The effectiveness of audit sampling methods recommended to small and medium practices in guides published by audit regulators

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE South African Journal of Accounting Research Pub Date : 2018-09-02 DOI:10.1080/10291954.2018.1514140
E. Swanepoel
{"title":"The effectiveness of audit sampling methods recommended to small and medium practices in guides published by audit regulators","authors":"E. Swanepoel","doi":"10.1080/10291954.2018.1514140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper focuses on the quality of audits in small and medium practices (SMPs) when these audits are performed according to the freely available guidelines published by various regulatory bodies. Audit sampling is highlighted as a key component of audit quality in several reports of regulatory bodies’ inspection findings. A sampling methodology frequently used by SMPs is monetary unit sampling (MUS) in combination with either MUS or ratio projection. The effectiveness of this approach is investigated in terms of four criteria defined in the paper. Simulation was used for this purpose. Different scenarios were obtained by varying sample size, number of tainted items in the population and the total error amount. An actual revenue database was used as a point of departure. The study shows that simply following the proposed sampling guideline, can easily lead to sub-optimal use of resources. A more considered approach may alleviate this problem.","PeriodicalId":43731,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"109 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10291954.2018.1514140","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2018.1514140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper focuses on the quality of audits in small and medium practices (SMPs) when these audits are performed according to the freely available guidelines published by various regulatory bodies. Audit sampling is highlighted as a key component of audit quality in several reports of regulatory bodies’ inspection findings. A sampling methodology frequently used by SMPs is monetary unit sampling (MUS) in combination with either MUS or ratio projection. The effectiveness of this approach is investigated in terms of four criteria defined in the paper. Simulation was used for this purpose. Different scenarios were obtained by varying sample size, number of tainted items in the population and the total error amount. An actual revenue database was used as a point of departure. The study shows that simply following the proposed sampling guideline, can easily lead to sub-optimal use of resources. A more considered approach may alleviate this problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计监管机构发布的指南中向中小型实践推荐的审计抽样方法的有效性
本文重点关注中小型企业(SMPs)的审计质量,这些审计是根据各种监管机构发布的免费指南进行的。在监管机构检查结果的几份报告中,审计抽样被强调为审计质量的一个关键组成部分。SMPs经常使用的采样方法是货币单位采样(MUS)与MUS或比率投影相结合。根据本文定义的四个标准对该方法的有效性进行了研究。为此使用了模拟。通过改变样本量、人群中受污染项目的数量和总误差量,获得了不同的场景。实际收入数据库被用作出发点。研究表明,简单地遵循所提出的抽样准则,很容易导致资源的次优利用。更深思熟虑的方法可能会缓解这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Impacts of corporate governance attributes on audit quality in emerging economies: The case of India A systematic literature review of blockchain technology and accounting issues: Is it a hype or hope? Is there a gender gap in audit fees in Spain? Explaining the variables involved in audit fees Deductibility of input tax on share issue costs in the context of the broad taxation principles Determinants of the effective tax rate: Board composition of South African firms listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1