How citizens’ conceptions of democracy relate to positive and negative partisanship towards populist parties

IF 4.5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE West European Politics Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1080/01402382.2023.2199376
Carsten Wegscheider, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Steven M. Van Hauwaert
{"title":"How citizens’ conceptions of democracy relate to positive and negative partisanship towards populist parties","authors":"Carsten Wegscheider, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Steven M. Van Hauwaert","doi":"10.1080/01402382.2023.2199376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although scholars emphasise the contentious relationship of populist forces to (liberal) democracy, less attention has been paid to whether this extends to those who support or oppose populist parties. This article utilises a public opinion dataset from ten Western European countries to analyse how citizens’ conceptions of democracy relate to the behavioural intention to vote for or against populist parties. The empirical analysis shows that positive and negative identification with populist parties is driven by different understandings of democracy: While individuals who are less inclined to liberal democracy but more to direct democracy and authoritarian forms of rule are more likely to sympathise with populist parties, the opposite understanding of democracy predicts opposition to both left-wing and right-wing populists. These findings demonstrate that citizens with positive and negative partisanship towards populist parties are divided in their interpretations about both the conceptual meaning and the normative functioning of democracy.","PeriodicalId":48213,"journal":{"name":"West European Politics","volume":"46 1","pages":"1235 - 1263"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2199376","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Although scholars emphasise the contentious relationship of populist forces to (liberal) democracy, less attention has been paid to whether this extends to those who support or oppose populist parties. This article utilises a public opinion dataset from ten Western European countries to analyse how citizens’ conceptions of democracy relate to the behavioural intention to vote for or against populist parties. The empirical analysis shows that positive and negative identification with populist parties is driven by different understandings of democracy: While individuals who are less inclined to liberal democracy but more to direct democracy and authoritarian forms of rule are more likely to sympathise with populist parties, the opposite understanding of democracy predicts opposition to both left-wing and right-wing populists. These findings demonstrate that citizens with positive and negative partisanship towards populist parties are divided in their interpretations about both the conceptual meaning and the normative functioning of democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民的民主观念如何与民粹主义政党的积极和消极党派之争联系起来
虽然学者们强调民粹主义力量与(自由)民主之间有争议的关系,但很少有人注意到这种关系是否延伸到那些支持或反对民粹主义政党的人身上。本文利用来自10个西欧国家的民意数据集来分析公民对民主的概念与投票支持或反对民粹主义政党的行为意图之间的关系。实证分析表明,对民粹主义政党的积极和消极认同是由对民主的不同理解驱动的:虽然不太倾向于自由民主,但更倾向于直接民主和威权统治形式的个人更有可能同情民粹主义政党,但对民主的相反理解预示着左翼和右翼民粹主义者的反对。这些发现表明,对民粹主义政党有积极和消极党派倾向的公民对民主的概念意义和规范功能的解释存在分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
West European Politics
West European Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: West European Politics (WEP)has established itself as one of the most authoritative journals covering political and social issues in Western Europe. It has a substantial reviews section and coverage of all national elections in Western Europe. Its comprehensive scope, embracing all the major political and social developments in all West European countries, including the European Union, makes it essential reading for both political practitioners and academics.
期刊最新文献
Gordon Smith and Vincent Wright Memorial Prizes 2023 The role of national delegations in the politics of the European Parliament Un-solvable crises? Differential implementation and transboundary crisis management in the EU How the populist radical right exploits crisis: comparing the role of proximity in the COVID-19 and refugee crises in Germany Competing on competence: the issue profiles of mainstream parties in Western Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1