Do ruminants and hindgut fermenters differ in their activity? Comparison of syntopic black wildebeest and Cape mountain zebra

IF 1.2 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behaviour Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1163/1568539x-bja10189
Ryan E. Forbes, G. Kerley
{"title":"Do ruminants and hindgut fermenters differ in their activity? Comparison of syntopic black wildebeest and Cape mountain zebra","authors":"Ryan E. Forbes, G. Kerley","doi":"10.1163/1568539x-bja10189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nOptimally foraging animals should minimise time spent foraging in order to perform other fitness-enhancing activities. The ruminants’ more efficient digestive system, requiring lower volumes of forage, is predicted to provide an advantage over hindgut fermenters with respect to foraging effort, but this may be offset by their need for higher quality forage. We contrasted the activity of two similarly-sized, syntopic grazers, black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou), a ruminant, and Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra), a hindgut fermenter, using camera trap data and tested the volume-requirement and the nutrient-driven hypotheses, seasonally. Zebra and wildebeest activity varied seasonally, potentially due to differences in resource availability. In winter, a greater proportion of wildebeest were recorded grazing relative to zebra, supporting the nutrient-driven hypothesis, whilst the inverse occurred (although not significantly) in summer, supporting the volume-requirement hypothesis. Seasonal variation in resources may provide temporal foraging trade-offs of benefits for ruminants and hindgut fermenters.","PeriodicalId":8822,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-bja10189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimally foraging animals should minimise time spent foraging in order to perform other fitness-enhancing activities. The ruminants’ more efficient digestive system, requiring lower volumes of forage, is predicted to provide an advantage over hindgut fermenters with respect to foraging effort, but this may be offset by their need for higher quality forage. We contrasted the activity of two similarly-sized, syntopic grazers, black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou), a ruminant, and Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra), a hindgut fermenter, using camera trap data and tested the volume-requirement and the nutrient-driven hypotheses, seasonally. Zebra and wildebeest activity varied seasonally, potentially due to differences in resource availability. In winter, a greater proportion of wildebeest were recorded grazing relative to zebra, supporting the nutrient-driven hypothesis, whilst the inverse occurred (although not significantly) in summer, supporting the volume-requirement hypothesis. Seasonal variation in resources may provide temporal foraging trade-offs of benefits for ruminants and hindgut fermenters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反刍动物和后肠发酵器的活性不同吗?黑角马与开普山斑马的比较
最佳觅食动物应该尽量减少花在觅食上的时间,以便进行其他增强健康的活动。反刍动物更有效的消化系统,需要更少的饲料,预计在觅食方面比后肠发酵剂有优势,但这可能被它们对高质量饲料的需求所抵消。我们对比了两种相似大小的合成食草动物——反刍动物黑角马(Connochaetes gnou)和后肠发酵剂开普山斑马(Equus zebra zebra)——的活动,使用相机陷阱数据,并季节性地测试了体积需求和营养驱动的假设。斑马和角马的活动随季节变化,可能是由于资源可用性的差异。在冬季,与斑马相比,角马的放牧比例更高,这支持了营养驱动的假设,而在夏季,相反的情况发生(尽管不显著),支持了体积需求的假设。资源的季节性变化可能为反刍动物和后肠发酵菌提供了时间上的利益权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour
Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Behaviour is interested in all aspects of animal (including human) behaviour, from ecology and physiology to learning, cognition, and neuroscience. Evolutionary approaches, which concern themselves with the advantages of behaviour or capacities for the organism and its reproduction, receive much attention both at a theoretical level and as it relates to specific behavior.
期刊最新文献
Coastal dolphins provide foraging opportunities to benthic-feeding seabirds in a tropical seagrass ecosystem Do vocal mimics learn their mimetic songs from heterospecifics or conspecifics? Moving vs still prey: do common wall lizards show any preference? Within-population variation in signal timing preferences and its implications for sexual selection on male displays Maternal genetic and non-genetic effects on the development of exploration and anxiety-like behaviours in a native Australian rodent, the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat Melomys cervinipes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1