Definitions of biodiversity from urban gardeners

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Urban Ecology Pub Date : 2021-01-22 DOI:10.1093/JUE/JUAB005
Briony A. Norton, Bowen Shang, A. Ramsey, D. Sheffield
{"title":"Definitions of biodiversity from urban gardeners","authors":"Briony A. Norton, Bowen Shang, A. Ramsey, D. Sheffield","doi":"10.1093/JUE/JUAB005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Living in urban environments can leave people disconnected from nature and less likely to engage with biodiversity conservation. Within urban areas, residential gardens can occupy large proportions of greenspace and provide important habitat for biodiversity. Understanding the views and knowledge of garden owners who have collective responsibility for managing these areas is therefore important. We aimed to understand how urban garden owners understand biodiversity. We surveyed garden owners in Derby, UK, across 20 census output areas spanning a socioeconomic spectrum. Residents were asked to explain their understanding of ‘biodiversity’ in a short definition format. Responses were classified using thematic and word frequency analyses. Of 255 respondents, approximately one-third were unable to provide a definition. Themes that emerged in frequency order were as follows: variety of species or environments, coexistence of organisms, conservation of nature, a synonym for habitat and uncommon answers not clearly related to biodiversity. Members of wildlife or gardening charities and people with higher levels of formal education were more likely to provide definitions in line with formal definitions. We detected no difference between keen and less keen gardeners and little association between definitions and gardening for wildlife behaviours. These short-form responses captured many themes longer and/or qualitative assessments have identified, illustrating a diversity and depth of understanding of the concepts of biodiversity, without necessarily adhering to the formal definition. Given the variety of understanding, at this critical period, technical terms, even common ones, should be used with an open mind about how people interpret and act on them.","PeriodicalId":37022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JUE/JUAB005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Living in urban environments can leave people disconnected from nature and less likely to engage with biodiversity conservation. Within urban areas, residential gardens can occupy large proportions of greenspace and provide important habitat for biodiversity. Understanding the views and knowledge of garden owners who have collective responsibility for managing these areas is therefore important. We aimed to understand how urban garden owners understand biodiversity. We surveyed garden owners in Derby, UK, across 20 census output areas spanning a socioeconomic spectrum. Residents were asked to explain their understanding of ‘biodiversity’ in a short definition format. Responses were classified using thematic and word frequency analyses. Of 255 respondents, approximately one-third were unable to provide a definition. Themes that emerged in frequency order were as follows: variety of species or environments, coexistence of organisms, conservation of nature, a synonym for habitat and uncommon answers not clearly related to biodiversity. Members of wildlife or gardening charities and people with higher levels of formal education were more likely to provide definitions in line with formal definitions. We detected no difference between keen and less keen gardeners and little association between definitions and gardening for wildlife behaviours. These short-form responses captured many themes longer and/or qualitative assessments have identified, illustrating a diversity and depth of understanding of the concepts of biodiversity, without necessarily adhering to the formal definition. Given the variety of understanding, at this critical period, technical terms, even common ones, should be used with an open mind about how people interpret and act on them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市园丁对生物多样性的定义
生活在城市环境中会使人们与自然脱节,不太可能参与生物多样性保护。在城市地区,住宅花园可以占据很大比例的绿地,并为生物多样性提供重要的栖息地。因此,了解对管理这些区域负有集体责任的花园所有者的观点和知识非常重要。我们旨在了解城市花园所有者如何理解生物多样性。我们调查了英国德比郡20个人口普查输出地区的花园业主,涵盖了社会经济领域。居民被要求用简短的定义格式解释他们对“生物多样性”的理解。使用主题分析和词频分析对答复进行分类。在255名受访者中,大约三分之一的人无法提供定义。按频率顺序出现的主题如下:物种或环境的多样性、生物的共存、自然保护、栖息地的同义词以及与生物多样性没有明确联系的罕见答案。野生动物或园艺慈善机构的成员以及受过高等正规教育的人更有可能提供符合正规定义的定义。我们发现热衷于园艺和不太热衷于园艺的人之间没有区别,野生动物行为的定义和园艺之间也几乎没有关联。这些简短的答复涵盖了更长时间和/或定性评估确定的许多主题,说明了对生物多样性概念的理解的多样性和深度,而不一定遵守正式定义。考虑到理解的多样性,在这个关键时期,技术术语,甚至是常见术语,都应该以开放的心态使用,了解人们如何解释和采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Ecology
Journal of Urban Ecology Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond the metropolis: street tree communities and resident perceptions on ecosystem services in small urban centers in India Comparing fear responses of two lizard species across habitats varying in human impact Perceived and desired outcomes of urban coyote management methods Garbage in may not equal garbage out: sex mediates effects of ‘junk food’ in a synanthropic species Effects of landscape cover and yard features on feral and free-roaming cat (Felis catus) distribution, abundance and activity patterns in a suburban area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1