Participation in Value-Based Payment Programs and U.S. Acute Care Hospital Population Health Partnerships

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-20-00338
Larry R. Hearld, Aizhan Karabukayeva
{"title":"Participation in Value-Based Payment Programs and U.S. Acute Care Hospital Population Health Partnerships","authors":"Larry R. Hearld, Aizhan Karabukayeva","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-20-00338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Goal: The goal of this study was to describe the prevalence and pattern of population health partnerships by hospitals and examine whether these partnerships were associated with different types of payment model programs. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 3,012 U.S. hospitals using data from the American Hospital Association’s Annual Survey, the Area Health Resources File, and the County Health Rankings & Roadmaps data. We ran a multivariable Poisson regression model to examine the relationship between value-based payment designs and the number of population health partnerships. Binary logistic regression models were used to assess whether participation in value-based payment design programs was associated with specific types of population health partnerships. Principal Findings: We found that two thirds or more of hospitals used more informal collaborative partnerships with local or state government, faith-based organizations, and local businesses; formal alliances were most common with health insurance companies and other healthcare providers. Accountable care organizations and bundled payment program participation were associated with greater numbers of population health partnerships, whereas hospital ownership of a health plan was not associated with significantly greater numbers of population health partnerships. Applications to Practice: Hospitals were engaged in an intermediate number of partnerships (mean = 3.5, out of 8.0 possible), with opportunities for more partnerships with specific types of organizations (faith-based organizations, health insurance companies). Our findings also suggest that certain types of payment models, particularly those that are less capital intensive and entail less extensive organizational transformation on the part of hospitals, may support hospital engagement in population health partnerships. Hospital leaders need to monitor these partnerships continually to determine if they can capitalize on opportunities to play a more prominent role in population health management in local communities.","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"67 1","pages":"103 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-20-00338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

SUMMARY Goal: The goal of this study was to describe the prevalence and pattern of population health partnerships by hospitals and examine whether these partnerships were associated with different types of payment model programs. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 3,012 U.S. hospitals using data from the American Hospital Association’s Annual Survey, the Area Health Resources File, and the County Health Rankings & Roadmaps data. We ran a multivariable Poisson regression model to examine the relationship between value-based payment designs and the number of population health partnerships. Binary logistic regression models were used to assess whether participation in value-based payment design programs was associated with specific types of population health partnerships. Principal Findings: We found that two thirds or more of hospitals used more informal collaborative partnerships with local or state government, faith-based organizations, and local businesses; formal alliances were most common with health insurance companies and other healthcare providers. Accountable care organizations and bundled payment program participation were associated with greater numbers of population health partnerships, whereas hospital ownership of a health plan was not associated with significantly greater numbers of population health partnerships. Applications to Practice: Hospitals were engaged in an intermediate number of partnerships (mean = 3.5, out of 8.0 possible), with opportunities for more partnerships with specific types of organizations (faith-based organizations, health insurance companies). Our findings also suggest that certain types of payment models, particularly those that are less capital intensive and entail less extensive organizational transformation on the part of hospitals, may support hospital engagement in population health partnerships. Hospital leaders need to monitor these partnerships continually to determine if they can capitalize on opportunities to play a more prominent role in population health management in local communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与基于价值的支付计划和美国急性护理医院人口健康伙伴关系
总结目标:本研究的目的是描述医院人口健康伙伴关系的流行率和模式,并检查这些伙伴关系是否与不同类型的支付模式计划有关。方法:我们使用美国医院协会年度调查、地区卫生资源文件和县卫生排名和路线图数据,对3012家美国医院进行了横断面分析。我们运行了一个多变量泊松回归模型来检验基于价值的支付设计与人口健康伙伴关系数量之间的关系。二元逻辑回归模型用于评估参与基于价值的支付设计计划是否与特定类型的人口健康伙伴关系有关。主要发现:我们发现,三分之二或更多的医院与地方或州政府、信仰组织和当地企业建立了更多的非正式合作伙伴关系;与健康保险公司和其他医疗保健提供者的正式联盟最为常见。负责任的护理组织和捆绑支付计划的参与与更多的人口健康伙伴关系有关,而医院对健康计划的所有权与显著更多的人口卫生伙伴关系无关。实践应用:医院参与了中等数量的伙伴关系(平均值=3.5,可能为8.0),有机会与特定类型的组织(信仰组织、健康保险公司)建立更多的伙伴关系。我们的研究结果还表明,某些类型的支付模式,特别是那些资本密集度较低、需要医院进行较不广泛的组织变革的支付模式可能会支持医院参与人口健康伙伴关系。医院领导需要不断监测这些伙伴关系,以确定他们是否能够利用机会在当地社区的人口健康管理中发挥更突出的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
期刊最新文献
A New Era for the Patient Safety Imperative. An Exploratory Study of Dynamic Capabilities and Performance Improvement in Hospitals. Associations Between Integration and Patient Experience in Hospital-Based Health Systems: An Exploration of Horizontal and Vertical Forms of Integration. Associations Between Organizational Support, Burnout, and Professional Fulfillment Among US Physicians During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Burke Kline, DHA, FACHE, CHFP, CEO, Jefferson Community Health & Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1