Towards a theory of neoliberal constitutionalism: Addressing Chile’s first constitution-making laboratory

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Constitutionalism Pub Date : 2021-04-23 DOI:10.1017/S2045381721000058
Benjamin Alemparte
{"title":"Towards a theory of neoliberal constitutionalism: Addressing Chile’s first constitution-making laboratory","authors":"Benjamin Alemparte","doi":"10.1017/S2045381721000058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Before neoliberalism became global, it was an intellectual project that had a particular view of the power of constitutions to limit sovereign states, anchor economic freedoms and protect markets from democratic pressures for greater equality. In Latin America and the developing world, neoliberalism has long been identified with the political economy of the Washington Consensus. However, the comprehensive study of its legal foundations and institutional arrangements is still an area of limited scholarly attention. This article attempts to advance in that direction. By examining the work of Friedrich A. Hayek, Milton Friedman and James M. Buchanan, it explores a theory of neoliberal constitutionalism within Chile, the so-called first neoliberal laboratory. These authors visited the country during the Pinochet dictatorship (1973–90), and were connected with top Chilean authorities as part of their global ambitions to implement their theoretical agendas in real-world scenarios. The article argues that Chile’s constitution-making process between 1973 and 1980 offered an on-site experiment in introducing neoliberal’s radical economic transformation. It addresses how the dictatorship’s natural law-based rule of law principles were compatible with the neoliberal constitutional ideology by supporting a distinctive view of the state’s role and designing the innovative institutional arrangements necessary to guarantee the market’s priority in the structural and rights dimension of the 1980 Constitution. In the wake of Chile’s recent constitutional change agenda, this article not only contributes to the existing debate by reflecting on the ideological origins of the still-persistent constitutional neoliberal features, but also works as a case study for evaluating new global turns towards authoritarian neoliberal politics.","PeriodicalId":37136,"journal":{"name":"Global Constitutionalism","volume":"11 1","pages":"83 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S2045381721000058","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Constitutionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Before neoliberalism became global, it was an intellectual project that had a particular view of the power of constitutions to limit sovereign states, anchor economic freedoms and protect markets from democratic pressures for greater equality. In Latin America and the developing world, neoliberalism has long been identified with the political economy of the Washington Consensus. However, the comprehensive study of its legal foundations and institutional arrangements is still an area of limited scholarly attention. This article attempts to advance in that direction. By examining the work of Friedrich A. Hayek, Milton Friedman and James M. Buchanan, it explores a theory of neoliberal constitutionalism within Chile, the so-called first neoliberal laboratory. These authors visited the country during the Pinochet dictatorship (1973–90), and were connected with top Chilean authorities as part of their global ambitions to implement their theoretical agendas in real-world scenarios. The article argues that Chile’s constitution-making process between 1973 and 1980 offered an on-site experiment in introducing neoliberal’s radical economic transformation. It addresses how the dictatorship’s natural law-based rule of law principles were compatible with the neoliberal constitutional ideology by supporting a distinctive view of the state’s role and designing the innovative institutional arrangements necessary to guarantee the market’s priority in the structural and rights dimension of the 1980 Constitution. In the wake of Chile’s recent constitutional change agenda, this article not only contributes to the existing debate by reflecting on the ideological origins of the still-persistent constitutional neoliberal features, but also works as a case study for evaluating new global turns towards authoritarian neoliberal politics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向新自由宪政理论:智利第一个制宪实验室
在新自由主义走向全球之前,它是一项智力工程,对宪法的力量有着特殊的看法,认为宪法可以限制主权国家,巩固经济自由,保护市场不受民主压力的影响,从而实现更大的平等。在拉丁美洲和发展中国家,新自由主义长期以来被认为是华盛顿共识的政治经济学。然而,对其法律基础和制度安排的全面研究仍然是一个学术关注有限的领域。本文试图朝这个方向推进。通过考察弗里德里希·a·哈耶克、米尔顿·弗里德曼和詹姆斯·m·布坎南的著作,本书在智利——所谓的第一个新自由主义实验室——探索了一种新自由主义宪政理论。这些作者在皮诺切特独裁时期(1973-90)访问了智利,并与智利高层当局建立了联系,作为他们在现实世界中实施其理论议程的全球野心的一部分。本文认为,智利1973年至1980年的制宪过程为引进新自由主义激进的经济转型提供了一个现场实验。它通过支持国家角色的独特观点,并设计必要的创新制度安排,以确保市场在1980年宪法的结构和权利维度中的优先地位,阐述了独裁政权基于自然法的法治原则如何与新自由主义宪法意识形态相兼容。在智利最近的宪法改革议程之后,本文不仅通过反思仍然存在的宪法新自由主义特征的意识形态起源来为现有的辩论做出贡献,而且还作为评估全球转向威权新自由主义政治的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Constitutionalism
Global Constitutionalism Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Between militant democracy and citizen vigilantism: Using citizens’ assemblies to keep parties democratic Dead or alive? Global constitutionalism and international law after the start of the war in Ukraine Between (ir)responsibility and (in)appropriateness: Conceptualizing norm-related state behaviour in the Russian war against Ukraine How do constitution-making processes fail? The case of Chile’s Constitutional Convention (2021–22) Utopian constitutionalism in Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1