therapy with Cefixime antibiotic, which can be seen from ACER (Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio) Cefixime Rp. 323.428,14/day compared with Cefotaxime ACER value of Rp. 477.180,26/day for each increase in effectiveness. The lowest ICER value on Cefixime was Rp. -50.565,8.-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017年X医院头孢克肟和头孢噻肟治疗腹泻患者的成本-效果分析
腹泻是一种以大便形状和稠度改变为特征的疾病,由软质变为液体,排便频率增加,一天发生三次或更多。患者对抗生素的不同使用导致了患者医疗费用的增加。使用昂贵的抗生素并不能保证患者护理的有效性,因此需要对X医院住院腹泻患者在头孢克肟和头孢噻肟抗生素中哪一种抗生素治疗更具成本效益进行研究。本研究为回顾性资料检索的描述性研究。本研究于2017年11月至2018年11月在X医院病案安装与资金动员部进行。本研究样本为42例患者,其中21例患者使用头孢克肟,21例患者同时使用头孢噻肟。以表格形式对数据进行描述性分析。结果显示,在X医院头孢噻肟与头孢噻肟治疗腹泻中,头孢噻肟抗生素治疗的成本效益更高,从平均成本-效果比ACER(平均成本-效果比)来看,头孢噻肟Rp. 323.428,14/d与头孢噻肟的ACER值Rp. 477.180,26/d,每增加一次有效性。头孢克肟的最低ICER值为Rp。-50.565, 8.,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Cycle Threshold RT-PCR SARS Cov-2 between Saliva Specimen and Nasopharyngeal Swab Survei Kesediaan Menggunakan Telemedicine Pada Mahasiswa Farmasi Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta THE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT SAFETY CULTURE AMONG DOCTORS, NURSES AND PHARMACISTS IN A PUBLIC HOSPITAL IN INDONESIA Factor Affecting Job Satisfaction In Community Pharmacists: A Review Pengetahuan Masyarakat Tentang Penggunaan Suplemen Vitamin untuk Meningkatkan Imunitas Tubuh Selama Pandemi COVID-19 di Kelurahan Klender, Jakarta Timur dan Kecamatan Panimbang, Banten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1